Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Tator
Valiant A
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:51 am
Location: Pacific Coast

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Tator »

Kishkumen wrote:
Fri Mar 25, 2022 5:06 pm
Shulem wrote:
Fri Mar 25, 2022 4:03 pm
Yeah well, how much money do you think you could have gotten by scrapping his gold plates? I think the case is closed that you wouldn't have gotten much. The plates under the cloth were fake just like the novel he dictated was not historical by any means. It was ALL a fraud. All of it!
Don't spend any money on a degree in literary studies, Shulem, because Joseph Smith's contemporaries knew more about literary genre than you do.

The Book of Mormon is a Bible, not a novel.

They called it. That is what he made it to be. Novel just isn't the right word.
I'm good with novel. What's the right word then? Pretend Bible, made up Bible, imaginary Bible?
User avatar
Bret Ripley
Stake President
Posts: 585
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:55 am

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Bret Ripley »

Shulem wrote:
Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:10 pm
The translators of the King James Bible were careful in selecting the words in which to translate and obviously the word "START" was never ever employed.
Long before the KJV, Wycliffe used derivations of "start" in his translation and several modern translations have followed suit (e.g. RSV, NIV). It should hardly be necessary to point to the obvious implication: Wycliffe had a seat on the celebrated "ghost committee" yet doesn't consider himself too hoity-toity to lend a hand to translators who don't have access to magic rocks and hardly ever bother to bury their source material in the woods.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Kishkumen »

Tator wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 4:34 am
I'm good with novel. What's the right word then? Pretend Bible, made up Bible, imaginary Bible?
Bible works just fine. Imaginary on what basis? Given the dubious or fictional authors of much of the original Bible, it is not clear to me what makes the Mormon Bible all that different in this regard.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7603
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Shulem »

Kishkumen wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:32 pm
Tator wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 4:34 am
I'm good with novel. What's the right word then? Pretend Bible, made up Bible, imaginary Bible?
Bible works just fine. Imaginary on what basis? Given the dubious or fictional authors of much of the original Bible, it is not clear to me what makes the Mormon Bible all that different in this regard.

Many of the characters in the Bible were real people. The geography is also real. All of the characters of the Book of Mormon are fictional and the geography is make-believe. The Book of Mormon is NOT a Bible. Tator is correct.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Kishkumen »

Shulem wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:42 pm
Many of the characters in the Bible were real people. The geography is also real. All of the characters of the Book of Mormon are fictional and the geography is make-believe. The Book of Mormon is NOT a Bible. Tator is correct.
Neither one of you are right. Many of the characters in the Bible are made up, or their lives are so heavily mythologized that it hardly matters.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Tator
Valiant A
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:51 am
Location: Pacific Coast

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Tator »

There really is a Sea of Galilee in the Bible, where is Zarahemla?
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Kishkumen »

Tator wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:51 pm
There really is a Sea of Galilee in the Bible, where is Zarahemla?
You guys are barking up the wrong tree. There is no simple split between Bible:factual; novel:fictional.

The Book of Mormon was obviously written to emulate the Bible, or, in other words, to be an American Bible. It fits the formal characteristics of the Bible well enough to qualify as such, in my opinion. It was Smith’s decision to take the Bible as his generic model, and he wrote his Bible accordingly. He did not call it a novel, nor did he seek to write a novel.

All you guys are doing here is picking up sad and outworn Christian anti-Mormon tropes when they are of no use to you. I doubt either of you thinks the Bible is sacrosanct, so what are you protecting it from? It makes a lot more sense to recognize as factual what is clearly the case: Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon as an American Bible.
"I have learned with what evils tyranny infects a state. For it frustrates all the virtues, robs freedom of its lofty mood, and opens a school of fawning and terror, inasmuch as it leaves matters not to the wisdom of the laws, but to the angry whim of those who are in authority.”
Tator
Valiant A
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:51 am
Location: Pacific Coast

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Tator »

Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon as an American Bible.

So is it fiction or non-fiction?
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7603
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Shulem »

Kishkumen wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:49 pm
Shulem wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 3:42 pm
Many of the characters in the Bible were real people. The geography is also real. All of the characters of the Book of Mormon are fictional and the geography is make-believe. The Book of Mormon is NOT a Bible. Tator is correct.
Neither one of you are right. Many of the characters in the Bible are made up, or their lives are so heavily mythologized that it hardly matters.

I am right when I said many of the characters in the Bible were real people. Kings of Egypt are also mentioned. The Book of Mormon characters are fiction, all fake. Bible geography is real. Book of Mormon geography is based on imagination using Delmarva.
User avatar
Shulem
God
Posts: 7603
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:40 am
Location: Facsimile No. 3

Re: Shulem challenges RFM’s magical powers

Post by Shulem »

Tator wrote:
Sat Mar 26, 2022 4:22 pm
Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon as an American Bible.

So is it fiction or non-fiction?

Pure fiction. All fake. Not real. Fantasy. Lies.
Post Reply