Plea to support DCPs blog

[Moksha]

They will conduct the Seder, as it would be inappropriate for me to enact their sacred rituals.

Ritual Schmitual, forget the bitter herbs and have a glass of Mogen David.

[Marcus]

Oh my gosh. Daniel now thinks he was a victim of cancel culture:

“But it’s important to take a stand for civility, and against tribalism and what’s come to be called “cancel culture.” Yet again, thank you! You’re all very kind.”


He also reasserted that there are no more than two individuals on the planet who dislike him. The individual who supposedly sends him 4 emails a day, and the malevolent stalker who runs this forum.


I’d like to thank both of you for making this forum such an achievement, it must be hard playing literally dozens and dozens of individual people who dislike and disagree with DP.

I don’t see why he hasn’t reported his accusations to the police, or arranged with Patheos to block this abuse:

And my Malevolent Stalker — who may or may not be an altogether distinct individual from my anonymous hate-mailer and from this blog’s multiple-personality down-voter — has maintained his implacable fixation on me over at the Peterson Obsession Board for approximately fifteen years now.

Or maybe he has, and there is not quite the evidence DCP continues to allude to.

[drumdude]

Since he reads this forum, I'll offer him a piece of advice:

IP records can easily correlate the identities of anonymous emailers and posters unless they're particularly careful with their privacy. The police would be interested in the IP addresses of the type of emails he keeps whinging about. I'm guessing 1) he has received harassing emails but nowhere near the amount he claims and 2) there are a lot more than just one or two people who are posting legitimate low star ratings on his blog.

[DrStakhanovite]

Post-Menopausaul DCP sure is needy. Sending thots and prayers.

[Marcus]

Post-Menopausaul DCP sure is needy. Sending thots and prayers.

Hey! Don’t disparage the post-menopausal. Peterson’s neediness was both pre- and post-whatever.

[Moksha]

1) he has received harassing emails but nowhere near the amount he claims and ...

No matter the amount, no one deserves to be getting harassing emails. It must be distressing for him. It is like any famous person getting such mail; they never know if John Hinckley will show up at their door.

[Dr. Shades]

No matter the amount, no one deserves to be getting harassing emails. It must be distressing for him.

I'm convinced it's Louis Midgley who sends him those.

[Moksha]

I'm convinced it's Louis Midgley who sends him those.

Perhaps his dossier on Dr. Peterson compels him to send the messages sub rosa.

[Doctor Scratch]

I see that DCP's latest post is sporting a 1-star rating. I bet he's real bummed about that. Like Dr. Stak, I send my "thots and prayers" in the hopes that Heavenly Father will help Dr. Peterson to understand why he's getting those low ratings.

Interestingly, in his new blog entry, he says that, quite contrary to orthodox Latter-day Saint belief, he believes in a literal hell. What do you want to bet that he hopes that anyone who gives him 1 star will be sent there?

Also, his streak of posting purely original material has come to an end, since he posted a long passage from another author. He lasted a couple of days at least.

[Marcus]

I noticed he banned Lance the Agnostic, because Lance gave 5 reviews, but none above 2 stars, even though Lance gave a reason every time for his reviews. (One 1-star review resulted because DCP literally used Lance’s disqus name in order to disparage him in the body of his blog entry.)

After an exchange where DCP stated he wanted people to give reviews from the heart, regardless of the number of stars given, DCP noted that Lance’s reviews averaged 1.4 stars, and therefore he would be banning him.