Buffalo wrote:Given his ability to instantly detect and comment on any mention of him here, my position is more reasonable than yours.
That doesn't make any sense, Buffalo. The quote that he questioned about last week was Scratch's sig for a month. he didn't comment on it until a month later after someone else notified him of the sig line. I haven't seen any reason to think you know whether he reads here and comments instantly at all. Indeed, since he vowed to not show up here he hasn't seemed to comment much on any of the many comments about him here. Odd, that you say otherwise but have nothing to prove your case.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
ETA: Listen to your friends, and take your own advice.
Last edited by Guest on Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
stemelbow wrote:Indeed, since he vowed to not show up here he hasn't seemed to comment much on any of the many comments about him here. Odd, that you say otherwise but have nothing to prove your case.
That's because they were dying out, and he needed to retrigger the sequence. However, now he's lost his podium, and MAD does not allow for references to this board anymore, all he has left to defend him is Stem. Now that is funny right there!
Buffalo wrote:Given his ability to instantly detect and comment on any mention of him here, my position is more reasonable than yours.
That doesn't make any sense, Buffalo. The quote that he questioned about last week was Scratch's sig for a month. he didn't comment on it until a month later after someone else notified him of the sig line. I haven't seen any reason to think you know whether he reads here and comments instantly at all. Indeed, since he vowed to not show up here he hasn't seemed to comment much on any of the many comments about him here. Odd, that you say otherwise but have nothing to prove your case.
DCP's commentary about the thread responding to his complaint proves my case.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
Dayum! Yet another unethical act by Dream Team Liz... !!
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
RockSlider wrote:That's because they were dying out, and he needed to retrigger the sequence. However, now he's lost his podium, and MAD does not allow for references to this board anymore, all he has left to defend him is Stem. Now that is funny right there!
That is funny. Wee little me offering a voice of reason in an otherwise sea of hostile presumption.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Buffalo wrote:DCP's commentary about the thread responding to his complaint proves my case.
Not at all. You have said "Given his ability to instantly detect and comment on any mention of him here" and "it's pretty obvious that DCP obsessively scans this board daily, looking for mention of his name".
If your case was to hold any merit, then there would not have been a month lapse between Scratch's sig line change to his new thread about the sig line. You see there was a mention of his name in Scratch's sig line, but it was a month before he commented. That was not instant detection nor instant comment at all.
Sure, since this flare up occurred he came on over to see what the fuss was about. No question on that.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
Buffalo wrote:DCP's commentary about the thread responding to his complaint proves my case.
Not at all. You have said "Given his ability to instantly detect and comment on any mention of him here" and "it's pretty obvious that DCP obsessively scans this board daily, looking for mention of his name".
If your case was to hold any merit, then there would not have been a month lapse between Scratch's sig line change to his new thread about the sig line. You see there was a mention of his name in Scratch's sig line, but it was a month before he commented. That was not instant detection nor instant comment at all.
Sure, since this flare up occurred he came on over to see what the fuss was about. No question on that.
It seems like a month-old quote was all DCP could find to complain about, since discussion of him had dwindled until he started his thread. Now he's gotten his wish - his name is brought up more often now.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
Buffalo wrote:It seems like a month-old quote was all DCP could find to complain about, since discussion of him had dwindled until he started his thread. Now he's gotten his wish - his name is brought up more often now.
Hey there. In the search function I typed in "Daniel C. Peterson". I was told I could not view results because the words were far to commonly used. I limited the search to the past month--same message. I put in DCP--same result for the past month. I put in Peterson--same result. I put in Dr. Peterson--same.
I don't buy this at all, Buffalo. It was a nice try though.
Love ya tons, Stem
I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
stemelbow wrote: Hey there. In the search function I typed in "Daniel C. Peterson". I was told I could not view results because the words were far to commonly used. I limited the search to the past month--same message. I put in DCP--same result for the past month. I put in Peterson--same result. I put in Dr. Peterson--same.
I don't buy this at all, Buffalo. It was a nice try though.
Exactly. That means that DCP can't simply use the search function to monitor the board - he must do so by reading it regularly.
You should know, however, that you're getting that result because he posted here for years, and people responded to him for years.
The following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common words: scratch. You must specify at least one word to search for. Each word must consist of at least 3 characters and must not contain more than 14 characters excluding wildcards.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.