Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

Tator wrote:I am proud to be referenced with Harmony.

I'm sure you are!

Liars of a feather ...
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_jon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1464
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _jon »

Will, yes or no - did you say this:

''Harmony is just bitter that the daily circle jerks in the Great and Spacious Trailer Park™ are the closest she has come to a bona fide sexual experience in over 40 years.

I simply cannot understand how her husband has resisted the urge to off himself for so long. Of all the men in human history who have felt compelled, no matter the cost, to “stick it out” with a bitch of a wife – Joseph Smith included – if anyone deserves the reward of 72 virgins in heaven, it’s that poor man.''
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)

Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
_Dad of a Mormon
_Emeritus
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:28 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Dad of a Mormon »

Let's put this in perspective, Will. The evidence of your misogyny based on posts you are known to have written is devastating. An F--. It was a good strategic move on your part to ignore everything else and focus on the one claim that wasn't airtight. But creating doubt on that one issue hardly absolves you from the many misogynistic statements that are beyond dispute by anyone.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

jon:
Will, yes or no - did you say this:

''Harmony is just bitter that the daily circle jerks in the Great and Spacious Trailer Park™ are the closest she has come to a bona fide sexual experience in over 40 years.

I simply cannot understand how her husband has resisted the urge to off himself for so long. Of all the men in human history who have felt compelled, no matter the cost, to “stick it out” with a bitch of a wife – Joseph Smith included – if anyone deserves the reward of 72 virgins in heaven, it’s that poor man.''

LOL!

Yes. Yes, I did write that. Of course, it’s divorced from its context, like everything else has been. In its original context, it’s abundantly clear that it is a tongue-in-cheek (albeit sharply barbed) remark. But, no matter. It’s funny even on its own. A bit rough and cutting? Oh, yes. It was meant to be.

Is it evidence that I am a misogynist?

Not hardly.

Let me illustrate with a little story.

My wife and I are big fans of the Steven Spielberg/Tom Hanks produced miniseries Band of Brothers. In the first episode (“Currahee”) Easy Company is being forced to run up the mountain (“Currahee”) while the other companies get a break from training. As they are running up the hill, the following conversation takes place:

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: I'm gonna say something.

George Luz: To who?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Lieutenant Winters!

Richard Winters: What is it?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Permission to speak, sir.

Richard Winters: Granted.

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Sir, we got nine companies, sir.

Richard Winters: We do.

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Well, how come we're the only one marching every Friday night, twelve miles, full pack, in the pitch dark?

Richard Winters: Why do you think, Private Randleman?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Lieutenant Sobel hates us, sir.

Richard Winters: Lieutenant Sobel does not hate Easy Company, Private Randleman. He just hates you.

And so it is with me. I don’t dislike women. Not at all. I love and honor women and womanhood.

I just don’t like harmony.

Now, were harmony a typical example of what is good and honorable among women, things would be different. But she’s not. She’s a lying apostate shrew who takes every opportunity to denigrate Mormonism, its founder, and its adherents.

At any rate, I am and always have been an "equal opportunity" trash talker. I don't discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, or gender. In fact, I'm quite certain I have directed far more invective, percentage-wise, towards the men here than I ever have the women.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Buffalo »

Will Schryver wrote:jon:
Will, yes or no - did you say this:

''Harmony is just bitter that the daily circle jerks in the Great and Spacious Trailer Park™ are the closest she has come to a bona fide sexual experience in over 40 years.

I simply cannot understand how her husband has resisted the urge to off himself for so long. Of all the men in human history who have felt compelled, no matter the cost, to “stick it out” with a bitch of a wife – Joseph Smith included – if anyone deserves the reward of 72 virgins in heaven, it’s that poor man.''

LOL!

Yes. Yes, I did write that. Of course, it’s divorced from its context, like everything else has been. In its original context, it’s abundantly clear that it is a tongue-in-cheek (albeit sharply barbed) remark. But, no matter. It’s funny even on its own. A bit rough and cutting? Oh, yes. It was meant to be.

Is it evidence that I am a misogynist?

Not hardly.

Let me illustrate with a little story.

My wife and I are big fans of the Steven Spielberg/Tom Hanks produced miniseries Band of Brothers. In the first episode (“Currahee”) Easy Company is being forced to run up the mountain (“Currahee”) while the other companies get a break from training. As they are running up the hill, the following conversation takes place:

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: I'm gonna say something.

George Luz: To who?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Lieutenant Winters!

Richard Winters: What is it?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Permission to speak, sir.

Richard Winters: Granted.

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Sir, we got nine companies, sir.

Richard Winters: We do.

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Well, how come we're the only one marching every Friday night, twelve miles, full pack, in the pitch dark?

Richard Winters: Why do you think, Private Randleman?

Sgt. Denver 'Bull' Randleman: Lieutenant Sobel hates us, sir.

Richard Winters: Lieutenant Sobel does not hate Easy Company, Private Randleman. He just hates you.

And so it is with me. I don’t dislike women. Not at all. I love and honor women and womanhood.

I just don’t like harmony.

Now, were harmony a typical example of what is good and honorable among women, things would be different. But she’s not. She’s a lying apostate shrew who takes every opportunity to denigrate Mormonism, its founder, and its adherents.

At any rate, I am and always have been an "equal opportunity" trash talker. I don't discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, or gender. In fact, I'm quite certain I have directed far more invective, percentage-wise, towards the men here than I ever have the women.


If you don't wish to be branded as a misogynist, don't use misogynist language to attack women you perceive as your enemies. You can attack them without sexualizing them and then degrading them.

You're rather like someone who calls a black man the "n-word" then insists you're not racist - you just don't like that particular n***** (censoring is mine)
Last edited by Guest on Fri May 06, 2011 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Will Schryver wrote:I love and honor women and womanhood.

I just don’t like harmony.

... She’s a lying apostate shrew...


Hello,

As I said, it's not a matter of if, but when...

V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_jon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1464
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _jon »

'(Kimberly does remain somewhat famous [among a small circle of otherwise respected academics] on account of my descriptions of her having once squeezed her then more voluptuous spirit tabernacle into a slinky black three-sizes-too-small dress at the 2006 Exmormon Foundation conference in Salt Lake City, which I attended. One wouldn't have believed it possible to carry melons in a pair of thimbles suspended from a thread, but miracles happen almost every day in this jaded world of cynical disbelievers.)'

Will, did you write this? (yes or no)

If yes, did you write it because you like Kimberly or dislike her?
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)

Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Buffalo »

jon wrote:'(Kimberly does remain somewhat famous [among a small circle of otherwise respected academics] on account of my descriptions of her having once squeezed her then more voluptuous spirit tabernacle into a slinky black three-sizes-too-small dress at the 2006 Exmormon Foundation conference in Salt Lake City, which I attended. One wouldn't have believed it possible to carry melons in a pair of thimbles suspended from a thread, but miracles happen almost every day in this jaded world of cynical disbelievers.)'

Will, did you write this? (yes or no)

If yes, did you write it because you like Kimberly or dislike her?


I'm not sure how anyone could claim with a straight face that that quote isn't severely misogynist.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

jon wrote:'(Kimberly does remain somewhat famous [among a small circle of otherwise respected academics] on account of my descriptions of her having once squeezed her then more voluptuous spirit tabernacle into a slinky black three-sizes-too-small dress at the 2006 Exmormon Foundation conference in Salt Lake City, which I attended. One wouldn't have believed it possible to carry melons in a pair of thimbles suspended from a thread, but miracles happen almost every day in this jaded world of cynical disbelievers.)'

Will, did you write this? (yes or no)

Before this game goes on much further, I should note that I have never denied writing anything that I did, in fact, write. I do object to the spin placed on things I have said--divorcing the material from its original context and misrepresenting its meaning, etc.

That said, I did write the above paragraph (and I don't care who you are, it's funny -- LOL!). However, I have since concluded that, in all likelihood, the melon-carrying woman I saw at the Exmo Conference was not Kimberly Ann.

If yes, did you write it because you like Kimberly or dislike her?

I actually like Kimberly very much. I consider her an extremely beautiful, talented, and classy woman. I've spoken a little rough with her on this message board in the past (it is, after all, a rough place), but I have since apologized for some of that rough language. Despite our differences when it comes to the question of Mormonism, the fact is that she and I have much more in common than not. I think we have, to a great extent, identified some mutual interests upon which we can maintain a pleasant relationship. That is my desire, at least.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Will Schryver wrote: However, I have since concluded that, in all likelihood, the melon-carrying woman I saw at the Exmo Conference was not Kimberly Ann.

...



Hello,

He's the gift that keeps on giving...

V/R
Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Post Reply