Coggins7 wrote:No twat, not weird. You were pushed on a mission just as I was, I am sure. Go or be ostracized, a hearty "F**k off" to anyone who says that boys aren't pressured to serve.
Wow! And I thought holy high horse%#&@ was bad.
So boys are pressured to serve? So what? That's one of the functions of culture and tradition; to place pressure on individuals to fulfill certain things expected of them within the group. Jews are expected and pressured to have their Bar Mitzvah, and Catholics parents pressure their sons and daughters to attend Mass, CCD, and other religious responsibilities. And, after all, its not as if serving a mission is a bad thing. What would you have done otherwise Mercury? The time you spend on this board bashing the Church indicates you've got as much wasted time on your hands now as you did then.
There are a vast plethora of other pressures in the world bearing upon young men, many of them far less wholesome than serving a mission.
How about a critique of them, Marcury?
---------------
It appears that Mercury was offering part of an ultimately painful experience which he had.
In that, he was not attempting to present analysis of what various religious organizations do or fail to do with or to their youth.
The “so what” is a question which I posed to Runtu, a question of ethical conduct of religious organizations. What to do when responsibility to youth conflicts with goals and objectives of a religious organization is an issue.
From what I have observed, “serving a mission”
is a bad thing. It’s bad particularly if it is a roadblock to other interests, goals, and talents of people who have a contribution to make. Parroting religious dogma or being pressured to do so has much potential to damage if not destroy the talents and productive contributions which an individual might make.
Not knowing Mercury’s age, he may offer contribution here as he sounds an alarm for others who might escape his fate in his youth.
Surely, Mercury deserves praise, not criticism, for being open and honest about his own experiences with a religious organization. Nor does Mercury have any obligation in a discussion here to detail ethical concerns with religious organizations for which he may be less familiar.
This is not to suggest that
all other religious power-structures escape scrutiny. Without doubt, they deserve surveillance.
JAK