Peterson at it again, blasting away in the comments

[_Simon Belmont]

I smell a turd, smells like Belmont...

Nothing stinks up a thread worse than DCP than Simon does.

C'mon Infymus...

What did DCP do to you? What was so bad that you have to stalk him and relentlessly attack him for years. Let's have it; what did DCP do to you?

Also, I don't consider .0077 of all the comments "blasting away" in the comments. Do you?

[_thews]

It has. Lots of times.
What you mean is, it hasn't been proven false to YOU.

Show me where? If it's been "lots of times" surely you will have no problem pointing me to something that definitively demonstrates the church is false.

The many threads you've left when you were cornered should prove it to you. You have the same schtick the other apologists have, and that's to just leave a thread once you have no other outs. Let me prove it to you... you claimed there was evidence to prove the historicity in Mormonism, but only offered links to tangled web sites as your evidence. What exactly are you claiming is tangible evidence (please be specific) that proves the church is true? You can either back up what you said, acknowledge there isn't any evidence you claimed exists, ask me a question in response, or tuck tail again.

[_Infymus]

Simon I don't care what you think nor what you post. So as always, “F” off.

[_Simon Belmont]

Simon I don't care what you think nor what you post. So as always, f*** off.

I'm sorry that no one calls you out on your BS except me.

What did DCP do to you to deserve years of Internet stalking, libel, and outright attacks from you?

How can anyone deserve such a thing?

[_Doctor Scratch]

Dr. Peterson isn't an "innocent," Simon. He's picked plenty of fights over the years. If you and other TBMs would call him on the carpet, we might one day live to see him actually humbling himself and apologizing for the many crappy things he's done over the years. If Dr. Peterson was legitimately humble and Christ-like, he wouldn't have enemies like Infymus.

[_jon]

Simon, a few points to clarify.

You seem to have avoided answering my question to you about whether or not you believe that Infymus has the exact same rights as DCP. Yes or No?

You have also avoided answering my question to you about whether or not you believe that Infymus has breached those rights. Yes or No?
(you can ignore this question if you answered No to the first one)

You seem to be whining about the OP which you think is Infymus whining about DCP. Can you possibly see the irony in that?

You seem to be suggesting that there is a threshold on the number of posts that can be whined about. Is there an actual numerical threshold, beyond which you believe whining to be acceptable?
If not, why do you whine so much?

You ask me to provide you with specific examples of where the Church has been proven false to you. I can't, because the Church has never been proven false to you.
I can provide you with an extremely long list of examples of where the Church has been proven false to literally billions of other people - but there's no point. What matters is what it would take for you to believe the Church to be false.
So, Simon, what would it take?

I've asked you direct and specific questions, most of which only require a clear yes or no. Let's see if you answer them in the same manner...

[_DrW]

Simon I don't care what you think nor what you post. So as always, f*** off.

I'm sorry that no one calls you out on your BS except me.

What did DCP do to you to deserve years of Internet stalking, libel, and outright attacks from you?

How can anyone deserve such a thing?

Simon,

I think you might be surprised at the depth and breadth of the animosity that DCP has generated towards himself and the LDS Church on the internet.

If you took the time to look, you would find a lot of people who have an active and often expressed dislike for DCP. Among LDS apologists, even Will Schriver, with his sexual innuendos, open distain for women and bad apologetics, does not even come close to DCP in terms of animosity generated.

Some of DCP's detractors are prolific and quite articulate. For example, the writings of a certain female moderator on exmormonforums and former contributor to postmormon.org concerning DCP make the observations of Dr. Scratch appear kind and empathetic in comparison. If you like, I could probably dig up a few odes to DCP and some other far less flattering material than is generated by Dr. Scratch. If you were really interested in the general public's reaction to DCP, you would have already done so yourself.

So before you ask how anyone can deserve such a thing, perhaps some reading and research to find out what dozens or even hundreds of people on the internet have to say about DCP, and the reasons they have to say it, might be in order.

[_stemelbow]

Hey Jon. Here ya go: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17234&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=nomad&start=84

Happy reading.

[_stemelbow]

Why is it that I always have to show you what you actually said? Again you would do better to use substance as to why they are wrong, but I have noticed you don't seem interested.

Hey there, Themis, I'm not really interested in playing your games again. I did nto say my first post in this thread was where I addressed the reasons why exhaustively. I thought the post that started this thread spoke for itself so when I first replied I did so snarkily, assuming most would get that. Apparently you and Buffalo didn't get that (although to Buffalo's credit he got it after I pointed it out.)

Anyway, take care. I'm sorry you're so beside yourself about me. I'll probably maintain my position of pointing out foolishness or calling people out when I see fit. You can continue to complain about me when I do so, ignoring the original offender all you like in some weird game of going after the LDS dude.

[_jon]

Hey Jon. Here ya go: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17234&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=nomad&start=84

Happy reading.

Stem, thanks, I've read it but perhaps I'm being a bit dim today. Can you quote the specific post(s) where you call someone out for whining?

Cheers