The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Droopy »

LDSToronto wrote:Stem,

Would you please shut the f*** up about the whining that you witness. Point taken in the previous 10 billion f*****g posts you've made about the same goddamned thing.

H.



Then there are leftist sillies like Toronto who's belief system is roughly 97% emotion based, and who demonstrates this time and time again, when given the opportunity.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Drifting »

Droopy wrote:Then there are Mormon sillies like Droopy whose belief system is roughly 99.9% emotion based, and who demonstrates this time and time again, when given the opportunity during fast and testimony meeting.


I may have underestimated the percentage in this quote by 0.1
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _canpakes »

stemelbow wrote:Michael Shermer on atheism:

"But this is not the common usage, as we saw in the Oxford English Dictionary. (And we would do well to remember that dictionaries do not give definitions, they give usages.) Atheism is typically used to mean "disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a God" (not to mention its pejorative permutations). But "denial of a God" is an untenable position. it is no more possible to prove God's nonexistence than it is to prove His existence. "there is no God" is no more defensible than "there is a God." How We Believe : Science, Skepticism, and the search for God, Michael Shermer, 2nd Ed, pg 9.

He puts it in a way that I find most compelling. If you assume the atheist position you assume the burden to prove it. The funny thing in all of this, or mixed up thing if you prefer, is that atheists typically don't believe because they find the notion of belief untenable. Belief in God is untenable therefore I see no reason to believe but the mistake is to make a claim of one's own--that there is no God. As Shermer suggests one cannot disprove the existence of God just as one can't prove such existence. The position of atheism is untenable, but the atheist typically surrenders to that position because he/she finds belief untenable. What a weird position to find oneself in, I'd say. The out for believers is the reason for belief is in faith (meaning the experiences they consider spiritual provide reason to believe), but for atheists they are stuck having to rely on verifyable scientific methods and reasoning to prove his/her position, which is impossible to do. So what we're left with is two untenable positions, one, ultimately with an out, the other filled with hypocrisy, it seems.

This is quite like unto the whining exhibited here regarding LDS folks and LDS defenders. The complaint here is that the LDS defender is merely critiquing a critique of an LDS position, and therefore the LDS defender isn’t supporting his/her position—the positive claims of the Church. And yet, the original critique offered of LDS belief is untenable, as reasoned by the LDS defender. The critics position is untenable, while claiming LDS belief can’t be right because its untenable.

There ya are folks—the very problem you guys have created and have been unwilling and/or unwilling to see or accept.


Stem -

You're conflating "belief in a God" with "belief in an LDS position".

These can be two very different things, and usually are.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Droopy »

The LDS position is that God exists.
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Buffalo »

Droopy wrote:The LDS position is that God exists....


... to take the blame for Joseph.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_LDSToronto
_Emeritus
Posts: 2515
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:11 am

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _LDSToronto »

Droopy wrote:
LDSToronto wrote:Stem,

Would you please shut the f*** up about the whining that you witness. Point taken in the previous 10 billion f*****g posts you've made about the same goddamned thing.

H.



Then there are leftist sillies like Toronto who's belief system is roughly 97% emotion based, and who demonstrates this time and time again, when given the opportunity.


I know, right? I spend many a night wishing I was more like you, all logical and factual and such. My pillow has spend many a night soaked in Droopy-induced tears.

H.
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir
_Hasa Diga Eebowai
_Emeritus
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 8:57 am

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Hasa Diga Eebowai »

-
Last edited by Guest on Sun Jul 13, 2014 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Droopy »

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn...
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Congrats on reading a book Stem! Step in the right direction.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: The lack of logic that encompasses this joint

Post by _Kishkumen »

DarkHelmet wrote:That's why I'm agnostic. The question of whether or not there is a supreme intellectual being, or beings, controlling the universe is beyond our knowledge. However, I am sympathetic to the atheist position because all the religions that have been invented so far are stupid.


I am very sympathetic to this point of view. Many popular conceptions of God ought to be considered blasphemous because they are so vile. The problems present in the Bible are difficult to get around. It is much easier to think of it as manmade and chuck the whole thing. To just say, "stop the madness now," is very appealing.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
Post Reply