M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _Kishkumen »

Wiki Wonka wrote:This type of nonsensical post is representative of why I believe that apologetics have no place on message boards. This attitude completely contradicts the scriptures and everything that we are taught in Church. I wish that every online LDS poster was like M&G.

You have absolutely got to be kidding me.

WW


Another apostate from the gospel according to why me.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _consiglieri »

why me wrote: And if they do so, they must wear cotton candy gloves.


Why do all discussions with you end up involving cotton?
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_lostindc
_Emeritus
Posts: 2380
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _lostindc »

Whyme has to be trolling. Not one person would willfully drag themself through the mud and pull a Bill O'rielly act at the same time. A person cannot be this delusional and dumb and not be a message board character. So who is the poster here that is pretending to be a character named whyme in order to make MAD posters look even more ridiculous?
2019 = #100,000missionariesstrong
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _Buffalo »

why me wrote:
Buffalo wrote:
You mean because she won't attack the people you want her to attack?

This is rich coming from an inactive creep who ejaculates on women through light cotton and has deep connections in the porn industry.


Mercyngrace can you please tell buffalo about mercy and grace toward posters? Now you can see what bashing is. :eek:


You're a creep who harasses women. Mercy & Grace is much nicer than me, but I'm going to tell you exactly what I think of you. Suck it up, buttercup.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _Chap »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wiki Wonka wrote:This type of nonsensical post is representative of why I believe that apologetics have no place on message boards. This attitude completely contradicts the scriptures and everything that we are taught in Church. I wish that every online LDS poster was like M&G.

You have absolutely got to be kidding me.

WW


Another apostate from the gospel according to why me.


"Whyme dost thou see them
On the holy ground
How the troops of Midian
Prowl and prowl around?
Whyme up and smite them! ..."
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_RayAgostini

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _RayAgostini »

_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _why me »

MsJack wrote:Says the man who attacked my pastor, called my believing LDS husband an "anti-Mormon," and claimed that I'm the kind of Protestant who would have violently persecuted and murdered Mormons in the 19th century.

.


Is your pastor the guy who just hosted an exmormon? I believe the church is located in Idaho: the Calvary Church? If I remember correctly, your church was called Calvery.
¨¨
I never called your believing husband an anti-mormon. In fact, I kinda feel sorry for him. But the protestants were involved in many human rights crimes and the persecution against Mormons were one of them. And with your current mindset about Mormons, you just may have persecuted them in the 19th century if you lived at that time. Likewise for others on this forum. The biggest persecutors were exmormons.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _why me »

Wiki Wonka wrote:
This type of nonsensical post is representative of why I believe that apologetics have no place on message boards. This attitude completely contradicts the scriptures and everything that we are taught in Church. I wish that every online LDS poster was like M&G.

You have absolutely got to be kidding me.

WW


Here was my problem:Mercyngrace came to MDD and lectured the defenders about behavior and higher standards. But she refuses to give the same lecture to the critics here. Thus, my problem. Being a critic does not give one the permission to lower their standards to an ape. Likewise, defenders of Mormonism can take to task critics for bashing or mocking the LDS church. And they can certainly engage them in hard hitting debate without a lecture from Mercyngrace.

And that was my point. I have not seen Mercyngrace defend the LDS church against the critics on this board. But since I am not monitoring her posts, she may have done so. But I haven't seen it.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _Buffalo »

why me wrote:
MsJack wrote:Says the man who attacked my pastor, called my believing LDS husband an "anti-Mormon," and claimed that I'm the kind of Protestant who would have violently persecuted and murdered Mormons in the 19th century.

.


Is your pastor the guy who just hosted an exmormon? I believe the church is located in Idaho: the Calvary Church? If I remember correctly, your church was called Calvery.
¨¨
I never called your believing husband an anti-mormon. In fact, I kinda feel sorry for him. But the protestants were involved in many human rights crimes and the persecution against Mormons were one of them. And with your current mindset about Mormons, you just may have persecuted them in the 19th century if you lived at that time. Likewise for others on this forum. The biggest persecutors were exmormons.


Mormons persecuted more protestants than vice versa. You're still persecuting them.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: M&G Lays Some Serious Smack Down on Why Me

Post by _why me »

Carton wrote:I admit I have not read that thread very closely, but I kind of got the impression that MnG was implicitly "laying some smack down" on DCP and FARMS too, without actually naming names.


I think so too. Which is why she is open game for me to challenge.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
Post Reply