Blogger interviews dude who posted temple ceremony..Romney

[_Eric]

Mike also runs these sites:

5. crimmigrants.org
6. daniellebreman.com
7. denytheholocaust.com
8. mcipdns.com
9. mcipdns.information
10. whiteprideforever.com
11. whiteprideforever.information
12. theholocaustwasfake.com
13. racismworks.com
1. kaitlyncrook.com
2. mcomike.com
3. michaelcrook.com

When he's not "interviewing" bloggers. The worst part about this guy isn't the fact that he attacked the posters on this thread for being Mormon (even though only critics have responded), or that he is a creepy pedo-looking professional troll who was at one point considered the most hated person online, no, for me it is that this guy dares to call himself a writer. That 21-page rant the OP linked to (and has since been mercifully put out of its misery) shows just what an insult to writers and readers such a claim is.

[_ldsdreams]

Actually, if you did your homework, you'd know that that list, from michaelcrook.blogspot.com, is outdated, like to the tune of 2005. Crook only owns, out of that list, mcomike.com. So, you fail for not doing your research, but merely sticking your nose high in the air, cutting and pasting like a moron.

Again, read this:

http://www.michaelcrook.org/2012/07/24/ ... -for-life/

You have wilfully, maliciously and intentionally ignored the fact that he abandoned those sorts of things years and years ago. No, you think forgiveness is all about you, you, you and only you. [personal attack deleted]. By your logic, you should be held to things you did 6, 7, 10 years ago, and never forgiven for them. That's what you expect of others, obviously.

And the only reason you didn't like that article is because it's "anti-Mormon." Quit being bitter.

[_Eric]

Again, read this:

http://www.michaelcrook.org/2012/07/24/ ... -for-life/

TL;DR

If you want any one to read anything you write you'll need to learn a word: brevity.

And the only reason you didn't like that article is because it's "anti-Mormon." Quit being bitter.

Listen, Napoleon Dynamite: you're overselling yourself. First, we're pretty much all ex-Mormons on this forum. Second, whether or not your blog post is "anti-Mormon" is of little consequence as I doubt ten people have managed to read it all the way through. It's dull, crappy, and just a mess of nonsense. That's why I loathe it and you and all the other freak shows that Mike Norton associates with. Dull, crappy nonsense.

[Guest]

.

[_ldsdreams]

TL;DR

If you want any one to read anything you write you'll need to learn a word: brevity.

First of all, you're not talking to the author. What don't you get? Secondly, TL;DR is another way to say, "I have an attention disorder and can't read unless it's quick, because I'm that poorly educated!" Seriously, the temple article was NOT that long, and the article about moving on from previous sorts of writing was DEFINITELY not that long. Are we now in a society where everything must be two or three paragraphs because people were so poorly educated they read at a level of second-grade attention span? If so, that's sad.

As for your "dull crappy nonsense" remark, I'm sorry something happened to you in your childhood that made you have such hatred. In your heart. Either that, or you've sinned to the point that you're lashing out at others. Your bishop can help with that.

[Guest]

.

[_ldsdreams]

Awww he said we are uneducated and have ADD...should we cry now?
Actually TL;DR means that it isn't worth wasting time to read something with little to no redeeming value. In this case...accurate.

Which you wouldn't know unless you read the whole thing. Just glancing at something and whining, "TL;DR" is the same as saying, "I didn't earn my high school diploma. I still read at a fourth-grade level." Sorry, but for me, TL;DR level isn't until about 1,500 pages. Sorry you can't get through 21 pages-- and not even 21 FULL pages-- without whining about TL;DR.

[_Kishkumen]

If your writing is dreadful, you should at least have the good grace to make it brief.

[_ldsdreams]

If your writing is dreadful, you should at least have the good grace to make it brief.

Apparently, the truth hurts. Seems to me the article was an apt indictment of TSCC and a good assessment of the video. Why he turned traitor and went to help TSCC is beyond me.

[Guest]

.