Shulem wrote:One this is for sure. When it comes to taking down Mormonism, the end justifies the GODDMAMN means!
Then I guess you really don’t have a problem with lies. I will disregard all of your claims to the contrary.
Shulem wrote:One this is for sure. When it comes to taking down Mormonism, the end justifies the GODDMAMN means!
Kishkumen wrote:Shulem wrote:One this is for sure. When it comes to taking down Mormonism, the end justifies the GODDMAMN means!
Then I guess you really don’t have a problem with lies. I will disregard all of your claims to the contrary.
Kishkumen wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:What does it matter if Norton advertised his friendship with Reel on Facebook? We don't know what Reel has to say about the relationship do we?
That he entered the building to record doesn't implicate Reel.
I think the situation speaks for itself.
Let the one who has ears hear. I imagine that if I were wrong about this someone close to Reel would have corrected me by now. I’m not wrong.
It’s OK. I get it. The Church is bad, so screw them, right?
Bill is only human. He has made some mistakes. No biggie. I think he has a cool and fun podcast.
At the same time, I am unimpressed with the whole DC show. I view it as a setup. Bill wanted his martyrdom and he got it. He took advantage of the Church’s process to make his own statement.
It could have been more powerful had it not turned into an ex-Mo testimony meeting and Norton prank. But obviously I was not the target audience. Nor were the Mormons who need enlightening.
The target audience was all of those people who are already heavily leaning in or fully converted to the idea that the Church is BS and that “woke” folks will march out the door to enjoy eternal Second Saturdays and the occasional vigil for the next holy witness to the anti-LDS “truth.”
Shulem wrote:I lived a lie for many years thanks to the church. What’s one more little lie?
Wars are not easily won. Taking down Mormonism is a messy business.
Jersey Girl wrote:I think that "the whole DC show" might be of more value than you think.
Sanctorian wrote:Geez kish, I just don’t get it. Some dude decides to record his made up court about a made up religion and post it online. He enlists a known anti-Mormon to help him out. No laws were broken. No one was harmed. Big deal. I get it’s not how you would've handled it, but seriously, why the vitriol?
Kishkumen wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:I didn't see where we have evidence that Bill Reel approved, invited or enlisted Norton's help. Has someone confirmed that? Link please.
Maybe it is a complete coincidence that Mike Norton advertised his friendship with Bill Reel on Facebook one week before he went to trespass and record Bill’s DC.
Sanctorian wrote:Geez kish, I just don’t get it. Some dude decides to record his made up court about a made up religion and post it online. He enlists a known anti-Mormon to help him out. No laws were broken. No one was harmed. Big deal. I get it’s not how you would've handled it, but seriously, why the vitriol?