Darth J wrote:Did I mention that we're not a cult?
The cult of DJ with his angry disciples.
Darth J wrote:Did I mention that we're not a cult?
stemelbow wrote:Darth J wrote:Did I mention that we're not a cult?
The cult of DJ with his angry disciples.
stemelbow wrote:Molok wrote:God, you're such a one note dip****. It's not even worth the effort to creatively insult you anymore.
Why would you ever want to insult someone anyway, Molok?
Darth J wrote:You know, Liz, one time a police officer pulled me over for going 40 in a 25 mph zone. And I said, "Yeah, but the speed limit doesn't apply if you are going to the grocery store." And he said, "The sign says 25 mph." And then I said, "But I needed to see if I left the iron on at home." And he said, "The sign says 25 mph." And I said, "But I really needed to go 40 mph." And he said, "The sign says 25 mph."
This went on for a while, and then I told him, "You're just saying I went over the speed limit because you don't like me, and I think you're being disrespectful for accusing me of violating the speed limit just because the sign says 25 and I was going 40."
And guess what? He finally agreed that the posted speed limit didn't mean that you are only allowed to go 25 mph where I had been driving! Yay!!!!
Molok wrote:It's because even though I've never been a Mormon, I enjoy reading this forum
Molok wrote:Even better Ceeboo, I'm an ex fundie Christian!
Molok wrote:*
Darth J wrote:There is nothing in LDS Church policy that gives the bishop over a given ward authority to police total strangers who claim to be bishops, over whom the bishop has no ecclesiastical authority whatsoever, because the bishop feels that this stranger is somehow acting outside of conformity with how a bishop should act. This particular apologia of yours would have it that bishops are watching over the world at large on the Church's behalf.
Not only do LDS policy and doctrine (e.g., that book abbreviated as "D&C") not support this assertion, it would mean that LDS bishops decide for themselves what is or is not within the scope of their role as bishop over a given ward. That would make the revocable license agreement---which is a legal document, not a religious document---totally meaningless.