beastie wrote:And it's obvious to me you have no idea what you're talking about in regards to Moniker.
Not at all an unusual circumstance with Marg.
The proof is in the pudding with regards to Moniker, she's the one getting pm's from men, who apparently think of her as a whore. Are you getting those sorts of pm's Harmony? So why is she getting that sort of response and you aren't. So she's obviously doing something to warrant the sort of responses she's getting off the board. On the board I don't see any of the men behaving inappropriately.
They think I'm a whore 'cause I was an exotic dancer. That's all it is. I'm 100% of it.
Should I not have said I was an exotic dancer when they were being stereotyped and being ridiculed? Maybe? But, I felt I wanted to step up and set the record straight.
The proof is in the pudding with regards to Moniker, she's the one getting pm's from men, who apparently think of her as a whore. Are you getting those sorts of pm's Harmony? So why is she getting that sort of response and you aren't. So she's obviously doing something to warrant the sort of responses she's getting off the board. On the board I don't see any of the men behaving inappropriately.
You are utterly clueless.
I'm sure it has nothing to do with your one most prominent characteristic - knee-jerk defense of JAK.
by the way, I provided specific examples from past boards to demonstrate my point already.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
marg wrote:I didn't read your blog Moniker, but you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.
You've told me before I'm obsessed with sex. Are you aware that I can be talking about buying boots and men post pictures of me saying they think of me as a seductress? That I get PMs from men on this website. That men have asked me to meet them somewhere and screw? No, you probably weren't aware of that!
I do more posts that are meant to be sexually titillating than KA, Liz, GIMR, Shmo, Scottie, Bond, Will, Bedme(oops) Bednar??? (those are off the top of my head) -- no, I do not!
Quite simply Moniker you bring it on yourself and you play the victim. You do frequently write posts which are suggestive, which make it clear you play fast and loose in life, so don't be surprised when men respond as they have with you. You need to change, if you want a different response or you don't want to attract the sorts of responses you've been getting in pm's. And a tip, don't reveal your life on message boards. Don't be so intimate with people you don't know if it is going to bother you the way they respond to you.
I'm just going to bold the parts of this post that are relevant to the topic. Note, that I am not using this post as a blanket condemnation of LDS men. Just pointing out what I see as relevant in this case.
antishock8 wrote:I will now enlighten everyone with my brilliant insight. Ready?
LDS people, in genereal, are among the red neckiest people in the world. From potluck (popularity of Jell-O and Cream of Whatever Concoction) to all the stupid s*** they wear to church on Sundays (and I'm talkin' K-Mart shirts, brown nylon slacks, and clip-on ties), they're ill-mannered in general. They lack culture and appropriate boundaries found throughout polite society. Sometimes they're exposed to culture because of their missions, but they think they're better than that culture because of their religious ideology. You take stupid uncultured assholes and tell them they're better than everyone... Well, they just don't know how to act.
So. Combine that with men are being told that they're going to be gods, that they have authority over their women, that they have more power in their pinky finger than the President. Does it surprise anyone that LDS and ex-LDS men are objectify women like s***? 12 year-old boys are being told they're going to rule over their own planets, and does it really surprise anyone that these boys turn into men with no sense of propriety? That s*** you saw bein' rounded up in El Dorado was NOT far from what would be going down with LDS guys if they hadn't had their pee-pees smacked down. Dudes are dirty. Men are dogs. Throw Mormonism on top that and it's like throwing moonshine on a bondfire. The damn rednecks start a whoopin' and a hollerin'.
Anyway, you take their restrictions on what's a sin and what isn't, because they're such social retards they just run wild. Like a bull in a candy shop! <-Ha. That's some serious metaphor-mixing. You see that? That was awesome.
When Mormon and ex-Mormon women respond they a) like the attention and b) are experiencing social retardation, too. It's kind of like when some silly skank-ho and her ho friend ho it up in front of a bar or camera. Everyone goes crazy. They also happen to be largely in their 20's. They dudes going crazy have popped collars and sideways caps. The ho's have spray-on tans and bleached hair. They're young. They get that out of their system. The ex-Mo's generally haven't had that Spring Break experience, and don't understand why it's ridiculous to ho it up on a message board, or at 30-something parties, or... Well, you get the point.
Sincerely,
Professor AntiShock8 (I'm just over here keepin' it reaaaahl)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
marg wrote:I didn't read your blog Moniker, but you seem to focus much more on sex than any of the posters here, including the men.
You've told me before I'm obsessed with sex. Are you aware that I can be talking about buying boots and men post pictures of me saying they think of me as a seductress? That I get PMs from men on this website. That men have asked me to meet them somewhere and screw? No, you probably weren't aware of that!
I do more posts that are meant to be sexually titillating than KA, Liz, GIMR, Shmo, Scottie, Bond, Will, Bedme(oops) Bednar??? (those are off the top of my head) -- no, I do not!
Quite simply Moniker you bring it on yourself and you play the victim. You do frequently write posts which are suggestive, which make it clear you play fast and loose in life, so don't be surprised when men respond as they have with you. You need to change, if you want a different response or you don't want to attract the sorts of responses you've been getting in pm's. And a tip, don't reveal your life on message boards. Don't be so intimate with people you don't know if it is going to bother you the way they respond to you.
I write about sexuality in a blunt manner. If a man can't handle a woman talking about sexuality without thinking I'm coming on to him he has issues. I'm not playing the victim -- it happens. I posted in a thread once and a man out of the blue said something about how turned on he was about my blog. I was humiliated. Another time I'm posting about boots and a man posts a picture of a seductress and says that's what he thinks of about me. Another time I'm posting about whatever and tumult posts something suggestive. I'm talking about being on skype and a man comes behind me saying they wish they could see my boobs or something of that sort -- I did NOT know how to handle it, at times. I was confused and overwhelmed. I should have told them to back the hell off, but, I was uncomfortable doing so and quite frankly did NOT know how to stand up for myself at that point in my life.
I think I did bring some of the behavior on by not being more assertive and telling them to back the hell off. I do that now.
I don't reveal ANYTHING about my real life on other message boards. It was a poooor decision to do it on this one. No doubt about it. Yet, if others can't handle dealing with a woman that was a stripper without thinking she wants to screw any nimrod then they need to check their stereotypes.
beastie wrote:And it's obvious to me you have no idea what you're talking about in regards to Moniker.
Not at all an unusual circumstance with Marg.
The proof is in the pudding with regards to Moniker, she's the one getting pm's from men, who apparently think of her as a whore. Are you getting those sorts of pm's Harmony? So why is she getting that sort of response and you aren't. So she's obviously doing something to warrant the sort of responses she's getting off the board. On the board I don't see any of the men behaving inappropriately.
You have no idea what kind of pm's I get. I don't talk about them. I only frequent LDS boards, so I have no reference about non-LDS men. I find that men can discuss sexual subjects without straying off into the inappropriate, if they are sufficiently motivated. Unfortunately, that happens only rarely and few men are stable enough to pull it off. I don't know if it has something to do with upbringing or simply a gender thing. I'm reminded of the new Brad Paisley song, I'm Still a Guy.
Moniker wrote: They think I'm a whore 'cause I was an exotic dancer. That's all it is. I'm 100% of it.
Should I not have said I was an exotic dancer when they were being stereotyped and being ridiculed? Maybe? But, I felt I wanted to step up and set the record straight.
From my perspective, Moniker, despite that you've revealed you were an exotic dancer, which of course would lead men to think you are loose, but had you not mentioned that on the board, you still come across as wanting to attract attention from men to you sexually. You appear to want that attention. Take if for what it is worth, you appear to want that attention. Just how you responded to Will in this thread is an example.
You say to him :
Will, about the goddess suite and my supposed sexual hangups or being uptight. The goddess suite bores the hell out of me.
I don't role play on the internet and I certainly don't get turned on by others that do so. Here's a lil clue for you Will -- I don't do sex with a giggle snort, or in a way that is like a teen prepubscent fantasy. You see, Will, I'm quite content with my sexuality and my experience and don't have to pretend that I can live some marvelous sex life on the internet. I live my sex life in the real world.
That you get excited about it makes me think you haven't. :)
Moniker wrote: They think I'm a whore 'cause I was an exotic dancer. That's all it is. I'm 100% of it.
Should I not have said I was an exotic dancer when they were being stereotyped and being ridiculed? Maybe? But, I felt I wanted to step up and set the record straight.
From my perspective, Moniker, despite that you've revealed you were an exotic dancer, which of course would lead men to think you are loose, but had you not mentioned that on the board, you still come across as wanting to attract attention from men to you sexually. You appear to want that attention. Take if for what it is worth, you appear to want that attention. Just how you responded to Will in this thread is an example.
You say to him :
Will, about the goddess suite and my supposed sexual hangups or being uptight. The goddess suite bores the hell out of me.
I don't role play on the internet and I certainly don't get turned on by others that do so. Here's a lil clue for you Will -- I don't do sex with a giggle snort, or in a way that is like a teen prepubscent fantasy. You see, Will, I'm quite content with my sexuality and my experience and don't have to pretend that I can live some marvelous sex life on the internet. I live my sex life in the real world.
That you get excited about it makes me think you haven't. :)
Why do you think Will cares about your sex life?
Will said I had sexual hangups and was uptight -- the POINT of this thread was Will acting INNAPROPRIATE to women on THIS website! I think men that come on the net and do giggles like their teen boys have ISSUES -- I was pointing out that I do NOT get sexually titillated by sexual innuendos that HE DOES. Do you understand that? Probably not.
You're still pissed 'cause I caught JAK plagiarizing, right, Marg? Get the “F” over it.
Do I have more sexually inappropriate posts in THIS thread than Liz does? That would be a NO! More than Doctor Shades? NO! Do I talk about sex like Will does? No, I do not!
I point out that I do NOT have sexual hangups (which I'm being accused of) and being uptight about sex and all of a sudden I'm the one that wants sexual attention.
That makes no god damn sense.
Last edited by Guest on Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
harmony wrote: You have no idea what kind of pm's I get. I don't talk about them.
I see so men are pm'ing you as if you are a whore..ok. You too then are doing something wrong
I only frequent LDS boards, so I have no reference about non-LDS men. I find that men can discuss sexual subjects without straying off into the inappropriate, if they are sufficiently motivated. Unfortunately, that happens only rarely and few men are stable enough to pull it off. I don't know if it has something to do with upbringing or simply a gender thing. I'm reminded of the new Brad Paisley song, I'm Still a Guy.
I don't know what your issues are Harmony. There is a problem with men on this board being inappropriate discussing sex? I must not have read some threads somewhere.