John Tvedtnes: Foul-mouthed Hatchet Man?

Post by **_antishock8** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:05 pm

How old is Bill? 48? And he lives in Cedar City? Am I right? Cedar City? Well, no wonder he knows so much about trailer parks, and vulgarity. I mean... He's 48 and lives in Cedar City. Jesus Christ. I'd be pissed, too.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:15 pm

Will wrote:He's mad, that trusts in the tameness of a wolf …

Ah...so I suppose trusting you would not be the sanest of moves? ;)

Post by **_William Schryver** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:25 pm

antishock8 wrote:How old is Bill? 48? And he lives in Cedar City? Am I right? Cedar City? Well, no wonder he knows so much about trailer parks, and vulgarity. I mean... He's 48 and lives in Cedar City. Jesus Christ. I'd be pissed, too.

'Tis better to be vile than vile esteemed,
When not to be receives reproach of being,
And the just pleasure lost, which is so deemed
Not by our feeling, but by others' seeing.

Post by **_William Schryver** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 7:34 pm

liz3564 wrote:
Will wrote:He's mad, that trusts in the tameness of a wolf …

Ah...so I suppose trusting you would not be the sanest of moves? ;)

Come closer my dear ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv6Cr5LZStE

Post by **_beastie** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:36 pm

Au contraire, mon ami. In point of fact, the things I have said have been poetry to the ears of many. At least that has been the general tenor of my private conversations with some who have followed this running exchange, including certain FARMS friends who, strangely enough, have not been able to perceive the same shame in the broad strokes of my “vulgar” posts as have more pious people like the righteous CK Salmon.

This is just as I would expect. Many of the MADdites also love Pahoran. You and Pahoran are their court jesters, who say what they would love to say themselves, but probiety stops them.

That's another reason I enjoy your demonstrations of vulgarity. It's more than a demonstration of your personal character, it really does reflect something about the frustration internet Mormons experience, that builds until it pops like a pustule. In fact, you and Pahoran are the pustules. The way you relish and glory in your vulgarity, along with the silent enjoyment of many believers, is the infection gone wild.

See? I can use figurative language, too.

Bring it on, baby. Fruits. More fruits.

Post by **_William Schryver** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:44 pm

beastlie:

This is just as I would expect. Many of the MADdites also love Pahoran. You and Pahoran are their court jesters, who say what they would love to say themselves, but probiety stops them.

Either that, or sobriety. (lol)

I think, dear beastlie, that perhaps you meant probity. But either way …

Bring it on, baby. Fruits. More fruits.

Will just the regular varieties suffice, or would you prefer the kind that make you wise?

Post by **_beastie** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 8:46 pm

Will just the regular varieties suffice, or would you prefer the kind that make you wise?

Your varieties.

And we critics don't even have to pay you for it. Sweet.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 10:28 pm

William Schryver wrote:
liz3564 wrote:
Will wrote:He's mad, that trusts in the tameness of a wolf …

Ah...so I suppose trusting you would not be the sanest of moves? ;)

Come closer my dear ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv6Cr5LZStE

I'm not that girl....

http://web.mac.com/escottmusicstudio/Si ... _Girl.html

Post by **_Mister Scratch** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 6:04 pm

Jason Bourne wrote:
Oh, and thanks for ignoring my question.

while I am not obligated to answer every question I did answer this one in another post when I saw I had missed it. Let me repeat. How I know about SHIELDS is none of your damn business really. Let's leave it at that.

No, Jason. Here you are accusing me of "overexaggeration," "conspiracy theory," and whatever else---all with no real analysis to back up your observations, BTW---and yet you won't answer a very simple question? Are you secretly an apologist, Jason? Or, are you a "retired" apologist, ala Runtu?

Post by **_Jason Bourne** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 1:11 am

No, Jason. Here you are accusing me of "overexaggeration," "conspiracy theory," and whatever else---all with no real analysis to back up your observations,

Such is life man. You will have to take my word for it. I believe I have a fair track record here of honesty in most my posts and being pretty decent most the time. If that is not good enough for you oh well.

BTW---and yet you won't answer a very simple question?

Not to you I won't. I do not trust you. Your track record is such that I have good reason not to.

Are you secretly an apologist, Jason?

Nope.

Or, are you a "retired" apologist, ala Runtu?

If you have have read any of my posts here I have not made it a secret that I used to fashion myself as a hobby apologist at one point in time though I don't think I was ever that good at it. I say that here because I have said it before here, many times. That is more than enough for you.