MAD un-bans posters!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
I finally got a response just b/f Christmas when I sent an individual PM to every moderator asking to have my account fixed so I could post again. One of them answered. He said I was banned so he would have to get with all the other mods and made a decision. Regarding being "banned" I said, "That's news to me because my account is active, I can read the board, I can vote in polls, I can send PMs to anybody I want -- I just get an error message when I try to post." The mod responded that whoever tried to ban me hadn't done it correctly. LOL Looks like the same thing happened to Bond.
I waited 8 months before sending PMs to all the moderators. Before that I contacted only a few moderators who seemed to be most active (Chaos, Nemesis, Orifice). They all ignored me. So I say give it a few weeks and then send a PM to all of them.
I waited 8 months before sending PMs to all the moderators. Before that I contacted only a few moderators who seemed to be most active (Chaos, Nemesis, Orifice). They all ignored me. So I say give it a few weeks and then send a PM to all of them.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
harmony wrote:rcrocket wrote:
Very insightful post.
Your posts evidence a certain amount of =====editorial edit from Harmony coming====> braindeadedness.
Not at all, Crock. You described my post, not my person. Insulting a post is fine; insulting the individual is not.
Interestingly, when opposing attorneys or adverse witnesses want to personally insult me they call me "Crock" in court, to my face, in depositions or in emails -- a play on "crock of s**t". It has been that way for over 20 years, all sorts of different people and circumstances; and here, you. It is interesting having a poster with hate-filled messages serving as a moderator. I still like you, even though I think you are unqualified to be posting on any matter of substance. A sort of female version of Merc and Polygamy Porter without resort to vulgarities.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
rcrocket wrote:Interestingly, when opposing attorneys or adverse witnesses want to personally insult me they call me "Crock" in court, to my face, in depositions or in emails -- a play on "crock of s**t". It has been that way for over 20 years, all sorts of different people and circumstances; and here, you. It is interesting having a poster with hate-filled messages serving as a moderator. I still like you, even though I think you are unqualified to be posting on any matter of substance. A sort of female version of Merc and Polygamy Porter without resort to vulgarities.
Really? I was simply playing on your name. Or sometimes on your "chewing" up a few posters ala crocodile. Maybe I should go with Rock... or Rocket...
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 10:45 pm
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
I find that quite offensive. That makes them sound like power freaks... P.s. I'm not banned, but it might take them a while to work out who I am. ALthough, I generally don't cause bother and I am a good Mormon girl, except the cup of tea I drunk today which was only because I drank everything else and I don't like tap water.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
I guess it ended up being like a suspension, although not articulated. Not really interested in posting though, I just was acting as Gramps' puppet on the issue.liz3564 wrote:Wait...Bond...you're banned again? I thought you had Juliann wrapped around your little finger with your boyish charm. No?B23 wrote:Can someone get them to let me back into the game? I swear I won't let gramps twist my arm into making smac look bad again.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
Imwashingmypirate wrote:I find that quite offensive. That makes them sound like power freaks... P.s. I'm not banned, but it might take them a while to work out who I am.
Aren't you Dr. Peterson?
Tea? Jesus H. Christ. Don't you know that when young Mormon girls swallow tea it can lead to pregnancy and HIV? It's true.ALthough, I generally don't cause bother and I am a good Mormon girl, except the cup of tea I drunk today which was only because I drank everything else and I don't like tap water.

Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
B23 wrote: Don't you know that when young Mormon girls swallow tea it can lead to pregnancy and HIV? It's true.
What about when old Mormon women swallow it?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2690
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:21 pm
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
harmony wrote:B23 wrote: Don't you know that when young Mormon girls swallow tea it can lead to pregnancy and HIV? It's true.
What about when old Mormon women swallow it?
I can't really say. I'm not a doctor.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
MASH quotes
I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it.
I avoid church religiously.
This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
B23 wrote:I can't really say. I'm not a doctor.
Maybe that explains the hot flashes!
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am
Re: MAD un-bans posters!
harmony wrote:What about when old Mormon women swallow it?B23 wrote: Don't you know that when young Mormon girls swallow tea it can lead to pregnancy and HIV? It's true.
Then it may be one of the seveneight deadly heresies (c) BMC.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei