Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

[_Quasimodo]

that's kind of funny considering many complaints from people here is that maxwell doesn't have much of a publication standard.

That's a very good point, Stem. It makes one wonder how bad Will's paper really was.

[_Darth J]

And now, it's time for today's episode of

Double Standard!!!

It can be true that no one cares about this place and his posts on this place could have been the cause for Maxwell folks to not publish his paper.

versus

that's kind of funny considering many complaints from people here is that maxwell doesn't have much of a publication standard.

ETA: For those who missed it (that would be Stemelbow in his forthcoming riposte), the double standard is it while people here think that the Maxwell Institute does not have the same standards for its publications as most academic, peer-reviewed journals, it can be true that it has some standards.

[_Buffalo]

Stem, I'm concerned about the ratio of insults to substance you've been contributing lately. Are you okay?

'course I'm okay. the insults are lobbed at DJ, you'll make note. that dude can't handle the truth--but I think he can so I lob them for his benefit. I don't universally dispense them.

Remember when you were so concerned about the tone here?

[_Darth J]

Sure he meant to suggest that some poeple here seem to take this place far to seriously

Of all the things I love about the unintentional comedy of Mormonism, the defenders of the faith being oblivious to their playing the role of the straight man might be my favorite.

[_Mattie]

When I was in junior high school, there were special ed kids who rode on the same bus with us. There was always a group of stupid, immature boys who loved to gang up and make fun of one particular Down’s syndrome kid.

That’s what the last few posts on this thread remind me of.

[_schreech]

When I was in junior high school, there were special ed kids who rode on the same bus with us. There was always a group of stupid, immature boys who loved to gang up and make fun of one particular Down’s syndrome kid.

That’s what the last few posts on this thread remind me of.

Wow...I've seen people occasionally say mean things to the stem but I have never seen anyone equate him to a "down's syndrome kid". Ouch.

[_Quasimodo]

When I was in junior high school, there were special ed kids who rode on the same bus with us. There was always a group of stupid, immature boys who loved to gang up and make fun of one particular Down’s syndrome kid.

That’s what the last few posts on this thread remind me of.

I'm not sure Stem would appreciate being compared to a Down's Syndrome child. Stem is no "special ed" kid. He holds his own pretty well.

Maybe another analogy?

[_Darth J]

When I was in junior high school, there were special ed kids who rode on the same bus with us. There was always a group of stupid, immature boys who loved to gang up and make fun of one particular Down’s syndrome kid.

That’s what the last few posts on this thread remind me of.

I'm not sure Stem would appreciate being compared to a Down's Syndrome child. Stem is no "special ed" kid. He holds his own pretty well.

Maybe another analogy?

Stem? I thought he was talking about Schryver.

[_Mattie]

When I was in junior high school, there were special ed kids who rode on the same bus with us. There was always a group of stupid, immature boys who loved to gang up and make fun of one particular Down’s syndrome kid.

That’s what the last few posts on this thread remind me of.

I'm not sure Stem would appreciate being compared to a Down's Syndrome child. Stem is no "special ed" kid. He holds his own pretty well.

Sure he does.

Observing this place has been extremely enlightening.

I've also observed things at a site called thefoyer.org. Between that place and here, it's really been an eye-opening experience.

[_Quasimodo]

Stem? I thought he was talking about Schryver.

:). Well, that would explain the refusal of Will's paper (just kidding, Stem).