Fence Sitter wrote:If I were trying to figure out where a leak was in my organization and if I could limit my suspicions to a few people, I might be tempted to send out 18 or so bogus emails that appeared the same but had small differences, so that when one showed up in public I could tell who started the leak.
Just a thought.
Is that even possible? How could he cc different emails?
I don't know how you would do it with 'cc' but here is how it might be done.
He could send them separately. (For example he could just send it to a particular person with a note saying something to the effect that he had meant to include that person in the initial email) or he could blind copy someone who would not know they were really the only person copied. If Bradford were not part of the set up, he could just mistype Bradford's email address and bc only one person correctly, then rinse repeat for the others with slightly different versions. The fact that people know he sent it to 18 others makes this a bit more problematic. If one was willing to mistype, slightly, each email address, other than the intended recipient, it could be done. There are probably more tech savy ways to do it.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
lulu wrote:No, what you do is reveal your in real life ID, & then when something comes up about you that is public knowledge but which you don't like having discussed here, you falsely say "it's personal." It's much more honorable to do it that way.
If I choose not to be anonymous, I have no choice but to reveal my identity. So your comment is nonsensical.
bcspace wrote:Any confirmation yet that these emails are real?
Funny you should ask.....I just checked a thread on RfM, and they are asking the same thing. They are wondering if this is all some huge scam, and DCP and the other MI participants are off somewhere having a good laugh at our expense.
lulu wrote:No, what you do is reveal your in real life ID, & then when something comes up about you that is public knowledge but which you don't like having discussed here, you falsely say "it's personal." It's much more honorable to do it that way.
If I choose not to be anonymous, I have no choice but to reveal my identity. So your comment is nonsensical.
No, you're a hyprocrit. You post freely about what a crack trial lawyer you are with your billionaire clients. But if someone calls you one it, you whine, oh, that's personal.
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
bcspace wrote:Any confirmation yet that these emails are real?
Funny you should ask.....I just checked a thread on RfM, and they are asking the same thing. They are wondering if this is all some huge scam, and DCP and the other MI participants are off somewhere having a good laugh at our expense.
I have to admit, it is an interesting theory.
I can certainly see how it is plausible, given the unique insights Mormons have about manufacturing documents and getting other people to fall for them.
Darth J wrote:I can certainly see how it is plausible, given the unique insights Mormons have about manufacturing documents and getting other people to fall for them.
Not plausable, the current crop of Mormon apologists doesn't gloat in secret.
"And the human knew the source of life, the woman of him, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, 'I have procreated a man with Yahweh.'" Gen. 4:1, interior quote translated by D. Bokovoy.
Funny you should ask.....I just checked a thread on RfM, and they are asking the same thing. They are wondering if this is all some huge scam, and DCP and the other MI participants are off somewhere having a good laugh at our expense.
I have to admit, it is an interesting theory
I've posited no theory other than the fact that Shady Acres is looking to benefit from speculation on the emails whether they are real or not. Not having been able to count any coup in the real world, they have to make up their own game.
I can certainly see how it is plausible, given the unique insights Mormons have about manufacturing documents and getting other people to fall for them.
Wasn't that a 150 year old document under 20 years of bat guano but on top of a 10 year old concrete pad?
I can certainly see how it is plausible, given the unique insights Mormons have about manufacturing documents and getting other people to fall for them.
Wasn't that a 150 year old document under 20 years of bat guano but on top of a 10 year old concrete pad?
Are you analogizing to the Book of Mormon or the Book of Abraham?
As local priesthood authority, is the gift of discernment assisting you in assessing the reliability of this email attributed to Daniel Peterson? Much as the gift of discernment helped the Bretheren with the Salamander Letter, or the Kinderhook Plates?
I would think that having experience on both ends of a hoax, Mormons would have a unique perspective about this current incident.
