Re: Louis Midgley Issues Another Threat to Gina Colvin: "She deserves a good trashing."
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2022 11:46 pm
Midgley is such a boorish blowhard. What he needs is a blowjob.
Internet Mormons, Chapel Mormons, Critics, Apologists, and Never-Mo's all welcome!
https://discussmormonism.com/
My recollection is that he didn’t interact with anyone; he just straight lectured. I really didn’t like the guy.Dr. Shades wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 1:42 pmWhat was he like? And how did he treat or interact with his female students?Rollo Redux wrote: ↑Fri Jul 01, 2022 6:16 amHasn’t that moron died yet? He seemed elderly when I took his class in the 80’s!
Would be great to have more of your recollections for the Midgley book coming out that Dr. Shades is writing.Redux wrote:My recollection is that he didn’t interact with anyone; he just straight lectured. I really didn’t like the guy.
no, he doesn't. You, on the other hand....Louis Midgley >
7 days ago
Philip: poor gemli does not even rise to the level of being even a bit "creepy."
Peterson appears to have removed the comments section on that blog post. Perhaps in an effort to try and deny that the Midgley ever did anything wrong.Doctor Scratch wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 10:51 pmI imagine that the Mopologetic gloating over the Supreme Court ruling will go on for quite some time. Naturally, being who they are, one can't expect them to behave with Christian civility and goodwill. Perhaps instead of their usual donations to the Interpreter Foundation, maybe they should consider donation to a charitable organization that (e.g.) offers support to battered women? Or women who are dealing with problematic pregnancies? Just kidding: we all know that's never going to happen.
In fact, just today, Louis Midgley has been "opining up a storm," if you want to call it that. Issuing dire threats towards one woman in particular--Gina Colvin--might be more accurate. In the midst of their frenzied commentary on news coverage of the post-Roe goings-on, Philip Leaning gives this report:
Midgley responds with what can only be described as frightening viciousness:Philip Leaning wrote:Re Roe vs Wade:
You should see the garbage being spouted by the NZ media that shows absolutely no understanding of what was the real motivation for the decision (i.e. constitutional) and no inclination to make any effort to understand it.
(This on top of a 3-part hatchet job "investigation" into the Church's finances in NZ published in the NZ Herald, the country's largest newspaper, which relies heavily for its dark insinuations on the testimony of nameless apostate "former bishops" too fearful of "reprisal" to reveal their identities. And of course, Gina Colvin.)
"A good trashing"? Wow. That sounds like a threat, doesn't it? And this after Midgley openly and creepily announced that we would be "paying her a visit" in New Zealand, only to meet up with her husband instead. Does he have an obsession with her or something? In any case, Philip immediately comes through with the "dirt":Louis Midgley wrote:Philip:
Please send me this rubbish. And especially anything by Gina Colvin. I am writing an essay in which I may, for very good reasons, trash her. She deserves a good trashing. You can go to my page on Interpreter and there you will find my email address. Well, at least I can find it there.
And Midgley is grateful:Philip Leaning wrote:I've emailed you the link. Enjoy...
It's interesting: in a separate blog entry posted today, Dr. Peterson asks, "Is my faith 'terrible for women'?" I think that's debatable, but there is apparently no question that Mopologetics is "terrible" for at least one woman. I guess now that the the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, it's going to open season on any female enemies of the Mopologists? I guess we'll see.Midgley wrote:Thanks! Please keep me posted on anything that turns up.
Meanwhile, I know that I speculated on whether "SeN" was at risk of being "cancelled." Well, perhaps this might come about thanks to Midgley's rancid behavior? Time will tell.
Maybe Doctor Scratch could look into this, because it seems Peterson has deleted most comments on his blog for at least 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019. That's when I stopped checking.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:15 amPeterson appears to have removed the comments section on that blog post. Perhaps in an effort to try and deny that the Midgley ever did anything wrong.
Not sure. I can’t see anything in their terms of service that covers it. However I did find this:Marcus wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:50 amMaybe Doctor Scratch could look into this, because it seems Peterson has deleted most comments on his blog for at least 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019. That's when I stopped checking.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:15 amPeterson appears to have removed the comments section on that blog post. Perhaps in an effort to try and deny that the Midgley ever did anything wrong.
I wonder why? Is this a Patheos policy?
https://www.patheos.com/terms-of-useC. You agree not to use any part of the Patheos Site to:
i. aggressively and/or repeatedly attempt to proselytize or convert others to what you believe;
ii. to ask for money for yourself, for another individual, or for any for-profit cause;
iii. promote on-line or off-line sites, products or services;
Hey, the apologists don't have a problem with that! At least he wasn't enjoying a cup of coffee. If you want to know what bad is, that's bad. Drinking a hot drink is what's bad.With that, my head was cleared of the visceral images of The Midge slapping