DCP doubles down on semantics to salvage Brigham’s racist legacy

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: DCP doubles down on semantics to salvage Brigham’s racist legacy

Post by MG 2.0 »

I Have Questions wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:44 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:24 pm


Silly man. You are doing exactly what I’ve described. You literally cannot think outside of a self imposed/constructed box of your own making. You then DEMAND that others meet you on your terms inside your restrictive and suffocating box of limited thinking and exploration.

I don’t HAVE to meet you inside your box and meet your personal demands. Come out! Smell the roses! The world is bigger and brighter…and more complex…than you can even imagine. And me, for that matter.

Regards,
MG
I didn’t think you would.
And I don't think you will.

Regards,
MG
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4269
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: DCP doubles down on semantics to salvage Brigham’s racist legacy

Post by I Have Questions »

malkie wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 1:00 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 9:12 am
I’m struggling to match MG’s idea that God allows His prophets to make wrong decisions that affect the whole church for generations, with the Church teaching that God will never allow His prophets to lead the Church astray. Either MG is talking rubbish, or the Church is. The Church and MG cannot both be correct as their statements are mutually exclusive of each other. They can of course both be wrong.

It is worth noting that the Church asserts that you can always trust the living prophet. I think the SEC discovered that no, you can’t.
Choose one of the following according to immediate apologetic needs:
  1. God allows His prophets to make wrong decisions that affect the whole church for generations
  2. God will never allow His prophets to lead the Church astray
Whichever you choose, ignore, deny, or at least downplay the other.
Mormon’s certainly lack the intellectual integrity to communicate in a honest and sincere fashion. Particularly those engaged in writing blogs and participating in message boards.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: DCP doubles down on semantics to salvage Brigham’s racist legacy

Post by Marcus »

I Have Questions wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:24 pm
Mormon’s certainly lack the intellectual integrity to communicate in a honest and sincere fashion. Particularly those engaged in writing blogs and participating in message boards.
The fibbers who designate themselves as Mental Gymnasts certainly do.
Post Reply