Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

[_Lemmie]

Good point, he really mixes up the grammar sometimes. Based on the topic at hand, he could be implying that others have done good things with religion, which were good in the sense that his church was then able to use and build upon them in order to restore the “right” version of religion. Still pretty arrogant.

[_moksha]

Moksha • 3 days ago
We know that Jesus was not Scandinavian or Western European, even though he has been portrayed as such in our approved artwork. He probably looked very Semitic, with no Vikings in the woodpile.

Louis Midgley Moksha • 2 days ago
I love it when Moksha uses the word "our" in one of his jokes.

Moksha Louis Midgley • 2 days ago • edited

I love it when Moksha uses the word "our" in one of his jokes.

Louis, the Jesus of "your" artwork is probably an angry green-scaled alien. Otherwise, Jesus would be as Semitic as his ancestors.

Louis Midgley Moksha • 2 days ago • edited
To begin to grasp at least part of the reason Moksha, who seeks to be and is widely celebrated as a jolly, fun-filled fellow, claims that the Jesus of my "artwork is probably an angry green-scaled alien," one needs to know that on 22-26 April he was among those who made the following remarks about me on Geina Colvin's Kiwi Mormon Patheos blog: "I was described as "creepy," as a "creepy stalker," of being a "disingenuous stalker," of "perverted behavior," of being a "conscience-less creep," "a disgusting, mean, and angry old man," with "a long and well-documented history of nastiness, personal attacks and stalking." With 400 documented instances, yet.

I was also accused of having "made up lie after lie that her [Gina Colvin's] husband wanted to meet me." Then accused of being "mean-spirited," and of "vile behavior," and "boorish behavior," and again of being a "creepy stalker. "Midgley is a disgusting excuse for a human being. He is a creep and perverted beyond belief." And he is guilty of "un-Christian like behavior," and he is involved in the "blood-thirsty culture of Mopologists" (whatever that is). I am "quite simply a mean spirited and tremendously unkind bigot," full of "rudeness."

I am advised to "stop trolling and slither back to [my] cesspool known as sic et non." I am also "dishonest." And "I did not complete the course work for my Phd in political science." I am "frequently dishonest, mean-spirited, racist, and highly offensive." And "Dan [Peterson] protects me and allows me to egregiously violate Patheos rules."

This may help those not fortunately not familiar with the real Moksha, and his amusing speculation about "the Jesus of [my] artwork."

DanielPeterson a day ago
Stop it, Moksha. You already have a Hate-Midgley site. This isn't it.

[_Lemmie]

Aww, Moksha, I think you’re growing on the Midge! Although why he thought everyone needed a reminder of how he stalked Colvin in order to understand your reference is beyond me. Anyone who reads him for more than a few days gets all the information necessary to understand his approach. Add in his posts on Colvin’s blog and he’s got a slam-dunk on his hands!

[_moksha]

You know, Lemmie, I would be very cordial to Professor Midgley since I like older people, if he didn't constantly try to put me down. I think he was genuinely surprised that so many posters sprung to Gina's defense when he tried pulling his shenanigans on her blog. I suppose I am the only one he can lash out at even if my contribution to that posting barrage was small and inconsequential.

[_Dr LOD]

From the midge. In medical and psychology terms it is very close to “word salad” so at least in his little mind Mosksha is equal to the individual who carried out the Christchurch massacre. Good grief Peterson put a muzzle on your little pet.

For reasons I will not go into, except to say that they were deepened by what happened after my recent glorious Sunday in Christchurch, New Zealand, where I met some people, and was able to talk our guide into taking us to one of those two Mosques where that fellow killed over fifty people and wounded even more, I find Moksha utterly disgusting.
Professor Peterson understands why I am more than a little troubled by certain utterly reprehensible people.

Further along.

Dr. Exiled looked at DNA? Really? How? Whose opinion? Like Dr. Velho Burrinho (a.k.a. Little Old Donkey) did, when he bought Simon Southerton hook line and stinker?

No midget I read Southerntons book years after I came to my own conclusions on the subject. All you know about DNA, and genetics is the stuff Perego spoon fed to you guys and the brethren so he could get a job.

[_Philo Sofee]

It's too bad Midgley can't find a way to demonstrate Sr. Southerton is a fake Dr. Then he would have all the evidence he needed against DNA..... I mean it's perfect Donald Trump logic. DNA refutes soundly the Book of Mormon peoples. A fake Dr uses DNA to show the Book of Mormon is made up. Therefore, the Book of Mormon is true actually because there is a fake Dr. using DNA to refute the Book of Mormon!

[_Lemmie]

You know, Lemmie, I would be very cordial to Professor Midgley since I like older people, if he didn't constantly try to put me down. I think he was genuinely surprised that so many posters sprung to Gina's defense when he tried pulling his shenanigans on her blog. I suppose I am the only one he can lash out at even if my contribution to that posting barrage was small and inconsequential.

I agree, I think he must have been surprised, why else would he keep posting and re-posting those comments about himself? He can’t seem to fathom that people really do think those things about him, so he keeps bringing them up because he thinks they illustrate how persecuted he is. And yes, I think he is picking on you right now, not because it is you, but because your participation currently provides a path to facilitate bringing up the topic Of his “persecution,” or whatever wrong against him he is obsessing over.

This, however, is just bizarre:

Midgley:

For reasons I will not go into, except to say that they were deepened by what happened after my recent glorious Sunday in Christchurch, New Zealand, where I met some people, and was able to talk our guide into taking us to one of those two Mosques where that fellow killed over fifty people and wounded even more, I find Moksha utterly disgusting.

Professor Peterson understands why I am more than a little troubled by certain utterly reprehensible people.

Wow. What a horrible thing to say. Moksha, I am so sorry you were the recipient of that. If it helps any, I think he would have said that about whoever was the current recipient of his obsessive bullying.

Midgley seems to have no self-awareness of his own reprehensibility, but surely Peterson knows that comment goes too far. It is his blog, and it reflects on him and his religion that he lets a BYU professor emeritus post nonsense like that on a blog ostensibly supporting the LDS position.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

It must be utterly shocking when reality slaps that little lying crap squarely on the cheek. He’s been protected for far too long from the real consequences of his idiotic behavior. He needs the little bubbles in which he can incubate his hatefulness, and when they are occasionally popped by someone who doesn’t feel the need to protect his sensibilities it’s utterly astonishing to him. I have a feeling he was indulged as a boy, and that’s the reason why he was shocked by Army personnel who probably thought he was a little weirdo, by Maori who didn’t recognize his amazing-ness, and by people outside Mormonism who snort at his oddball behavior.

- Doc

[_Gadianton]

Wow, Midgley's legendary anger is on full display! I always thought Moksha had a knack for keeping things light-hearted. I got a kick out of his comment that Midgley responded to and I think his use of the word "fatwa" was entirely correct. Kiwi57 upvoted Midgley's response and interestingly, so did Sam LeFevered. But I didn't see DCP upvote it yet. I find that interesting because Midgley specifically said DCP would understand why he feels the way he does about Moksha. I mean, couldn't DCP give Midgley a quick acknowledgement via upvote that he is correct? If he refuses to upvote, could we conclude that DCP doesn't understand Midgley's -- let's face it, in this instance, utterly psychotic -- feelings?

[_Philo Sofee]

Lemmie
but surely Peterson knows that comment goes too far. It is his blog, and it reflects on him and his religion that he lets a BYU professor emeritus post nonsense like that on a blog ostensibly supporting the LDS position.

Peterson knows a lot more about how phony everything he stands for than he will ever acknowledge. He fools no one, even himself. He's fake, Midgley is fake. It's why they bloviate or let bloviating substitute for the Gospel of Love they so hypocritically proclaim they believe in. They certainly do not live it. Through the years of watching their interactions I have grown in appreciation for some form of higher power (my own inborn intelligence?) which opened my eyes to the clear stupidity Mormonism churns out, and the insipid idiocy of its apologists. HALLELUJAH I no longer have to try to defend that in order to be "faithful." CHORTLE!
Moksha obviously is entirely misunderstood by the Maori loving idiot missionary who pretends he is their savior called Midgley and whose new name from the temple would not surprise me if it was "idiot." If it was a full name it would be Idiot S. Moron. The "S" I would put as Stupid. No one else anywhere misunderstands Moksha. The only two who are so dense they can't "get it" are the two Mormon apologists.
And for Pete sake all the ridiculous whining about everyone seeing them as evil. We don't see you as evil you morons, we see you being, acting, and talking stupid. We see stupidity, not evil. My gawd the inane lament that everyone looks at them as evil is dumb. You aren't evil, you're dumb as dirt, stupid, witless. Look the words up, they have nothing to do with being evil you dopes. We aren't persecuting you and hating you, we are laughing at you and acknowledging where the real stupid in Mormonism lies these days. We don't hate stupid, we just have no reason to respect it. Only stupid people think they are hated when others show the stupid they exude. You exude stupid, not evil. You are not persecuted, you are too stupid to know the laughter about you and the stupid way you write really biased, stupid book reviews and publish over the top actual stupid papers imagining it is scholarly to stupidly put forth 688 quick papers a month instead of just one solid, well written, argued, and excellent paper a month. Big numbers impress you. It's stupid. Notice also stupid is not spelled e-v-i-l. It's rather stupid to confuse the two.