Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

[_Lemmie]

Midgley:

The world of those who infest a certain board is dramatically unlike that of those who strive to be faithful Latter-day Saints, who strive to worship God by doing good for all people, and to the very best of their ability, telling the truth about how things really are. Those who come to sic et non to sneer and smear have other motives.”

Wow, Midgley’s projections are getting extremely specific! Whatever Midgley’s motives are when he comes to “sneer and smear,” they seem to drive him relentlessly. Sad.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

He can’t even keep his lies straight.

“I was more than a little surprised when we arrived at one of the four meeting houses in the Christchurch Stake that the Stake President immediately directed me to Dr. Nathan McCluskley, who is Gina Colvin's husband. We immediately became good friends. And on March 12, the Area President phoned me and wanted to know if the Stake President had been successful in this endeavor.”

So, the Stake President just so happened to introduce Forrest to Gina Colvin’s husband? What a miraculous coincidence!

And Forrest became best buddies with Gina’s husband? Miracle of miracles that the husband of Gina’s most relentless critic would like him so much!

And why would the Area Presidency be aware of the Stake President’s “endeavor” to sync the Keeviler Elf up with Ms. Colvin or her husband?

Somehow I think this nasty piece of work would’ve been home in Bishop Snow’s (1857 castration guy) world, fighting enemies and apostates who’d dare to exist on this earth.

- Doc

[_moksha]

After the latest posts regarding Gina, Professor Midgley had this to say on another blog article comment section:

LB Chris365 • a day ago
This too shall pass.

Moksha LB • 17 hours ago

This too shall pass

.
Sounds like a worthy motto for all Deacons.


Louis Midgley Moksha • 13 hours ago • edited
To have a look at Moksha at his very best just 16 hours ago "passing" something, please have a look at Professor Peterson's blog entry entitled "What can afford us a basis for hope" that was posted on 21 May. Scroll down to near the end. There you will find Moksha at his very best.

Moksha • a day ago
Trump has declared churches to be ‘essential,’ and called on them to reopen. Not sure if Trump is trying to cull older church members or just trying to curry favor with the Ammon Bundy faction of his supporters. The LDS Church always includes a Sacrament Meeting and passing the sacrament in a way that does not spread the virus will be problematic. You can't physically take the sacrament wearing a mask, and the act of passing it between ward members would become a means of transmission.

Louis Midgley Moksha • 14 hours ago
To see Moksha at his very best "passing" something, please have a look at Professor Peterson's blog entry entitled "What can afford us a basis for hope" that was posted on 21 May. Scroll down to near the end. You will find Moksha at his very best.

[_moksha]

“ I was stunned to just now read Moksha defending his own recent disgusting behavior on Gina Colvin's blog. And I am delighted that Professor Peterson responded.

And OF COURSE Mr. Peterson endorses this bizarre obsessive behavior. BYU professors. Mormon priesthood holders. Stalkers.

- Doc

Those interested may read Dr. Peterson's response here:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_thread

I hope Dr. Midgley does not keep taunting me because I have been told to back off responding to him about the Gina Colvin Incident.


Louis Midgley Moksha • 3 hours ago • edited
So now Moksha is "content to let this matter drop and never bring it up again," if and presumably only if I do not "keep using [him] as an artillery target on this issue."

I was not responsible for the truly nasty insults and utter falsehoods Moksha and his associates from Dr. Shades hate board directed at me on the "Kiwi Mormon" blog. And Moksha could not resist bringing that same rubbish to Professor Peterson's blog.

[_Lemmie]

Midgley:

I never announced that I intended to "stalk" Gina Colvin. If the world "stalking" has any real meaning, it describes something that is a crime. I don't stalk people. However, Moksha is a serious pest on sic et non.

I was more than a little surprised when we arrived at one of the four meeting houses in the Christchurch Stake that the Stake President immediately directed me to Dr. Nathan McCluskley, who is Gina Colvin's husband. We immediately became good friends. And on March 12, the Area President phoned me and wanted to know if the Stake President had been successful in this endeavor.

http://disq.us/p/29g26dl

And now he’s got the LDS Area and Stake President in on it. Right. I really doubt they are involved, due to Midgley’s propensity to exaggerate to the point of lying every time he retells a story.

And he seems to think that because HE doesn’t define his stalking as “ a serious crime,” he isn’t really stalking. Too bad for him it doesn’t work that way.

Moksha Louis Midgley • a day ago

Louis, I think those people started opposing your initial stalking of Gina when you first announced it on her blog. They tried warning her that you would be up to no good before you ever set foot in that ward with her husband. Her husband apparently did not remember the warning she gave him. Anyone interested is welcome to check out the Kiwi Mormon blog on Patheos (this site) and read it for themselves. Start with the entry back in December.

http://disq.us/p/29fvj68

...specifically seek out Gina Colvin, at her home Ward, and to let her know who he was and talk to her about... something? THAT is stalking. Worse, yet. He found her HUSBAND and glad-handed him in perhaps one of the most bizarre moments of this “soldier for Jesus”’s history. Think about it. He travelled halfway across the world with the thought in his peabrain that it’d not only be a good idea to do this, but then to damned publish that he’d done it.

That sums it up pretty well.

[_Philo Sofee]

Moksha quoting Midgley
I was not responsible for the truly nasty insults and utter falsehoods Moksha and his associates from Dr. Shades hate board directed at me on the "Kiwi Mormon" blog. And Moksha could not resist bringing that same rubbish to Professor Peterson's blog.

This is evidence of another thing Mormonism does for its followers. Midgley and his entire attitude and the way he talks down to others who don't come to conclusions he believes all people ought to come to concerning God, religion, sex, and education, etc., is ENTIRELY responsible for the insults he receives. He is so daft as to not realize how incredibly crude, rude, and stupid his approach and arguments are. Mormonism has taken away his ability to objectively see his own views, or at least far less subjective than he does see them. It's not rubbish to be critiqued. If he can't handle it, then he ought to actually demonstrate he has a little wisdom and shut up already. :rolleyes:

[_moksha]

Just think of all the effort Midgley had to go through to get to Gina's ward meeting. Arrangments through the Church, arrangements through the tour groups, etc... Dr. Peterson was content to allege that Midgley was on an ocean cruise with no destination that just happened to pull into port and just happened to show up at the particular ward he said he wanted to visit a couple of months prior. Just a coincidence, like one day he was in Orem and he just happened to go to the Salt Lake International Airport and somehow mistakenly ended up on a flight to Los Angeles. Does anyone remember the cartoon series, Mr. Magoo? I supposed Magoo could suffice as an apologetic style argument against a purposefully arranged trip. "Confound it I should be in Provo right now, not... where did you say I am?"

[_Gadianton]

I never announced that I intended to "stalk" Gina Colvin. If the world "stalking" has any real meaning, it describes something that is a crime. I don't stalk people. However, Moksha is a serious pest on sic et non.

Timothy McVeigh didn't announce that he was going to murder 168 people, but that he might perhaps reform the system with bloodshed. The two are very different things. The Holy Spirit didn't announce to Nephi that he should murder Laban, but that he should slay him. Most people, when they commit what society considers to be crimes, do no believe that their actions are, in fact, wrong. This is especially true when religious zealots act in the name of God.

Does the word "stalking" have any meaning? The apologists play this game all that time and say certain words are meaningless, therefore no discussion is possible. Unfortunately for them, very few words have been used as repeatedly as "stalking" by top tier apologists. If Dr. Scratch is "stalking" DCP because he comments on information DCP publishes very publicly and has positioned himself as a very public figure, then Mr. Midgley's announced plans and actions carried out in regards to Dr. Colvin arguably constitute "stalking". Imagine if Dr. Scratch were to announce and carry out an in real life matter analogous to what Mr. Migdley has done in relation to Dr. Clovin. Would the apologists call it "stalking?" At the very least. Most likely, they'd be calling the FBI.

[_Doctor Scratch]

I never announced that I intended to "stalk" Gina Colvin. If the world "stalking" has any real meaning, it describes something that is a crime. I don't stalk people. However, Moksha is a serious pest on sic et non.

Timothy McVeigh didn't announce that he was going to murder 168 people, but that he might perhaps reform the system with bloodshed. The two are very different things. The Holy Spirit didn't announce to Nephi that he should murder Laban, but that he should slay him. Most people, when they commit what society considers to be crimes, do no believe that their actions are, in fact, wrong. This is especially true when religious zealots act in the name of God.

Does the word "stalking" have any meaning? The apologists play this game all that time and say certain words are meaningless, therefore no discussion is possible. Unfortunately for them, very few words have been used as repeatedly as "stalking" by top tier apologists. If Dr. Scratch is "stalking" DCP because he comments on information DCP publishes very publicly and has positioned himself as a very public figure, then Mr. Midgley's announced plans and actions carried out in regards to Dr. Colvin arguably constitute "stalking". Imagine if Dr. Scratch were to announce and carry out an in real life matter analogous to what Mr. Migdley has done in relation to Dr. Clovin. Would the apologists call it "stalking?" At the very least. Most likely, they'd be calling the FBI.

Remember when Everybody Wang Chung said, as a joke, that his wife had bought them tickets to join Dr. Peterson on a cruise? And how DCP reacted to that? And what he did? And how he's still rattled by it?

[_Dr LOD]

The baby complains that he was called out for stalking.

notice that eleven hours after my having pointed out that Moksha was the one who brought that nasty stuff he and others posted about me to Professor Peterson's blog. He did this by calling attention to the fact that those on Dr. Shades hate board, presumably fearing for Gina Colvin's safety, had in December already warned her on her that I was headed to Christchurch, New Zealand, to "stalk" her, whatever that means.
On 21-26 April, on Gina Colvin's "Kiwi Mormon" blog, I was described by Moksha and others from Dr. Shades board as "creepy," as a "creepy stalker," of being a "disingenuous stalker," of "perverted behavior," of being a "conscience-less creep," "a disgusting, mean, and angry old man," with "a long and well-documented history of nastiness, personal attacks and stalking." With 400 documented instances, yet.
I was also accused of having "made up lie after lie that her [Gina Colvin's] husband wanted to met me." Then accused of being "mean-spirited," and of "vile behavior," and "boorish behavior," and again of being a "creepy stalker. "Midgley is a disgusting excuse for a human being. He is a creep and perverted beyond belief." And he is guilty of "un-Christian like behavior," and he is involved in the "blood-thirsty culture of Mopologists" (whatever that is). I am "quite simply a mean spirited and tremendously unkind bigot," full of "rudeness."
I am advised to "stop trolling and slither back to [my] cesspool known as sic et non." I am also "dishonest." And "I did not complete the course work for my Phd in political science." I am "frequently dishonest, mean-spirited, racist, and highly offensive."
I will immediately cease pointing to these stupid, nasty, demonic attacks on me by Moksha and his buddies, if and only if he will apologize for having been part of this, and also promise never again to engage on sic et non or on the Dr. Shades board.

So he wants an apology because others pointed out the truth of his abnormal behavior, and his warped idea of how a “so called saint” conducts themselves. Sorry old man you had plenty of years to grow up.