wenglund wrote: The problem with your question is that it fails to take into account a large portion of the life-equation. It looks alone at things in terms of outcome, and in a mono-dimensional way, without considering the processes often needed to produce those outcome.
You can degrade the comment by calling it whatever you want, but trying to make it more complex than it is through bogus analogies and trumped up layering doesn't make it so.
If you know with perfect certainly what the outcomes will be, there's no point to the process, especially when the Mormons are always referring to our experience as a "test." What's there to test? Tests are conducted when the outcomes are not known.
wenglund wrote: It's somewhat like asking a physical trainer: "If you know, with perfect certainty, that through your program, and according to individual choice and action, which of your clients will become healthy, fit, and strong, and which will get fatter, or which will end up somewhere inbetween, then why would you even bother putting any of them through your program? What's the point of the check-up at the end of the program? Why not now just give those obese clients you know would become healthy and fit, a clean bill of health, and be done with it?
Wouldn't that be "damn silly"?
Here's the problem with your analogy, Wade: physical trainers aren't omniscient. God apparently is.
The other problem is that to a physical trainer, it doesn't matter so much whether he knows someone will get fit or not. He has the motivation to do his thing to get paid; that's his job.
Or are you saying God's employed?
Got another analogy?
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.