An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Simon Belmont

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Buffalo wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:I guess, according to Themis, I am an insider of the Revolutionary War (I'm American, after all!)


Derp



Well am I or not?

Grant Palmer wasn't there in the 1820s/30s to be an insider to Mormon Origins.

I wasn't there in the 1770s to be an insider to the Revolutionary war.

Yet, Themis believes that we can both claim insider status to these events, right?
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Buffalo »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Well am I or not?

Grant Palmer wasn't there in the 1820s/30s to be an insider to Mormon Origins.

I wasn't there in the 1770s to be an insider to the Revolutionary war.

Yet, Themis believes that we can both claim insider status to these events, right?


Your reading comprehension sucks.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

I'm curious as to why Palmer's work within the CES disqualifies him as a Church "insider."
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Simon Belmont

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Simon Belmont »

Doctor Scratch wrote:I'm curious as to why Palmer's work within the CES disqualifies him as a Church "insider."


It doesn't.

He is a church insider.

He is not an insider of Mormon origins.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Doctor Scratch wrote:I'm curious as to why Palmer's work within the CES disqualifies him as a Church "insider."

It doesn't.

His lack of publications, credentials, special sources, unique connections, and etc. relevant to the historical study of Mormonism means that he fails to qualify as somebody with "insider" status on Mormon historical issues.
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Doctor Scratch wrote:I'm curious as to why Palmer's work within the CES disqualifies him as a Church "insider."

It doesn't.

His lack of publications, credentials,


In what sense are these things relevant to his "insider" status (or lack thereof)?

special sources, unique connections, and etc.


So you're saying that he wouldn't have had any of these during his time with the CES?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_madeleine
_Emeritus
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 6:03 am

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _madeleine »

Wait a minute, that is not the definition of "insider".

in·sid·er (n-sdr)
n.
1. An accepted member of a group.
2. One who has special knowledge or access to confidential information.

insider [ˌɪnˈsaɪdə]
n
1. a member of a specified group
2. a person with access to exclusive information
Being a Christian is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea, but the encounter with an event, a person, which gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction -Pope Benedict XVI
_jon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1464
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:15 am

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _jon »

madeleine wrote:Wait a minute, that is not the definition of "insider".

in·sid·er (n-sdr)
n.
1. An accepted member of a group.
2. One who has special knowledge or access to confidential information.

insider [ˌɪnˈsaɪdə]
n
1. a member of a specified group
2. a person with access to exclusive information



Simon?
Simon?
Has anyone seen Simon...?
'Church pictures are not always accurate' (The Nehor May 4th 2011)

Morality is doing what is right, regardless of what you are told.
Religion is doing what you are told, regardless of what is right.
_Pahoran
_Emeritus
Posts: 1296
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:20 am

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _Pahoran »

Daniel Peterson wrote:With PP's arrival, the conversation, poor as it already was, is now irredeemable.

Quite right.

The greatest weakness of this place is not the Mormon-mocking "humour" of its three "kingdoms" or the levels awarded the participants. Nor is it the fact that sanctimonious school-marms are given carte blanche to put the boot into Mormon (of course) participants. It's not even the justifiable sense of inferiority that keeps it obsessing about MD&D.

It is that people with absolutely nothing to say, like Porta-Potty-mouth, can barge into a thread and essentially condemn it to Telestial oblivion simply by their own copious discharges of utter vacuity.

And with that, I am done here. Goodbye, everyone.

To all the intelligent people on MDB: don't forget to do your home and visiting teaching this month.

To everyone else: try to get a life.

Regards,
Pahoran
_mikwut
_Emeritus
Posts: 1605
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:20 am

Re: An Insiders View Of Mormon Origins...

Post by _mikwut »

Hello Dr. Scratch,

special sources, unique connections, and etc. (Dr. Petersen)

So you're saying that he wouldn't have had any of these during his time with the CES? (Scratch)


My father worked for CES for over three decades from seminary teacher, to institute director, to asst. and area directorships. I can categorically state that this did not give him anymore access to historical documents or sources than I myself or any other member, unless an institute library across the hall of his office full of church materials and books counts. He obtained during his career a large library himself but these would be titles such as FARMS publications, Journal of Discourses, etc.. I don't think that is what Mr. Palmer relied on. Any connections that would be utilized if my father wanted to write and publish a historical book relying on historical resources like Palmer's wouldn't have been gained while he worked with CES. He taught at BYU for a time and I would say that would have been his only access to an "insider status" properly defined by Dr. Petersen but even that I don't think reaches any level of "insider" insinuated by Palmer's book. Otherwise, my father's status would be no different than mine or yours as members of the church. He just had the ability to read correlated materials and books as part of his job teaching at a greater pace than members that have non-church jobs.

If my father wrote Palmer's book, and I have my knowledge of a CES man from growing up as child and knowing him, I would certainly feel misled by the exaggerated claim like Palmer's. I think a criticism and proper contextualization of the "insider" insinuations is perfectly proper and appropriate.

my regards, mikwut
All communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
-Michael Polanyi

"Why are you afraid, have you still no faith?" Mark 4:40
Post Reply