Mister Scratch wrote:Pahoran wrote:Mister Scratch wrote:Fourth time, kiddo: Are you the author of "The Anti-Mormon Attackers"?
Your silence is leading me to believe that you are.... If I don't hear anything back from you by the end of the day, that will answer the question for me, and I will take it as a tacit admission on your part that you are indeed [Deleted].
You may conclude anything you like. Read my lips: I will not discuss my in real life identity with you.
Regards,
Pahoran
Very well, then you are indeed [Deleted], author of "The Anti-Mormon Attackers." Since you have admitted to this right here on Mormondiscussion.com,
That last is as truthful a statement as any you have ever made in any Internet forum: it is blatantly, flagrantly false. I have "admitted" no such thing.
Reporter: "Mister Scratch, is it true that you have twenty million bucks in the bank?"
Scratch: "I will not discuss my bank balance with you."
Reporter: "So you admit it!"
The transparency of that sophistry should be obvious even to you.
then I see little reason why you would have any problem with me restoring this bit of information to the blog.
Your obsessive hate blog is yours to do with as you please.
I'll give you a bit of time to protest and/or respond, but be forewarned that I expect a legit reason. You simply "not wanting" it there isn't going to cut it, especially in light of the way you've been behaving.
You mean--almost, but not quite, as badly as you?
Very well, I shall give you five (5) reasons.
1) Because you purport to be outraged, offended, shocked and scandalised by Professor Hamblin naming an Internet message board participant, and you might not want to be a complete and utter hypocrite.
2) Because you want people to believe that I have misjudged you, and that you are an all-around stand-up guy and a man of your word. And on Sun Nov 05, 2006 at 12:21 pm, in the "Mister Scratch, a word with you please" thread, you wrote:
As for Pahoran, I will happily remove his real name if he wants me to.
I want you to.
So are you a man of your word, or not?
Do you actually have integrity, or is your given word only to be relied upon as long as the person you gave it to is in your good graces?
3) As I said before, I choose to post pseudonymously for a reason. When in the past I posted under my own name, I was subjected to a rather nasty bout of cyber-harassment. If such a thing were to happen again, I might not be able to trace the party who actually did it, but I will regard your obsessive hate blog as the source.
4) Your obsessive hate blog contains a number of libellous falsehoods. The legal adivice I have received tells me that I can't do anything about that as long as you are referring to me only by my pseudonym. That would change if you were to put anything that would actually enable anyone to identify me in real life.
5) _____ might not want his in real life information to be put up on this forum.
I'm not going to suck up to you or try to negotiate with you. Your obsessive hate blog is yours; your decision is yours, and will reflect upon nothing but your own character.
Regards,
Pahoran