Does Wade Englund Use a Sock Puppet?

[_Mister Scratch]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

[_Dr. Shades]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

Just my $0.02, but I don't think it was Wade. Think of what Wade habitually posts under his own name. Were the "Juliann" posts any worse?

Also, the "Juliann" posts were so, so true to character and form, I have a hard time believing it wasn't her. Wade, to my knowledge, isn't in the habit of imitating anyone, per se, just wildly caricaturizing them.

[_Kevin Graham]

The Juliann_Reynolds posts were too short to be from wade. This guy writes a novel and develops an entire science project based on one comment, but Juliann typically offers quips.

There weren't any misspellings either.

I suppose it is possible it wasn't Juliann. If I knew for a fact it wasn't her, I would remove all the posts.

[_wenglund]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

Were I to care (I don't. I am fine with you believing whatever), I doubt it would matter to you if I confirmed or denied it. You will go with whatever your conspiratorial mind imagines.

However, both Kevin and Liz have access to the IP addresses and may be of some assistance if the three of you wish to look into it.

Or, since it seems to be of such importance to you, maybe you can call the Department of Homeland Security.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Kevin Graham]

wade if you email Juliann and confirm that it is not her, then I will remove the posts. I will ban that IP also. I am sure she doesn't want posts online in her name. I know I wouldn't.

[_Mister Scratch]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

Were I to care (I don't. I am fine with you believing whatever), I doubt it would matter to you if I confirmed or denied it. You will go with whatever your conspiratorial mind imagines.

However, both Kevin and Liz have access to the IP addresses and may be of some assistance if the three of you wish to look into it.

Or, since it seems to be of such importance to you, maybe you can call the Department of Homeland Security.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

So is that a "yes" or a "no"? Come on, Wade---grow a spine and give us a real answer.

[_Gazelam]

[_wenglund]

wade if you email Juliann and confirm that it is not her, then I will remove the posts. I will ban that IP also. I am sure she doesn't want posts online in her name. I know I wouldn't.

Your mind-reading and projecting aside, if I thought she cared, I would pursue the issue, or she would. But, I have reason to believe that she doesn't care any more about it than I do--which amounts to nothing. So feel free to work it to your conspiratorial advantage as you have already done. You and other MTT's apparently need to believe she is participating on your site, and being supposedly "frustrated" by your hypocritical mod shenanigans, more than she needs to correct that she's not.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_wenglund]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

Were I to care (I don't. I am fine with you believing whatever), I doubt it would matter to you if I confirmed or denied it. You will go with whatever your conspiratorial mind imagines.

However, both Kevin and Liz have access to the IP addresses and may be of some assistance if the three of you wish to look into it.

Or, since it seems to be of such importance to you, maybe you can call the Department of Homeland Security.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

So is that a "yes" or a "no"? Come on, Wade---grow a spine and give us a real answer.

Since you have suggested on multiple occasions that you can't take me seriously, I am surprised you would ask. To me, your asking was a meaningless jesture.

Anyway, I prefer to enable your conspiratorial mind instead. It is far more entertaining to me.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

[_Mister Scratch]

In another thread, Wade claimed that he knew, "on good authority," that the recent appearance of "Juliann_Reynolds" on MTT was the result of a sock puppet. I hereby assert that the sock puppet was none other than Wade Englund himself. He has long said, after all, that his aim is to "hold up a mirror" to those critics he most dislikes, and seeing as how many of the critics at MTT have taken aim at juliann, it seems fitting that Wade would use her as a "mirror." Further, some of the wording and intent underscoring the postings seem curiously "Wade-esque."

Wade can confirm or deny this if he'd like.

Were I to care (I don't. I am fine with you believing whatever), I doubt it would matter to you if I confirmed or denied it. You will go with whatever your conspiratorial mind imagines.

However, both Kevin and Liz have access to the IP addresses and may be of some assistance if the three of you wish to look into it.

Or, since it seems to be of such importance to you, maybe you can call the Department of Homeland Security.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

So is that a "yes" or a "no"? Come on, Wade---grow a spine and give us a real answer.

Since you have suggested on multiple occasions that you can't take me seriously, I am surprised you would ask. To me, your asking was a meaningless jesture.

Anyway, I prefer to enable your conspiratorial mind instead. It is far more entertaining to me.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Yet another non-answer. C'mon, Wade---a simple "yes" or "no" will do.