DiscussMormonism.com

juliann wrote:I think what they are mad about is that I didn't remember Beastie's history. I meant to recite a creedal narrative of her every move for the past 5 years every morning but I just keep forgetting to. I can't believe that they think they are so important that I would remember squat about their activity a day later. All I know is that she isn't' [sic] banned (I checked) ....but for some rreeealllly strange reason it is bad form for me to respond here when I haven't posted anywhere else in recent memory. Anti logic, gotta love it.

What a wonderful lil' post that was! Notice the vitriol apparent in the third line (especially that word, "squat"), which you can practically hear being accompanied by juliann's spit. The fact is that juliann clearly does remember Beastie's history, and, apparently, is very, very angry about it.

Her last bit of reasoning makes no sense at all. The reason is is "bad form" for her to respond on the fittingly named MADboard is several fold:

---She has far more "cheerleaders" on MAD than Beastie does either here, on KG's board, or on ZLMB
---The moderating team at MAD (which likely includes juliann herself) is notoriously biased and unfair
---Beastie cannot access MAD (that this isn't a fact of her being banned is a side issue)
---She is the one distorting the scholarship
---All of her "cheerleaders" on MAD could easily accompany her to ZLMB, here, or wherever, but Beastie fans such as myself are genuinely banned from MAD
---Etc., etc., etc.

It ought to be plain to everyone that juliann is just plain intimidated by Beastie.

juliann wrote:She can come here any old time if debating me rather than trashing me (safely surrounded by her cheerleaders on other boards) was her aim.

I don't think that "trashing" was anyone's aim. Rather, the aim was to hold juliann accountable for her gross distortion of research.

juliann wrote:In other words, if what I think is so darn important to you, come and talk to me instead of whining about my nerve in responding to the insults you are spreading over the internet, Beastie. I'm going to start the apostate topic again so you can hide on your other boards whimpering or you can take it head on.

Well then, juliann, perhaps you and Dan_G can delete her account, or refresh it, or in some way enable her to fire the thing back up?

juliann wrote: And guess what....I can't think of a reason in the world as to why I would need to bring up the name you hide behind.

Let's take a poll! How many people think that Beastie can go a day without bringing up my name on one of her many message boards? Obsession does not even begin to describe her behavior.

Nor does rancorous imbecility begin to describe juliann's.

Juliann's ire is aimed at Beastie/Trixie because even Juliann knows a superior intellect when she sees it. Trix has tied Juliann in knots again and again. No wonder Juliann's spitting nails again. Once more Juliann has nothing but dregs to quench her thirst for victory. And no wonder the church has washed their hands of FAIR. Juliann's an embarrassment every time she posts.

Juliann will do and say anything other than to address the topic. Ben's addressed it all, so no need, according to Juliann. However, Ben's postmodernism leads him to speculate that the restoration of the "true" priesthood and the divinity of JC aren't foundational claims of the LDS church, and could feasibly be discarded one day. Funny how not one word out of her mouth has addressed that.

We need pictures of Julianne frothing at the mouth,,,now that would be funny,,and piss her off

Maybe I'm missing something, but now that Juliann has swept the MA&D boards clean of anyone willing to challenge her, why does she have to bring up Beastie at all? Why doesn't she just sit back and enjoy the hermetically sealed little cyber-empire she's carved out for herself?

Dr. Shades wrote:Maybe I'm missing something, but now that Juliann has swept the MA&D boards clean of anyone willing to challenge her, why does she have to bring up Beastie at all? Why doesn't she just sit back and enjoy the hermetically sealed little cyber-empire she's carved out for herself?

Because a hermetically sealed little cyber empire isn't any fun?

Shades,

Juliann can't resist responding to criticism - of course, she's not really responding to any of the content of the criticism, but simply attacking me as an ignoramus. This is what she cannot resist.

It seems to me that often the most vociferous folk who tend to use personal attacks against their critics are also the thinnest skinned as well, and take great umbrage to being questioned or criticized.

I asked what seems to me to be a very reasonable question - I wanted Juliann to defend and explain her assertion that postmodernism is somehow salvic to LDS apologetics in that it is the "greatest threat" to "anti-mormonism". I wanted to explore the road of postmodernism, in regards to LDS truth claims. While Ben has been willing to do those things - defend his views, explore the end of the road, Juliann, instead, has simply attacked me.

beastie wrote:While Ben has been willing to do those things - defend his views, explore the end of the road, Juliann, instead, has simply attacked me.

Big surprise, eh? :-)

The head moderator there Chaos (Dan G.?) had this to state earier this evening:

If anyone needs to recover a forgotten password I would like to remind them they can recover their password using our Lost Password Recovery Form. This tool has always been available on our site.

Chaos

I am wandering what you happened if I tried to do that and try to log back on it. Will they try to ban my I.P. Address again? It is too bad for them that I can still easily view their lame Message Board very easily.

Brackite wrote:I am wandering what you happened if I tried to do that and try to log back on it. Will they try to ban my I.P. Address again? It is too bad for them that I can still easily view their lame Message Board very easily.

I think that was a personal invitation (read: challenge) to beastie.