Recovering From MAD

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Analytics
_Emeritus
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:24 pm

Recovering From MAD

Post by _Analytics »

I’ve always gotten along pretty swimmingly on LDS oriented message boards, but the mods at MAD have censured me three times this week. I’m not complaining—it’s their prerogative to run the board as they see fit. But I don’t think I’m going to post there anymore.

But for the record, here are the three strikes.

Strike 1
Smac started a pretty bizarre thread about how Western Civilization was literally in danger of extinction because secularism doesn’t encourage high birth rates. He said that
[Latter-day Saints] believe in things that propagate civilization and the human race. Much of secularism is taken up with concepts that lead to the extinction of our society: abortion-on-demand, advocacy of homosexuality, hostility to religion, nanny-statism and its attendant costs, sexual profligacy, and so on.


I honestly didn’t understand his point. It seemed to me that he was either making an extremely flawed argument or was saying something that went way over my head. His messages were full of comments like, “The pro-gay, pro-abortion crowd necessarily dwindles for lack of propagation, hence the need for secularists to proseletyze amongst folks like me and my children.” I found this language to be scorn.

If I may dare say it, it is bigoted to label somebody who is pro-choice as being “pro-abortion”, and it was also ironic to hear a Mormon sound offended that somebody from a different background would be so arrogant as to proselytizing to him and his children.

I found his comments to be full of disdain for secularism, and I thought he was putting all sorts of ugly thoughts into others. But I wanted him to clarify his position before I judged him too hard. I asked him,
Here is a serious question: What’s your point? Are you saying that if everybody saw the light and became secularists that the human race would literally become a species in danger of extinction? Or are you saying that since various backwards cultures over-breed that secularism will go extinct unless they continually get converts from the irresponsible breeders? Or are you saying that if we want our culture (i.e. our non-Catholic, non-Islam, white western culture) to survive, we need to outbreed the Catholics, Muslims, and welfare moms?


Smac got highly offended at the way in which I asked him to clarify his position, and decided to have a chat with the mods. There response to me was hilariously ironic, given Smac's posts on the thread.
Do not put imply ugly thoughts to other posters. We aren't going to put up with disdain anymore so make a choice. ~ Mods.


Strike 2
So I decide to let Smac’s rant sink on its own lack of merit, and I back out. But I thought it would be worthwhile to subtly illustrate how incredibly inaccurate it is to label pro-choice as “pro-abortion”. So I started this thread:

I believe that somebody should have the legal right to be a Mormon. Now, I don’t think the Mormon Church is true and I actually think that becoming a Mormon is a sub-optimal decision in most circumstances. But I don’t believe that the government should be in the business of dictating which religions somebody may belong to.

Therefore, I’m pro-Mormon, right?


I knew that less than half of the people there would get the point, but was surprised that Momus almost immediately shut it down with a terse “No personal threads.”

Strike 3
But I thought my point was worthwhile, so I started the thread again, slightly reworded so that the slower mods wouldn’t be confused as to the point. I made some headway with somebody who originally claimed that “pro-abortion” was a correct term, but then conceded,
You are right that the pro-abortion label is likely unfair to place on all proponents of abortion. Many do believe that the right to an abortion should be protected, even if the person would never choose one for themselves or loved one--I supect there are some LDS who take this stand and would never consider themselves pro-abortion. I'm certain Mitt Romney was one who thought like this(when he ran as pro-choice).

Labeling the other side "pro-abortion" is a political tactic. But so is labeling your opponents "war-mongers". Both sides don't care about being honest or accurate--they care about winning and making extreme statements about their opponents is a normal tactic.

I decided to quibble with the last point, because the word “warmongering” is a superlatively accurate description of President Bush’s actions before the Iraq invasion. In contrast, “pro-abortion” isn’t at all accurate.

The topic of the thread was accurately labeling people, and all I’d done is juxtaposed the word “warmonger” with the word “pro-abortion”, and compared and contrasted whether the words were heated and whether the words were accurate. I was right in the middle of the strike zone of the thread’s topic. But again the moderator was too dense to understand my point, and responded,
You just turned this into a political thread. Thread closed.
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

OMG! This is too funny, Analytics!

Welcome to the board! :)

I always enjoyed your posts on FAIR/MAD. You will definitely be appreciated here.

Great to have you here!

:)

Liz

Edited to add---Hopefully you'll find less mental gymnastics with the Mods here! LOL
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Analytics---

Their loss is our gain. Really, there is no reason you should have to tolerate their brand of tendentious and unfair crap. I for one would like to extend a warm welcome to you. Here's to many more of your posts!
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Recovering From MAD

Post by _harmony »

Welcome aboard, Analytics. I was wondering how long it would be before you joined us. Your threads are welcome here, so go ahead and start some. We haven't had a good heated abortion debate in quite a while, and although we don't have smac here, we do have Gaz and Loran to carry the ball for that side.

As for recovering from MAD, that is in the mind of the beholder. It's very good of Shades to provide this place for us, where we can discuss the same topics, with an unheard of freedom for LDS boards. But then, this is just an LDS board, neither blatantly pro nor blatantly con.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Analytics - I had seen so little of you lately that I imagined that you had "recovered" from any desire to post on these boards whatsoever. That's my eternal yet elusive goal, and I always envy those whom I imagine finally achieve that state (like notice how addicto has totally disappeared??). So now I no longer have to envy you. Welcome!! ;)

Yes, the blowback from the loosening of censorship at MAD has been extremely entertaining. It's like a special little soap opera. As the Worm Turns....
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Analytics
_Emeritus
Posts: 4231
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:24 pm

Post by _Analytics »

Thanks for the warm welcome!

As I read your comments, beastie, I had this mental image of stumbling drunk into a cheap bar on skid row, seeing my old friends, and watching them jovially toast me with half-empty beer glasses for having fallen off the wagon.

It’s great to be here, thanks!
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Analytics wrote:Thanks for the warm welcome!

As I read your comments, beastie, I had this mental image of stumbling drunk into a cheap bar on skid row, seeing my old friends, and watching them jovially toast me with half-empty beer glasses for having fallen off the wagon.

It’s great to be here, thanks!


A TOAST!! TO ANALYTICS!!!! HERE'S TO FALLING OFF THE WAGON!! ALL HAIL!!! WELCOME TO THE BOARD!!!

Image
Last edited by QuestionEverything on Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Recovering From MAD

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Do not put imply ugly thoughts to other posters. We aren't going to put up with disdain anymore so make a choice. ~ Mods.


No personal threads.


You just turned this into a political thread. Thread closed.


Wow. Talk about missing the point!

But I thought my point was worthwhile, so I started the thread again, slightly reworded so that the slower mods wouldn’t be confused as to the point. . . But again the moderator was too dense to understand my point, . . .


That's another major problem with MA&D. They seem to choose the slowest, densest participants to be their moderators, so even after you dumb something down to sub-Teletubby level, they still misunderstand. You can't win.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Re: Recovering From MAD

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Dr. Shades wrote:
That's another major problem with MA&D. They seem to choose the slowest, densest participants to be their moderators, so even after you dumb something down to sub-Teletubby level, they still misunderstand. You can't win.


Honestly Shades. You're insulting the Teletubbies by comparing them to the MAD mods.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

As I read your comments, beastie, I had this mental image of stumbling drunk into a cheap bar on skid row, seeing my old friends, and watching them jovially toast me with half-empty beer glasses for having fallen off the wagon.


LOL! How apt. Now if only we could tempt some of our other former drunkards with a fine wine....
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Post Reply