Hoops wrote:Is pomposity self blinded as well?
That's just Wade, being Wade.
But the overtones of what you say are still there. People often do not want to appear discouraged or depressed. But still there is a more openess at least where I attend.
beastie wrote:But the overtones of what you say are still there. People often do not want to appear discouraged or depressed. But still there is a more openess at least where I attend.
I'm glad the attitude is changing.
So why the aversion to appearing discouraged, depressed, or doubting? I do believe the aversion to expressing these things is part of the LDS culture.
History seems to demonstrate that, although it sometimes is slow to embrace change, the LDS church usually does eventually follow cultural trends. The understanding of depression and mental illness in general and accept that it is not a sign of weakness (or sin) is something our culture is now trending to. So perhaps in another twenty years the LDS church will finally fully accept that as well.
And hooray for that woman who spoke out.
beastie wrote:Maybe this is a change that will occur in the LDS church from the bottom-up, so to speak. As more members become more educated on the nature of mental illness in general, and depression in specific, and realize that it is not caused by some character flaw, the more will speak up and the culture will change.
When I was LDS, there was a general suspicion towards the professional mental health community. This pressure was towards seeking help from one's bishop, and if that didn't work, getting a referral to the LDS counselor who visited on a schedule. But from my experience, that LDS counselor was not qualified to deal with serious emotional/mental issues. Do you think that the attitude towards "outsider" mental health intervention has softened over the past ten years?