moksha wrote:
What I continually have a problem with is for some members to equate their political conservatism with proper thought for Mormons.
Indeed, I think you are right. I remember two Mormon ladies arguing about politics and one telling the other she could not be a Labor voter (equivalent of the Dems)
and a good Mormon. That didn't then, nor does it now, strike me as making much sense. I was a Labor voter for some 18 years, then I switched to conservative, but I am in fact a "swinging voter", and if I like a Labor politician's ideas enough, and he's criticised by the Left in his own party enough, I'll vote for him/her. Policies influence me more than ideology, and I have libertarian views on some social policies. I'm not anti-abortion, for example. I am perhaps an economic conservative, but a social libertarian, in some things. I believe in compassion for the underprivileged, but I have no time for willful bludgers who feed off taxpayers hard-earned dollars, or for that matter, rich people who liberally use government subsidies.
moksha wrote:I still am not thoroughly sold on the idea that conservatism is compatible with the Christianity of Jesus, but I never the less am at peace knowing that if that is what puts the zip in some Mormons step then so be it. However, I like them to extend this same consideration to those who are either liberal or democratic.
The Jesus of the gospels comes across, to me, as both conservative and liberal. Definitely morally conservative, but in some of the parables he comes across almost as a communist. Although it's only a parable with a religious message, the idea of one who works 12 hours getting the same "pay" as one who works one hour can seem socially unjust. Or the Prodigal son receiving preferential treatment to the ever faithful son. Then he says be as wise as the "children of Mammon" in your dealings. Most of his teachings have dual messages, or what Barbara Thiering called "layers of symbolic interpretation".