Turns out - rcrocket is a bishop -

Post by **_Anon.a.Mouse4** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:37 pm

--OR-- there is another Bishop Crockett in the ****** Second Ward

on a whim, Google and I went for a stroll down binary lane.. my primary reason - to argue the benefits of remaining anonymous. 30 minutes later, I was stunned with the details I found... I think the data speaks for its self or rather -- it's self YOU PRICK !

[IMAGE LINK DELETED]

I will share here a small piece of the data published on the internet for everyone, anywhere to see. A little scary is it not???? of course, I left out his mindless blatherings about the MMM on FARMS..

[MODERATOR NOTE: Personal information about rcrocket deleted]

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:40 pm

Oh! Do we really need to know somebody's information?

I geddit, being anon is important so people don't track you down... but this is a bit much!

Post by **_moksha** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:44 pm

Too bad Bob did not choose an anonymous name. by the way, is it ethical to post this?

Post by **_dartagnan** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:44 pm

Who cares?

_Nephi · Post by **_Nephi** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:46 pm

Yeah, I question the motives of anyone who would want to do something like this to a stranger.

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:46 pm

moksha wrote: by the way, is it ethical to post this?

I would think not!

Shades! I'm not comfortable with the idea that there are no rules against posting personal information on the posters here!

VERY uncomfortable!

Post by **_beastie** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:47 pm

The information that a determined individual can obtain about others on the internet is frightening. Bob's pet peeve about anonymous posting is one of the sillier diversions I've seen yet on the net, but one that has become popular among several MADdite types. Whenever I read the "anonymous" whine, I just think to myself... one more demonstration that the poster is not able or willing to address whatever issue is being discussed, and is instead trying to divert attention to the poster, away from the content of the post. Yawn.

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:59 pm

I would appreciate it if you deleted the material about my children.

Post by **_harmony** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:03 pm

rcrocket wrote:I would appreciate it if you deleted the material about my children.

Okay, that whole post makes me very uncomfortable. I never doubted he was a bishop, and personally, I'm delighted that he is employed, but I do NOT need to know how much his house is worth, or how much his property taxes were (boy, I'm glad mine aren't that high!).

Delete it all.

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:06 pm

I didn't EVEN read it! Saw what it was and didn't even look to see the details!

This is disturbing to me.

NOT appropriate. What does this prove? We ALL know we can google people and their information. Hopefully crocket now realizes why so many of us choose to not put our names with our posts!