New Here --Suspended from MAD for Arguing with DCP- Question
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:20 am
Hey all. Some of you may know me from MAD -- I have not been there long, but managed to sir things up occasionally. I am now on my third suspension. I am just wondering, do the MAD moderators admit to their obvious double standards. I mean, don't get me wrong, it is their prerogative, but I am wondering if they actually admit it or try to act as if they believe they are evenhanded.
For example, Selek said this to me on the day I was suspended:
"You'll have all eternity in hell to ponder the number of innocent windmills you accosted."
(Note that this is strange considering I have not "accosted" anyone and am simply an active member struggling with newly learned history. In fact, if you read the couple of posts that led to Selek's "final judgment" against me, you will be left wondering what his excitement was about. You can check it out on page 5 of the "Priesthood Manual 2008 Joseph Smith" thread at MAD, which is now 19 pages and still on the first page.
Selek was admonished by the mods, but not suspended even though it was his second offense that morning.
Later in the thread, I made a rather well deserved, I thought, sarcastic remark toward DCP related to an argument we were having on a Bishop's authority to speak to his ward members for "the Church" on local matters -- see page 12 of the same thread.
I was immediately suspended for two weeks. Obviously, Selek's comment about my eternal damnation was a far more personal and offensive sneer, so it seems the mods simply admit that they are not evenhanded. Which is fine. I just thought they might want to give the appearance of evenhandedness. (By the way, I have been suspended three times since joining the board a few months ago for comments entirely innocuous compared to those lodged against me.)
As I sidenote, I forgave Selek and invited him to make restitution through an apology, but he chose not to. Ah well. He seems to maintain his position that I am an "anti" posing as a struggling member, which is simply not the case, and I think my 300 posts at MAD make that quite clear. Regardless, it is a way for him to dismiss me and my arguments.
For example, Selek said this to me on the day I was suspended:
"You'll have all eternity in hell to ponder the number of innocent windmills you accosted."
(Note that this is strange considering I have not "accosted" anyone and am simply an active member struggling with newly learned history. In fact, if you read the couple of posts that led to Selek's "final judgment" against me, you will be left wondering what his excitement was about. You can check it out on page 5 of the "Priesthood Manual 2008 Joseph Smith" thread at MAD, which is now 19 pages and still on the first page.
Selek was admonished by the mods, but not suspended even though it was his second offense that morning.
Later in the thread, I made a rather well deserved, I thought, sarcastic remark toward DCP related to an argument we were having on a Bishop's authority to speak to his ward members for "the Church" on local matters -- see page 12 of the same thread.
I was immediately suspended for two weeks. Obviously, Selek's comment about my eternal damnation was a far more personal and offensive sneer, so it seems the mods simply admit that they are not evenhanded. Which is fine. I just thought they might want to give the appearance of evenhandedness. (By the way, I have been suspended three times since joining the board a few months ago for comments entirely innocuous compared to those lodged against me.)
As I sidenote, I forgave Selek and invited him to make restitution through an apology, but he chose not to. Ah well. He seems to maintain his position that I am an "anti" posing as a struggling member, which is simply not the case, and I think my 300 posts at MAD make that quite clear. Regardless, it is a way for him to dismiss me and my arguments.