DiscussMormonism.com

http://www.meetmormonmissionaries.org/anti-mormons.html

Another one? is this "more good" or someone else?

check out this line, they just can't hide their anger, can they?

The important thing to remember when reading anti-Mormon and ex-Mormon hate literature directed at the Mormon Church is that they only tell their side of the story. They play up every failing of a Church leader or find obscure quotes that do not pertain to the Gospel to discredit Mormons. Prophets are not perfect and when they comment on things like science or history they do so according to their own knowledge just as everyone does.

as if it wouldn't be important to remember that when meeting the missionaris, they only tell their side of the story; and between the two, that antis and missionaries, it's almost guaranteed that it's that anti-Mormons only who know both sides.

As Hinckley dots the land with temples no one attends, A. W. dots the internet with organizations of none.

it's also funny to me that all these apologetic websites violate the church's request to be called the "Church of..." and always refer to "Mormons" and "Mormonism".

Gadianton wrote:

The important thing to remember when reading anti-Mormon and ex-Mormon hate literature directed at the Mormon Church is that they only tell their side of the story. They play up every failing of a Church leader or find obscure quotes that do not pertain to the Gospel to discredit Mormons. Prophets are not perfect and when they comment on things like science or history they do so according to their own knowledge just as everyone does.

More Internet spam. Hate literature?!

cksalmon wrote:
More Internet spam. Hate literature?!

I find calling people names and slandering their characters hateful.

Or do you only find it "hateful" if it is applied to groups you sympathize with?

charity wrote:

cksalmon wrote:
More Internet spam. Hate literature?!

Or do you only find it "hateful" if it is applied to groups you sympathize with?

No, I just have a very low tolerance for groups and individuals (and message boards) who punt to "hate speech" when confronted with opinions and evidence that mightily conflict with their a priori beliefs.

"Anti-mormon hate speech." Blech.

Atheists who disagree vehemently with my Christianity, and who say so, just aren't engaging in hate speech. The charge is wantonly ridiculous.

It's a ridiculously-self-serving charge to make and posture to take. And the site is Internet spam.

Hey, Joseph Smith lied repeatedly about his and his church's involvement in polygamy. HATE SPEECH!

And, Charity, I'd also like to say, "Welcome to the board." I'm one of the one's who likes you, ma'am.

cksalmon wrote:

charity wrote:

cksalmon wrote:
More Internet spam. Hate literature?!

Or do you only find it "hateful" if it is applied to groups you sympathize with?

No, I just have a very low tolerance for groups and individuals (and message boards) who punt to "hate speech" when confronted with opinions and evidence that mightily conflict with their a priori beliefs.

"Anti-mormon hate speech." Blech.

Atheists who disagree vehemently with my Christianity, and who say so, just aren't engaging in hate speech. The charge is wantonly ridiculous.

It's a ridiculously-self-serving charge to make and posture to take. And the site is Internet spam.

Hey, Joseph Smith lied repeatedly about his and his church's involvement in polygamy. HATE SPEECH!

And, Charity, I'd also like to say, "Welcome to the board." I'm one of the one's who likes you, ma'am.

Thanks, cks.

I agree with you that not everything unpleasant is hate speech. I can say, "I like vanilla ice cream" and someone can say they don't like vanilla. NIce discussion. It is only when someone says, "vanilla ice cream contains guar gum and the manufacturers are lying to you and hiding this from you and so the only people who like vanilla ice cream after I have showed them this fact are blind, deluded, brainwashed Mormons." Now that gets to be hate speech.

charity wrote:I agree with you that not everything unpleasant is hate speech. I can say, "I like vanilla ice cream" and someone can say they don't like vanilla. NIce discussion. It is only when someone says, "vanilla ice cream contains guar gum and the manufacturers are lying to you and hiding this from you and so the only people who like vanilla ice cream after I have showed them this fact are blind, deluded, brainwashed Mormons." Now that gets to be hate speech.

Even if they're right?

This is yet another one of Allen Wyatt's "More Good Foundation" websites. This is pure spam.

I'd like to kick Wyatt in the balls, he's such a f*ker.

Domain ID:D119367932-LROR
Domain Name:MEETMORMONMISSIONARIES.ORG
Created On:27-Mar-2006 17:47:10 UTC
Last Updated On:26-Feb-2007 09:21:34 UTC
Expiration Date:27-Mar-2008 17:47:10 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:986B2D32503AF7FA
Registrant Name:Whois Agent
Registrant Organization:Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.
Registrant Street1:PMB 368, 14150 NE 20th St - F1
Registrant Street2:C/O meetmormonmissionaries.org
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Bellevue
Registrant State/Province:Washington
Registrant Postal Code:98007
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.4252740657
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:Whois Privacy and Spam Prevention by DomainTools.com

Infymus wrote:Registrant City:Bellevue
Registrant State/Province:Washington

Bellevue? Allen Wyatt is in Washington? I thought he was in AZ.