Page 1 of 2

The Book of Mormon - What's in it for Ray?

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:31 pm
by _Gadianton
I want to spin this topic off. I want to know what it is Ray finds so appealing about the Book of Mormon that he'd defend it until the day he dies.

He's freely admitted that the book is not historical. This is significant. I'm not aware of any apologist who believes the book is not historical or that the book could be true at all in that case. But, perhaps the "narratives", theological teachings, or wisdom sayings are so compelling that it can be considered a great "truth" on those grounds.

However, it's also been demonstrated reasonably well I think, that Ray's liberal philosophy on at least one important topic is at significant odds with the teachings of the Book of Mormon. Or maybe I can better put it this way, there is no way Ray's liberal and tensioned views on the sex industry in general (views I find reasonable, by the way) cold possibly have been inspired or shaped by a careful reading and study of the Book of Mormon.

Further, Ray has admitted he doesn't believe all the parts of the Book of Mormon are even inspired, if I understood him right, and that he disagrees with the Book of Mormon in many respects.

So what I would like to know from Ray, is what parts in particular, or what aspects of the book as a whole he thinks are inspired and worth defending until the day he dies.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 6:34 pm
by _beastie
Can I tell what I think is worth defending, and which believers often ignore? I always liked the Book of Mormon's defense of the down-trodden and poor. In fact, at times it smacks of.... redistribution of income!! (gasp - communist!) I also liked the way it constantly reminds us that those who have power tend to abuse it.

My parents are believers, and often fuss about how ignored these teachings are by the vastly republican members around them. ;)

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 6:59 pm
by _Sethbag
Since Ray has admitted that he's not an active TBM, his views on the sex industry and other things don't count "against him" in a conversation about what he values about the Book of Mormon. He's not living the life, but he's defending the belief. That's his choice.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:00 pm
by _Inconceivable
beastie wrote:Can I tell what I think is worth defending, and which believers often ignore? I always liked the Book of Mormon's defense of the down-trodden and poor. In fact, at times it smacks of.... redistribution of income!! (gasp - communist!) I also liked the way it constantly reminds us that those who have power tend to abuse it.

My parents are believers, and often fuss about how ignored these teachings are by the vastly republican members around them. ;)


Jacob 2:17-20 - "think of your brethren like unto yourselves and be familiar with all and free with your substance..". He was encouraging individual (not governmental) responsibility toward all creatures. I have always (and still) emphasize this to my kids. Although in Mesa, the Mormons old and young are clickish and reject the outsider.

I find the chapters on faith, hope and charity (Ether 12, Moroni 7) quite compelling. Because most members (and much of the leadership) have never read that far to ponder it for themselves, they have no idea that it ought to be the only purpose for a Christ centered organization. It covers pretty much everything.

I think Benjamin's teachings that we are less than the dust of the earth, that God lends us breath and we will always be unprofitable servants no matter what we do.. well, Fathers ought not to hold this crap over their childrens' heads. It was a stupid thing to either record or make up.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:09 pm
by _Gadianton
Beastie,

I both agree and disagree with what you say. Certainly, Ray wouldn't be the only one who loves the Book of Mormon yet holds contrary beliefs to it. But the case of believers is different, since they do think it's historical and their love for it is part of a bigger commitment to the church. They think it's what establishes the Church, whether it does or doesn't or even teaches any LDS theology at all as some question. For them it's the gold that backs up their theological currency, whether or not they'll ever visit Fort Knox.

So what I'm saying is that Ray seems constrained to love it for content only. So that's why I'm asking. For all I know, he loves it just to make anti-Mormons mad.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:18 pm
by _Sethbag
Actually I don't think Ray is infatuated by the content of the Book of Mormon at all. I think he's playing a sort of Pascal's Wager game where he's not living the LDS lifestyle, but he's betting that in the End, if the Mormons are right, his playing the role of Defender of the Faith will count for something. At least, that's my read on it.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:02 pm
by _beastie
Actually I don't think Ray is infatuated by the content of the Book of Mormon at all. I think he's playing a sort of Pascal's Wager game where he's not living the LDS lifestyle, but he's betting that in the End, if the Mormons are right, his playing the role of Defender of the Faith will count for something. At least, that's my read on it.


No, I think you're wrong. Even when Ray was the most rabid anti-mormon ever (ahem, this is code for threatening to kill missionaries) he always insisted the Book of Mormon was sacred scripture. He's been consistent on that.

Re: The Book of Mormon - What's in it for Ray?

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:35 pm
by _Ray A
Gadianton wrote:Further, Ray has admitted he doesn't believe all the parts of the Book of Mormon are even inspired, if I understood him right, and that he disagrees with the Book of Mormon in many respects.

So what I would like to know from Ray, is what parts in particular, or what aspects of the book as a whole he thinks are inspired and worth defending until the day he dies.


To me that's like asking "which parts of your wife do you like best?" It's an experience, a strong spiritual experience, similar to what beastie described earlier in another thread. The difference between us is that I believe my experience was a spiritual manifestation from God. I have not experienced this since, not even close. And that is what I choose to not deny, and also to defend. I do not object to others thinking this experience has some other material basis (the brain). I do believe that those who have not had this experience can be accountable for many things they may say, or do, against the Church or the Book of Mormon (any more than I would Paul or Alma in their unconverted state). The problem is that it's not always possible to determine who has, or has not had this experience. I am not God, and I can't read minds, and the scriptures even say it's not always possible for humans to determine things like this.

So here it is in a nutshell, Gad. I cannot deny what I experienced. Any more than Joseph could deny what he experienced, or Paul, or Alma, or St. Francis of Assissi.

As for actual content, I'll have to discuss that later, but some have already given positive views, which in part reflect mine. It's Christmas day in my part of the world, and I have lots of presents to wrap still. I'll be spending the day with my children and grandchildren, and thinking about this and replying will be the last thing I want to do today.

Here is my Christmas message to all (which connects with my current sig.line), which I emailed to some friends and relatives, and I'm sharing it with some reluctance (it is not entirely irrelevant to my overall spiritual beliefs):



The Unknown Soldier: A Christmas Message From Ray.


In my work as a cab driver I come across a wide variety of people, the beautiful, the ugly, the intelligent, and sometimes the almost insane. We drivers see just about everything it's possible for humans to imagine, the best and the worst of humanity. When we think we've seen it all, something else confronts that belief.

On Friday and Saturday nights we are always flat out, and there's always a shortage of cabs. In the early morning hours people will sometimes come to blows over a cab at a rank. Last Saturday was fairly typical, but it wasn't quite the early morning rush hour yet, though jobs were coming through the on-board computer quite fast. We don't like "time-wasters" on busy Saturday nights, which usually constitutes slow moving people. This could be the excessively drunk, or elderly people (with walkers) who take ages to get into the cab. It's not a nice mentality to have, but we are in the business of earning money, as much as we can, as quickly as we can, because we know we only have a few hours in which we can discriminate in who we pick up, and if we can avoid it, we don't pick up "time wasters". Nothing irritates a driver more than to see a wobbling drunk trying to approach a cab, or an elderly person shuffling towards the cab, and in many instances the latter usually only go short distances because they can't walk it. Another irritation is having to spend time filling out M40 dockets (government subsidised half-fare concessions), which most elderly people have. It's paperwork, and it takes up valuable time on a busy night.

I accepted a computer-generated job last Saturday to a club which can sometimes produce good fares. When I got there I saw an elderly gentleman shuffling towards the cab, with a walking stick, and I thought, "oh no, here we go, what have I done; short fare, M40, and he's probably going to crap in his pants". The first words he uttered was an apology for being so slow, to which I replied "it's okay" (not). When he was in the cab he said, "never get old". This brought me some light relief. Destination: Bulli. A decent $25 fare. Great start! I changed my tune. Even if it's an M40 it would be worth filling out the docket. We immediately struck up conversation, and I learned that the old bloke was a digger who fought in Borneo during the Second World War. I'm quite a war history fanatic, so I knew this was going to be an interesting journey. The old digger told me of some of his experiences, and I thought this is gold, some people would pay to hear this, and here I am being paid to hear it!

He told me about one of his mates, Jeff, who was killed in action in Borneo, aged 20. His platoon was ordered to advance 500 yards towards the Japs, and he jokingly said being a coward he counted every yard, but his mate Jeff wanted to go farther. He told Jeff don't be silly, you're not going to get an award for bravery, but Jeff took off on his own. His body was later found, riddled with Jap bullets. Here was the old digger, now 84, recounting this event of 64 years earlier. By my calculation, this would have been about 1943, yet he was relating this to me as if it happened last week. I felt completely honoured to be listening to this, which a war historian would pay for. Because I was so riveted, I let him do all the talking, which brought the remark "I'm probably boring you with all this", which had to be the understatement of the century. 'No, no, no, I'm listening, please go on!" I was now thankful this was going to be a 15-20 minute trip, and wishing it could be longer. Every now and then he would pause and light-heartedly say, "never get old", obviously hampered by age, and possibly war injuries. He fought through the whole war, five years, including the Borneo stint. "How does it feel to be in battle?", I asked him. "You don't think about it, you don't think it's possible to be killed when you're young and invincible, you just get in and do what has to be done."

At age 60 he had a heart attack and temporarily "died". Probably brought on by smoking, a habit he said most of the diggers developed during the war. The first thing he told me before relating this experience was "Kerry Packer was wrong". Packer is famous for his remark, after also being temporarily dead after a heart attack, that "there isn't a F***ing thing there". No life after death. The digger said his experience was very different, and I relate his words as much as I can remember them: "I felt complete peace. It was wonderful, like floating, and I saw beautiful flowers in a place I can't even begin to describe." "Did you see God?", I asked. "Oh no, no, but I know this life is not all there is, and I'm not afraid of dying." I thought about his long gone mate, Jeff, who left this earth 64 years earlier, and how he must now be enjoying that place, while the old digger could only reminisce, and say, "never get old".

At the end of the journey, to my surprise, he didn't have an M40 docket, and paid full cash. He apparently had a few drinks at the club, and said he had, for the first time in a long time, "one too many", but he gave the impression he had only one, and that was enough to tip him over. He accidentally gave me $35, so I said "that's too much", and gave him back ten. "You're too honest", he said, "tell you what, take the ten and give me back five". He gave me a $5 tip. Wow, I thought, this guy not only pulls his own weight, but he's got a heart of gold. But then, he's a soldier. I told him not to move, and hopped out of the cab, opened his door, and helped him out, handing him his walking stick after. We bid goodbye, and as I drove away I thought I didn't even ask his name! Who was he? I don't know, and that's why I've called him "The Unknown Soldier".

Merry Christmas, and be thankful for life, because no matter how tough it gets, someone has done it much tougher than you have.


They shall not grow old as we who are left grow old.
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning,
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM.


Ray.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:39 pm
by _Jason Bourne
beastie wrote:Can I tell what I think is worth defending, and which believers often ignore? I always liked the Book of Mormon's defense of the down-trodden and poor. In fact, at times it smacks of.... redistribution of income!! (gasp - communist!) I also liked the way it constantly reminds us that those who have power tend to abuse it.

My parents are believers, and often fuss about how ignored these teachings are by the vastly republican members around them. ;)


That King Benjamin was such a socialist. I often use Mosiah 4 when members complained about the bishop being to liberal with welfare assistance.

Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:43 pm
by _Dr. Shades
Thanks for that, Ray. As a World War II buff myself, that's pure gold.