Page 1 of 1
Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:01 pm
by _Mercury
I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:19 pm
by _Scottie
Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
You lookin for some soft core porn to help ya through some lonely nights?
I'd go with the brunette chick. She's way hotter!!
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:20 pm
by _harmony
Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
Ask the Tanners what happens when a single entity goes up against a billion dollar business in a copywrite dispute.
How deep are your pockets?
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:30 pm
by _Mercury
harmony wrote:Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
Ask the Tanners what happens when a single entity goes up against a billion dollar business in a copywrite dispute.
How deep are your pockets?
so who owns the rights to the film and where is this made evident to the patron?
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:45 pm
by _Jersey Girl
Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
I think you could legally record the temple movie, but you couldn't distribute it. The best you could do, is as others have done, is to film re-enactments of the ceremonies and distribute those. I don't think the church has a legal leg to stand on regarding the ceremony content. I'm not an attorney though and could easily be wrong.
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:04 pm
by _Scottie
Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
I'm not sure that EULA is the right term here. Isn't that pretty much just for software?
Re: Copyright question
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:10 pm
by _Mercury
Scottie wrote:Mercury wrote:I was never shown a EULA before or after the temple film. Does this mean there is no legal reason I couldn't record the temple movie?
I'm not sure that EULA is the right term here. Isn't that pretty much just for software?
copyright, EULA...yah.