What is Apologetic Explanation for Variance of Versions
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:52 pm
Abinaldi's Fire posted this on another thread:
What is the Apologetic explanation for variances of eyewitness and earlier reports from the official version of events?
What are the Melchizedek Priesthood timeline problems he also mentioned?
...
Please pardon the interjection, but there are a few historical points relevant to the discussion of authority that some might be interested in.
In Grant Palmer's book, An Insider's View of Mormon Origins, there is a chapter on Priesthood Restoration. There are two journal entries referenced, one by Lucy Mack Smith and another by David Whitmer.
Neither entry mentions an "angel" or three Apostles as present at the baptism of Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdrey.
Excerpt from Chapter 7, entitled Priesthood Restoration:
Quote:
Like the early narratives about how the Book of Mormon came to be, the early accounts of priesthood restoration are more nuanced and fascinating than the simple, unified story that is told today. The earliest reference to priesthood authority appeared in the 1833 Book of Commandments, the earliest version of, and precursor to, the Doctrine and Covenants. According to a revelation received in June 1829, Oliver Cowdery was "baptized [one month earlier on 15 May] by the hand of my servant Joseph Smith], according to that which I have commanded him." Lucy Smith, the prophet's mother, explained the circumstances and medium by which she understood that this command from God had come to her son:
One morning however they sat down to their usual work [Joseph and Oliver were translating in Third Nephi in the Book of Mormon] when the first thing that presented itself to Joseph was a commandment from God that he and Oliver should repair to the water & each of them be baptized[. T]hey immediately went down to the susquehanae river and obeyed the mandate given them through the Urim and Thummin[. As they were on their return to the house they overheard Samuel [Smith] in a secluded spot engaged in secret prayer [.] They had now received authority to baptize ... and they [then] spoke to Samuel who went withe them straightway to the water and was baptized.
At this early date the view was that the commandment received through the Urim and Thummim is what gave Joseph and Oliver the authority to baptize.
In 1885 David Whitmer, another New York church member and one of the three special witnesses to the Book of Mormon, told a similar version of how Joseph and Oliver received their authority:
Quote:
I moved Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery to my father's house in Fayette, Seneca County New York, from Harmony, Penn. in the year [June] 1829 [so they could finish translating the Book of Mormon]. On our way I conversed freely with them upon this great work they were bringing about, and Oliver stated to me in Joseph presence that they had baptized each other seeking by that to fulfill the command ... I never heard that an Angel had ordained Joseph and Oliver to the Aaronic priesthood until the year 1834[, 183]5[,] or [183]6--in Ohio. My information from Joseph and Oliver upon this matter being as I have stated, and that they were commanded so to do by revealment through Joseph. I do not believe that John the Baptist ever ordained Joseph and Oliver as stated and believed by some. I regard that as an error, a misconception.
There are timeline problems associated with the restoration of the Melchizedek Priesthood as well.
What is the Apologetic explanation for variances of eyewitness and earlier reports from the official version of events?
What are the Melchizedek Priesthood timeline problems he also mentioned?
...