DiscussMormonism.com

For giggles, Lidia and I sat down and watch the three stooges give their acceptance speeches.

What
a
JOKE!

http://www.LDS.org/ldsnewsroom/media/me ... v&type=FLV

Monson is a dipwad! He READS the entire thing from a paper like some idiot teen doing a two minute talk in sacrament meeting, looking down most of the time!

Monson did not tap dance around the tough questions. He just avoided them!

Did you see how they treated Peggy Stack from the SL Trib? Their dislike of her was very evident. She makes a joke about the height of the mike by playfully saying "This is for tall people!". The dipwad press secretary snaps at her with "Try to STAY with ONE QUESTION PLEASE"

Peggy then asks if it is OK to disagree with positions that the leaders take with issues like the marriage amendment.. and Monson say as long as it does not involve APOSTASY?? Then completely skirts the question with a bland answer of something about being ok to have their own feelings about politics... HEY DIPWAD Monson, let me spell it out for you, the MARRIAGE AMENDMENT IS P O L I T C A L.

FURTHER, back around 2000, the Mormon church was very involved in such political issues out here in CAlifornia by telling the members to go door to door to express not their own opinion about things like marriage amendments and gay marriage, but the opinion of the church and position against those things and hand out flyers and ask if they would put up a sign in their yards! Back then I flat out refused to do this.

Peggy then tried to ask specifics about the marriage amendment and was SHUT DOWN by Monson with "goo goo good to see you again!" Gawd was a pussy!


Jenny Brendean with KUER, asked if Monson will keep an open book in terms of the media access... He answers with, "uhh umm duhh umm yes I ahh um come from media field in newspapering.. and um uh other um uh types of media.."

Horse poop! His so called "newspapering" was working for the newspaper OWNED by the damn church.


Then Jerry a Vant(spelling?) with the totally unbiased LDS CHURCH NEWS was a total PLANT with her obvious planted question of "You have had a MAJOR role churches humanitarian efforts...", then she continues with her overt plant of "pleeeaaase comment to WHHHY you are drawn to SERVING all those poor saps.. blah blah blah..."

Surprisingly Kerry Moore with the Mormon owned DesNews asked a loaded question, or she too was a plant by asking about if Uberdork was called to the first presidency as a move to show an attempt to have more representation of the outside non US membership.

Kerry missed her target by not asking WHY there are no mexican apostles. Why pick Uberdork? Especially since he represents a very small and quickly dwindling European membership.

I will tell you why. Monson and his ilk know which side of the bread to butter. The WHITE side.

While they love to brag about the membership outside of the US, the grim reality is the activity rate out there is DISMAL. Why have representation of a mostly inactive group of people?

Is it just me or is Monson just out of it?

His pauses and jumping around seems like he is high on something.

The second video: http://www.LDS.org/ldsnewsroom/media/me ... v&type=FLV

was odd.

At the end they have a panning image of him from 20 years ago. I guess the spin docs do not want the current image of a spaced-out feeble old man with crooked dentures being used.