I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy

Post by _Runtu »

I remember pleading with God to help me understand Joseph's rather messy practice of polygamy, or at least for Him to reassure me that whatever happened was OK, whether or not I understood it. Never happened. I never got past that horrible feeling inside that said it was wrong and that I ought not to defend it. The farthest I got was just simply choosing to ignore it because it did not pertain to my salvation.

I shelved it for a good ten years, but the shelf collapsed. I can't imagine myself saying what other have said: Sure, I would have given my teenaged daughter to Joseph; It must have been right because a prophet wouldn't do something wrong; you are just a neo-Victorian prude.

There's very little as valuable as a clear conscience.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_RebelYell
_Emeritus
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 10:54 pm

Post by _RebelYell »

When I was investigating the church and asked about polygamy I was told that when the saints were traveling west and men died, another man and his family took in the widow and her children. It was not until years after I joined the church that I fully understood Joseph Smith and his position on polygamy.

I don't know how families dealt with this situation - I suppose when you think you're doing it (giving up your daughter/wife/sister) that you are doing it for the benefit of the whole.

I believe that members in general do not fully understand church history and that polygamy played a pronounced role in the early years of the church.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy

Post by _The Nehor »

Runtu wrote:I remember pleading with God to help me understand Joseph's rather messy practice of polygamy, or at least for Him to reassure me that whatever happened was OK, whether or not I understood it. Never happened. I never got past that horrible feeling inside that said it was wrong and that I ought not to defend it. The farthest I got was just simply choosing to ignore it because it did not pertain to my salvation.

I shelved it for a good ten years, but the shelf collapsed. I can't imagine myself saying what other have said: Sure, I would have given my teenaged daughter to Joseph; It must have been right because a prophet wouldn't do something wrong; you are just a neo-Victorian prude.

There's very little as valuable as a clear conscience.


You're a neo-Victorian prude.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy

Post by _Runtu »

The Nehor wrote:
You're a neo-Victorian prude.


That was Will Schryver's line. LOL
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Trinity
_Emeritus
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:36 pm

Post by _Trinity »

moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.


Sig worthy!
"I think one of the great mysteries of the gospel is that anyone still believes it." Sethbag, MADB, Feb 22 2008
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.


Well, that's upsetting. There goes one of my favorite means of getting revelation.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Post by _ludwigm »

If the polygamy were valid in the OnlyTrue, I were a member.
(This fits in the "go back" thread, too)
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

No worries for Nehor being forced to practice polygamy.

With the amount of time(especially the evenings) he spends on this and the M&AD House, he will be luck to even have a slight chance at practicing monogamy!
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.
The practice was suspended on earth only, not abandoned.
Post Reply