I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 16721
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am
I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy
I remember pleading with God to help me understand Joseph's rather messy practice of polygamy, or at least for Him to reassure me that whatever happened was OK, whether or not I understood it. Never happened. I never got past that horrible feeling inside that said it was wrong and that I ought not to defend it. The farthest I got was just simply choosing to ignore it because it did not pertain to my salvation.
I shelved it for a good ten years, but the shelf collapsed. I can't imagine myself saying what other have said: Sure, I would have given my teenaged daughter to Joseph; It must have been right because a prophet wouldn't do something wrong; you are just a neo-Victorian prude.
There's very little as valuable as a clear conscience.
I shelved it for a good ten years, but the shelf collapsed. I can't imagine myself saying what other have said: Sure, I would have given my teenaged daughter to Joseph; It must have been right because a prophet wouldn't do something wrong; you are just a neo-Victorian prude.
There's very little as valuable as a clear conscience.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 10:54 pm
When I was investigating the church and asked about polygamy I was told that when the saints were traveling west and men died, another man and his family took in the widow and her children. It was not until years after I joined the church that I fully understood Joseph Smith and his position on polygamy.
I don't know how families dealt with this situation - I suppose when you think you're doing it (giving up your daughter/wife/sister) that you are doing it for the benefit of the whole.
I believe that members in general do not fully understand church history and that polygamy played a pronounced role in the early years of the church.
I don't know how families dealt with this situation - I suppose when you think you're doing it (giving up your daughter/wife/sister) that you are doing it for the benefit of the whole.
I believe that members in general do not fully understand church history and that polygamy played a pronounced role in the early years of the church.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy
Runtu wrote:I remember pleading with God to help me understand Joseph's rather messy practice of polygamy, or at least for Him to reassure me that whatever happened was OK, whether or not I understood it. Never happened. I never got past that horrible feeling inside that said it was wrong and that I ought not to defend it. The farthest I got was just simply choosing to ignore it because it did not pertain to my salvation.
I shelved it for a good ten years, but the shelf collapsed. I can't imagine myself saying what other have said: Sure, I would have given my teenaged daughter to Joseph; It must have been right because a prophet wouldn't do something wrong; you are just a neo-Victorian prude.
There's very little as valuable as a clear conscience.
You're a neo-Victorian prude.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 16721
- Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am
Re: I'm glad I never had a testimony of polygamy
The Nehor wrote:
You're a neo-Victorian prude.
That was Will Schryver's line. LOL
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:36 pm
moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.
Sig worthy!
"I think one of the great mysteries of the gospel is that anyone still believes it." Sethbag, MADB, Feb 22 2008
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.
Well, that's upsetting. There goes one of my favorite means of getting revelation.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 10158
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am
If the polygamy were valid in the OnlyTrue, I were a member.
(This fits in the "go back" thread, too)
(This fits in the "go back" thread, too)
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am
The practice was suspended on earth only, not abandoned.moksha wrote:Since the Church has abandoned the practice of polygamy, I see no reason why members need to support the concept of polygamy. As men, we know that many thoughts come to us from our own flaming swords, yet we need not hold them as theology.