DiscussMormonism.com

I'm going to start a new thread in the Celestial Kingdom. I'm not sure of the concept yet, but it will be up shortly. Now, let's see it this thread, whatever the subject, can remain civil, intellectually critical, and philosophically rigorous. Let's see how long it lasts. Let's see what the participation level is. I'll choose an interesting subject that can be hashed out at length. This will be a test case for the good ol' CK. Worthwhile discussion is the name of the game.

Here I go..

I'm on my way..

Don't try to stop me...

Here I go...I'm going now...

To the Celestial Kingdom...

See you there.

whatever the subject, can remain civil, intellectually critical, and philosophically rigorous. Let's see how long it lasts.

So you're going to create a thread and then not participate in it? LOL!

Gadianton wrote:

whatever the subject, can remain civil, intellectually critical, and philosophically rigorous. Let's see how long it lasts.

So you're going to create a thread and then not participate in it? LOL!

Exactly a characteristic behavior of Coggins!

Or the participation will be limited to ad hominem.

JAK

Neither of you have ever, to the best of my knowledge, ever submitted anything of any actual philosophical substance here in any case, so consider yourselves both disinvited.

This is especially true of JAK, who's still suckling from the CNN ninny even in adulthood, when he should have grown up intellectually and moved out of the baby pool. And you expect to be given intellectual respect, taking CNN, Larry King, and Bill Maher seriously?

Oh the pain...

Coggins7 wrote:
Here I go..

I'm on my way..

Don't try to stop me...

Here I go...I'm going now...

I can see even a team of wild horses couldn't stop you...

Coggins, you don't believe any of us here have the mental capacity to make coherent, intellectual posts in the first place...

Why would you think we could do it any better in the CK?

Coggins7 wrote:Neither of you have ever, to the best of my knowledge, ever submitted anything of any actual philosophical substance here in any case, so consider yourselves both disinvited.

This is especially true of JAK, who's still suckling from the CNN ninny even in adulthood, when he should have grown up intellectually and moved out of the baby pool. And you expect to be given intellectual respect, taking CNN, Larry King, and Bill Maher seriously?

Oh the pain...

Wow...LOL

I posted that previous post before I read the rest of the thread....and then I read this.

You are so predictable, it's kind of sad...

Coming from a snail that's quite a compliment.

Coggins7 wrote:Neither of you have ever, to the best of my knowledge, ever submitted anything of any actual philosophical substance here in any case, so consider yourselves both disinvited.

This is especially true of JAK, who's still suckling from the CNN ninny even in adulthood, when he should have grown up intellectually and moved out of the baby pool. And you expect to be given intellectual respect, taking CNN, Larry King, and Bill Maher seriously?

Oh the pain...

I see that JAK has joined your thread in the CF. Try to stay on the horse, Loran. Just a suggestion...

Coggins7 wrote:Coming from a snail that's quite a compliment.

I thought I was an Eskimo Pie head???