GoodK is Chap?

_GoodK · Post by **_GoodK** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:17 pm

I got an email from DCP, who apparently thinks I am posting as Chap now, for some odd reason.

Thought I'd post here, so Dan can see the vast differences between me and Chap's posts..

It seems that your son is posting as “Chap” now, rather than as “GoodK.”

What I admit that I don’t understand about his posts and those of his cheering section there is their overpowering urge to believe not merely that I’m wrong but that I’m either a stunningly incompetent idiot or pathological, or some combination of the two. With all the profundity of casual consumers of pop psychology who’ve never met their patient, they’re discussing possible explanations for my crippled psyche. It’s really pretty funny.

Post by **_Blixa** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:24 pm

Your posts are nothing alike. Not even remotely.

How odd.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:26 pm

Before I comment, I want to know how you received an email that addresses your parent if you're able to say and then I'll comment on the absurdity of the remarks in the email.

Post by **_the road to hana** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:29 pm

Jersey Girl wrote:Before I comment, I want to know how you received an email that addresses your parent if you're able to say and then I'll comment on the absurdity of the remarks in the email.

And clearly he's figured out whose child you are, so there goes anonymity.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:32 pm

the road to hana wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Before I comment, I want to know how you received an email that addresses your parent if you're able to say and then I'll comment on the absurdity of the remarks in the email.

And clearly he's figured out whose child you are, so there goes anonymity.

I hope GoodK will see my question regarding how he has a copy of email addressed to his parent and I'll be glad to straighten it out for him publicly. No problemo!

Post by **_beastie** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:35 pm

So far we have two apologists, rcrocket and DCP, who have rushed to "tattle" to GoodK's father.

And people wonder why we post anonymously?

Of course, LDS have, in times past, been flat-out encouraged to tattle on one another, so I guess it's no surprise.

Post by **_Moniker** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:41 pm

GoodK owes me a drink. Chap does not. That's enough of a distinction, for me. :)

_GoodK · Post by **_GoodK** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:42 pm

Jersey Girl wrote:
the road to hana wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Before I comment, I want to know how you received an email that addresses your parent if you're able to say and then I'll comment on the absurdity of the remarks in the email.

And clearly he's figured out whose child you are, so there goes anonymity.

I hope GoodK will see my question regarding how he has a copy of email addressed to his parent and I'll be glad to straighten it out for him publicly. No problemo!

I was CC'd Jersey Girl.

I hope that answer illuminates your day.

No Problemo!

_GoodK · Post by **_GoodK** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:42 pm

the road to hana wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Before I comment, I want to know how you received an email that addresses your parent if you're able to say and then I'll comment on the absurdity of the remarks in the email.

And clearly he's figured out whose child you are, so there goes anonymity.

I know.. Cat's out of the bag... :(

_GoodK · Post by **_GoodK** » Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:46 pm

Moniker wrote:GoodK owes me a drink. Chap does not. That's enough of a distinction, for me. :)

HA!

You got it.