Page 1 of 25

Church Surveillance

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:49 pm
by _Mister Scratch
I was re-reading the Lavina Fielding Anderson account of Mike Quinn's life, and I found myself feeling quite disturbed by the following:

Since the spring of 1988, Michael has been an independent scholar. Job searches at other universities have been thwarted by a tight academic market and ironically by a résumé so strong in Mormon publications. The very contributions for which his church damned him are also those that tend to chill interest in him as a teacher and scholar. He moved out of state, first to California in June 1988, then to New Orleans in 1989 where he lived in the French Quarter.

Those years were spent in introspection and exploration, trying to process what it meant that his mission and his dream since mid-teens had apparently ended. He was also trying to come to terms with his gay identity, including intensive work with a therapist. They were years spent in hiding, trying to heal from an emotional battering. He was careful to use a drop-box address, never attended church, and had an unlisted phone number. He knew that Church Security was trying to track him down. His mother, still an active Mormon, received a telephone call saying that he had left town without paying a bill. She passed the phone number on to Michael. When he checked, the number was for the LDS Membership Department. Two agents from Church Security appeared on his attorney's doorstep, demanded Michael's address, and told his lawyer that he was obligated by his temple covenants to give them the information. The attorney pleasantly wished them a good evening and closed the door in their faces. The Midwest office of a credit card company offered Michael an interest-free gold card by sending it to Jan's address (Jan was then living in Montana). When he accepted, a woman phoned and insisted on having his street address, rather than his post office box. When he asked how she knew that his address was a post office box (it was a regular house number), she stammered that either address would be acceptable. He got a follow-up letter asking for his residence address rather than his mail-drop address. This time the letter came from the Salt Lake City office of the credit card company. Michael may have initially taken these precautions with an ironic bow toward his own "paranoia," but repetition convinced him that once the church knew where to find him, the next communication would be a letter informing him of his church court.


I find this all highly disquieting---especially the bit about Church Security appearing at the door. I know that Steve Benson believed for a time that his phone had been tapped by the Church. Further, I've heard numerous accounts from various people about the Church mysteriously "tracking them down"--i.e., they'd moved, and then, out of nowhere, some bit of mail from the LDS Church turns up in their mailboxes, or the missionaries drop by, etc. I wonder: how does this mechanism work, exactly? Is it a matter of Church "agents" doing surveillance work on members? Or do family members "rat out" these wayward folks to the Church? Or (and I can't recall having ever heard of this happening), has anyone here ever gotten a call from the Church requesting the contact information for somebody?

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:59 pm
by _asbestosman
As a missionary, I seem to recall that if an inactive had moved that we would ask the neighbors about the new address.

I could be wrong, but will the post office supply this information? Can you mark mail as "retern address requested" or something like that? How about using a telephone book, or doing a reverse phone-number lookup (many people retain their phone numbers when moving)? I'm sure there are all kinds of tricks.

By the way, I already know that if I ever left the church (which I won't) that my relatives and friends would rat me out in heartbeat.

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:19 pm
by _LifeOnaPlate
Image


But not me.

Image

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:20 pm
by _Bond...James Bond
I'm a bit suprised that the LDS secret service type guys couldn't even find his address. I mean seriously...that's pretty bush league in my opinion.

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:22 pm
by _skippy the dead
asbestosman wrote:As a missionary, I seem to recall that if an inactive had moved that we would ask the neighbors about the new address.

I could be wrong, but will the post office supply this information? Can you mark mail as "retern address requested" or something like that? How about using a telephone book, or doing a reverse phone-number lookup (many people retain their phone numbers when moving)? I'm sure there are all kinds of tricks.

By the way, I already know that if I ever left the church (which I won't) that my relatives and friends would rat me out in heartbeat.


Although I'm not all that excited about the church's dedication to keeping track of its "members", I understand that they do it. Given that, using conventional methods to obtain an address (i.e., return address requests and phone books) are all fine and dandy. I may be annoyed that SLC calls my mom every now and then to get my address (and that she gives it to them), but that's still a voluntary act on my mom's part - they explicitly identify themselves as the membership records department.

But if those actions alleged by Anderson are true (even just one of them), that goes beyond reasonable, and into creepy and intimidating.

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:27 pm
by _Mister Scratch
Bond...James Bond wrote:I'm a bit suprised that the LDS secret service type guys couldn't even find his address. I mean seriously...that's pretty bush league in my opinion.


Well, as he stated, he took pains to conceal his location. Moreover, I kind of suspect that the LDS "agents" had to take some care in what they did, as it seems illegal on some level. I think we have to remember that this was back in the early 1990s---essentially pre-Internet, pre-cell phone days. Quinn had an unlisted phone number, and he received mail at a location other than his residence.

Based on his account, it sounds to me like they sent the "agents" to an SLC address---the attorney's---and that these guys weren't running around in New Orleans in an effort to track down Quinn. Further, the description of the "credit card woman" makes it seem as if folks at the COB were using subterfuge in order to try and get to him.

I would imagine that whatever sloppiness or ineptitude was exhibited on the part of Church Security/agents is a function of legality issues, technology at the time, and money. I rather doubt that the Church would be willing to pay for agents to be flown out to New Orleans in order to hunt down Quinn. If they had, I bet they would have found him, as many of these agents are former FBI and CIA.

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:30 pm
by _Mister Scratch
skippy the dead wrote:Although I'm not all that excited about the church's dedication to keeping track of its "members", I understand that they do it. Given that, using conventional methods to obtain an address (I.e., return address requests and phone books) are all fine and dandy. I may be annoyed that SLC calls my mom every now and then to get my address (and that she gives it to them), but that's still a voluntary act on my mom's part - they explicitly identify themselves as the membership records department.

But if those actions alleged by Anderson are true (even just one of them), that goes beyond reasonable, and into creepy and intimidating.


I agree. This account, coupled with what we know about the SCMC, plus what S. Benson and others have reported, definitely points to some extremely disquieting facets of the Church. (Oh, and let's not forget about the alleged fact that the Church "monitors over 1,500 websites.")

Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:37 pm
by _asbestosman
Maybe someone could do the in real life version of Honeypots if it really is a problem. When people are doing nefarious things but know that they may be caught, they either have to be extra careful, decide that the risk of being exposed is too great, or decide that the risk is acceptable.

Personally I wish credit companies would issue more fake numbers to catch criminals who steal from others. I wish that big websites would create fake profiles for the same reason.

Re: Church Surveillance

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:12 am
by _Ray A
Mister Scratch wrote:
I find this all highly disquieting---especially the bit about Church Security appearing at the door. I know that Steve Benson believed for a time that his phone had been tapped by the Church. Further, I've heard numerous accounts from various people about the Church mysteriously "tracking them down"--I.e., they'd moved, and then, out of nowhere, some bit of mail from the LDS Church turns up in their mailboxes, or the missionaries drop by, etc. I wonder: how does this mechanism work, exactly? Is it a matter of Church "agents" doing surveillance work on members? Or do family members "rat out" these wayward folks to the Church? Or (and I can't recall having ever heard of this happening), has anyone here ever gotten a call from the Church requesting the contact information for somebody?


I got a call from the SCMC, and they asked me if I knew a "Mister Scratch". I confessed that I did. I said that he was an anonymous coward who posted on Moron Discussions defaming people. They said they knew about him but that he was just a Moronic ego in search of praise from low anti-Mormon intellects who wouldn't know the difference between a dog and an elephant. Case dismissed. And I thought I could become famous!

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:19 am
by _bcspace
We here at the SCMC have bigger fish to fry.