DiscussMormonism.com

Posted: **Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:39 pm**

Tal said he wanted some propositions to falsify. He received them. Now, instead of entering into "serious, rational" debate, he attacks the OP as "silly".

We won't get fooled again...

Posted: **Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:59 pm**

The royal we?

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:02 am**

Moniker wrote:The royal we?

No, it includes me. ;-)

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:47 am**

Something unfalsifiable, can't be falsified. duh.

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:39 am**

Coggins7 wrote:Tal said he wanted some propositions to falsify. He received them. Now, instead of entering into "serious, rational" debate, he attacks the OP as "silly".

We won't get fooled again...

It was silly. Sorry but it really was. If you make this positions for Mormonism being falsified you can do the same thing with any claim as Tal did by using Leperuchans.

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:51 am**

Coggins7 wrote:Tal said he wanted some propositions to falsify. He received them. Now, instead of entering into "serious, rational" debate, he attacks the OP as "silly".

We won't get fooled again...

Oh, so NOW you understand that whole "you can't prove a falsehood" assumption. Glad class is back in session for Loran. Now loran , take heed oh One Who Wanders in Darkness, this is what we call 'learning from ones mistakes". Feels good, huh?

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:18 pm**

wenglund wrote:
Moniker wrote:The royal we?

No, it includes me. ;-)

Thanks, -Wade Englund-

Does that concern you?

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:30 pm**

Jason Bourne wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:Tal said he wanted some propositions to falsify. He received them. Now, instead of entering into "serious, rational" debate, he attacks the OP as "silly".

We won't get fooled again...

It was silly. Sorry but it really was. If you make this positions for Mormonism being falsified you can do the same thing with any claim as Tal did by using Leperuchans.

That was me with the Leprechauns!

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:12 pm**

Tarski wrote:That was me with the Leprechauns!

Nehor is gonna be jealous!!

Posted: **Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:47 pm**

Tarski wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:
Coggins7 wrote:Tal said he wanted some propositions to falsify. He received them. Now, instead of entering into "serious, rational" debate, he attacks the OP as "silly".

We won't get fooled again...

It was silly. Sorry but it really was. If you make this positions for Mormonism being falsified you can do the same thing with any claim as Tal did by using Leperuchans.

That was me with the Leprechauns!

Sorry.

That was Tarski! Got to give credit where credit is due!

DiscussMormonism.com

I Knew It Wouldn't Last

I Knew It Wouldn't Last

Re: I Knew It Wouldn't Last

Re: I Knew It Wouldn't Last

Re: I Knew It Wouldn't Last

Re: I Knew It Wouldn't Last

Re: I Knew It Wouldn't Last