What is immoral about having sex outside marriage? It's just 'cause God says so? That's it? Right?
Interesting question. The Gospel does not teach that anything is moral or immoral because God says so. God identifies to us standards, conditions, and actualities in the universe that we are then free to conform ourselves to or ignore. Sexual morality is one of a class of principles that may not be obvious to human beings but which is required of us if we are to be happy in this life (to a higher, more fulfilling degree) and have eternal life beyond this one. It is not immoral because God says so, but because it is; God identifying that state of affairs so that we can choose to live a higher or lower law in this life.
One would think, however, that God, being God, would be trustworthy in these matters.
Do you know what mirror neurons are, Coggins? You do recognize that those that do not empathize (or relate -- get into the mindset of others) may not recognize when they hurt others? Do you understand that? I think the ability to recognize our actions and how they impact us and others is what morality in its simplest form is.
Great. Now Moniker's letting Bundy, Dahmer, and Gacy of the hook. This is where liberalism leads....
White House
at is the purpose of morals, Coggins? Is it just to go through the motions 'cause God said so? Or is there a reason we should be moral (whatever that entails)?
Morality is the structural integrity of relationship. It is, in a Gospel sense (this is my own definition) that aspect of our relationships with one another that direct and channel them towards our happiness and eternal progression. It is that which creates, draws out, cultivates, and amplifies
character in ourselves and others.
Noooo.... morality is essential to human relations Coggins. What use is morals without the social aspect of it? Morality/ethics come into play when we deal with others, Coggins. In light of that it is easy to see how morality evolved as social orders did.
Yes, especially without empirical or historical evidence in an ex post facto manner...
Do you think all cultures have the same code of moral conduct as they always did? Did they change in some manner as humanity progressed? Why would that be? It's for survival purposes that we must learn to cooperate and interact with each other.
Interesting Moniker, as humans have survived for thousands of years under a almost continual regime of bloodshed, slaughter, war, genocide, and mayhem.
Animals have also survived for millions of years killing, eating, and predating one another.
Sociobiologially, morality is necessary for in-group, tribal, and kinship ties, and even national ties, but for little else. Historically, morality has been only for those within the tribe. For those outside the tribe. we'll see.
Morality, like righteousness itself, is a given; a cosmic axiom. God identifies this to us (regardless of our particular preferences regarding it). We accept his identifications (commandments, counsel, teachings of prophets etc.) or we do not.