Page 1 of 22

Mormon Church, wrong again re masturbation

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:09 pm
by _beastie
Men who frequently masturbate appear to have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, Australian researchers have reported.

Researchers from the Cancer Council of Victoria found that men who masturbated more than five times each week were a third less likely to develop the cancer.

The study surveyed 1,000 men who developed prostate cancer and 1,250 men who did not, between the ages of 20 and 50, it is reported by PlanetOut.

Researchers told the BBC last week that the prostate produces one of the fluids involved in ejaculation and that frequent masturbation appears to flush out carcinogens.

Sexual intercourse may not have the same effect because it increases the risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease, which could raise the risk of cancer, it is reported.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352276,00.html

Re: Mormon Church, wrong again re masturbation

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:03 pm
by _The Nehor
beastie wrote:
Men who frequently masturbate appear to have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, Australian researchers have reported.

Researchers from the Cancer Council of Victoria found that men who masturbated more than five times each week were a third less likely to develop the cancer.

The study surveyed 1,000 men who developed prostate cancer and 1,250 men who did not, between the ages of 20 and 50, it is reported by PlanetOut.

Researchers told the BBC last week that the prostate produces one of the fluids involved in ejaculation and that frequent masturbation appears to flush out carcinogens.

Sexual intercourse may not have the same effect because it increases the risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease, which could raise the risk of cancer, it is reported.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352276,00.html


Solution: Have lots and lots of sex with an undiseased partner. Got it.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:23 pm
by _beastie
Solution: Have lots and lots of sex with an undiseased partner. Got it.


I can tell YOU'VE never been married.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:34 pm
by _William Schryver
beastie wrote:
Solution: Have lots and lots of sex with an undiseased partner. Got it.


I can tell YOU'VE never been married.

???

I can tell YOU'VE never been happily married.

Oh, that's right. Mormon married couples NEVER have sex, except to procreate. And when they do, it's extremely boring and unfulfilling -- especially for the women.

Why would anyone want to be part of such an oppressive religion?

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:49 pm
by _beastie
Oh, for heaven's sake, have either of you even noticed the studies that affirm that married couples are not having sex more than five times a week? Are you both that clueless?

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro ... 7800&TICK=
NEWS&STORY=/www/story/06-22-2003/0001969545&EDATE=Jun+22,+2003

(you'll have to copy and paste the url, I lost my instructions on how to shorten it)



The statistical evidence would seem to show everything is fine. Married
couples say they have sex 68.5 times a year, or slightly more than once a
week, according to a 2002 study by the National Opinion Research Center at the
University of Chicago, and the numbers haven't changed much over the past
10 years. And at least according to what people tell researchers, couples who
could be classified as Duel Income, No Sex (DINS) are most likely an urban
myth: working women appear to have sex just as often as their stay-at-home
counterparts. And married people have 6.9 more sexual encounters a year than
people who have never been married.

But any efforts to quantify our love lives must be taken with a shaker of
salt. The problem, not surprisingly, is that people aren't very candid about
how often they have sex. When pressed, nearly everyone defaults to a
respectable "once or twice a week," a benchmark that probably seeped into our
collective consciousness with the 1953 Kinsey Report, a study that's
considered flawed because of its unrepresentative, volunteer sample. A
researcher's best guess: three times a week during the first year of marriage,
much less over time. When people feel they have permission to complain, they
often admit to having sex less than once a month
.


I'm sure there's some percentage of men who have sex over five times a week. But it's a very small percentage, and I wouldn't bet my prostrate health on it, if I were a man.

And, by the way, I've never claimed that LDS only have sex to procreate. I have claimed that a significant number of LDS males are likely sexually frustrated. There's probably quite a few LDS females in that pool as well.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:01 pm
by _Boaz & Lidia
William Schryver wrote:
beastie wrote:
Solution: Have lots and lots of sex with an undiseased partner. Got it.


I can tell YOU'VE never been married.

???

I can tell YOU'VE never been happily married.

Oh, that's right. Mormon married couples NEVER have sex, except to procreate. And when they do, it's extremely boring and unfulfilling -- especially for the women.

Why would anyone want to be part of such an oppressive religion?


Hey Willy, please tells us why PORN addiction is such a widespread problem for LDS males, married and single?

Re: Mormon Church, wrong again re masturbation

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:03 pm
by _Boaz & Lidia
The Nehor wrote:
beastie wrote:
Men who frequently masturbate appear to have a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, Australian researchers have reported.

Researchers from the Cancer Council of Victoria found that men who masturbated more than five times each week were a third less likely to develop the cancer.

The study surveyed 1,000 men who developed prostate cancer and 1,250 men who did not, between the ages of 20 and 50, it is reported by PlanetOut.

Researchers told the BBC last week that the prostate produces one of the fluids involved in ejaculation and that frequent masturbation appears to flush out carcinogens.

Sexual intercourse may not have the same effect because it increases the risk of contracting a sexually transmitted disease, which could raise the risk of cancer, it is reported.



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352276,00.html


Solution: Have lots and lots of sex with an undiseased partner. Got it.
Sister Rosie Palm on the left or right for Neh?

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:05 pm
by _William Schryver
beastie wrote:Oh, for heaven's sake, have either of you even noticed the studies that affirm that married couples are not having sex more than five times a week? Are you both that clueless?

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/micro ... 7800&TICK=
NEWS&STORY=/www/story/06-22-2003/0001969545&EDATE=Jun+22,+2003

(you'll have to copy and paste the url, I lost my instructions on how to shorten it)



The statistical evidence would seem to show everything is fine. Married
couples say they have sex 68.5 times a year, or slightly more than once a
week, according to a 2002 study by the National Opinion Research Center at the
University of Chicago, and the numbers haven't changed much over the past
10 years. And at least according to what people tell researchers, couples who
could be classified as Duel Income, No Sex (DINS) are most likely an urban
myth: working women appear to have sex just as often as their stay-at-home
counterparts. And married people have 6.9 more sexual encounters a year than
people who have never been married.

But any efforts to quantify our love lives must be taken with a shaker of
salt. The problem, not surprisingly, is that people aren't very candid about
how often they have sex. When pressed, nearly everyone defaults to a
respectable "once or twice a week," a benchmark that probably seeped into our
collective consciousness with the 1953 Kinsey Report, a study that's
considered flawed because of its unrepresentative, volunteer sample. A
researcher's best guess: three times a week during the first year of marriage,
much less over time. When people feel they have permission to complain, they
often admit to having sex less than once a month
.


I'm sure there's some percentage of men who have sex over five times a week. But it's a very small percentage, and I wouldn't bet my prostrate health on it, if I were a man.

And, by the way, I've never claimed that LDS only have sex to procreate. I have claimed that a significant number of LDS males are likely sexually frustrated. There's probably quite a few LDS females in that pool as well.

Fair enough.

Five times would be ... well, s-t-r-e-t-c-h-i-n-g it -- so to speak.

Although I have learned through personal experience that the things they say about 40-something women are absolutely true. My bedmate would probably welcome 5x/week, but I have better things to do -- like banter on message boards with anonymous women. ;-)
.
.
.
Anyway, it was fun to play for a few minutes this morning, beastlie dear. But I have to go groom horses, give them their spring wormer, trim tails and manes, and then fire up the tractor and transfer horse manure from the corral to the back pasture. So, although I'd love to stay here and shovel cybers*** with you, I need to attend to the real thing.

(Moderator Note) William, this is the second time in a week I have had to edit the "s" word out of your comments in the Terrestrial Forum. It's almost like you WANT me to take you behind the woodshed. ;) Seriously, please respect the rules of the forums. Thanks! Liz

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:06 pm
by _Imapiratewasher
But God wants people to have cancer... Didn't you know that? We should seek via faith in God to be healed, not prevent God's will.

Lol Just Kidding.

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:57 pm
by _Some Schmo
Yep, I masturbate to stay healthy.

I pity the fools who think there's something inherently wrong with it. Nobody has ever provided a single good reason to abstain; certainly not one that wasn't based on a myth (which wouldn’t constitute a good reason anyway). What a waste of a perfectly good penis.

I've heard guys say something they likely think is manly, like, "I don't need to masturbate, if you know what I mean." Well, I don't strictly need to either. I like it. And no, I don't know what you mean... what, you're missing a testicle or two?