Page 1 of 13

Serious question: How to prevent temple ordinances on dead?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:02 am
by _Boaz & Lidia
Is it possible to prevent the zealous temple monkeys from using a specific name in their stupid temple ceremonies for the dead?

Is it possible to request a name removal of a deceased person who was only baptized?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:33 am
by _The Nehor
Yes, destroy all references to the person's life. Kill anyone who may know their name or has ever heard of them. Break into and destroy all government, financial, and personal records that mention them. Then, since you probably knew them, kill yourself.

Short of direct revelation this will keep them out of the Temple until the Millenium. Let us know how it goes.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:36 am
by _Jersey Girl
The Nehor wrote:Yes, destroy all references to the person's life. Kill anyone who may know their name or has ever heard of them. Break into and destroy all government, financial, and personal records that mention them. Then, since you probably knew them, kill yourself.

Short of direct revelation this will keep them out of the Temple until the Millenium. Let us know how it goes.


You are disgusting, Nehor.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:42 am
by _Daniel Peterson
I would guess that barring baptisms for the dead would have to be part of a broader strategy that would forbid masses for the dead, prayers for the dead, invoking the memory of the dead, and, perhaps, thinking of the dead altogether.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:45 am
by _The Nehor
Jersey Girl wrote:
The Nehor wrote:Yes, destroy all references to the person's life. Kill anyone who may know their name or has ever heard of them. Break into and destroy all government, financial, and personal records that mention them. Then, since you probably knew them, kill yourself.

Short of direct revelation this will keep them out of the Temple until the Millenium. Let us know how it goes.


You are disgusting, Nehor.


I'm sorry I show no sympathy for a hateful zealot's crusade to keep someone's name from being mentioned in what he perceives as a mindless sham ceremony. Think of it this way PP. As long as people are doing pointless ordinances in the Temple they're not out converting the world. Should be a win for you.

Jersey Girl, PP knows there is no way to do what he is asking. If there were it would have been trumpeted to the entire anti world and dedicated people would be hard at work making sure no ordinances could be done. It was not a serious question.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:53 am
by _Jersey Girl
The Nehor wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
The Nehor wrote:Yes, destroy all references to the person's life. Kill anyone who may know their name or has ever heard of them. Break into and destroy all government, financial, and personal records that mention them. Then, since you probably knew them, kill yourself.

Short of direct revelation this will keep them out of the Temple until the Millenium. Let us know how it goes.


You are disgusting, Nehor.


I'm sorry I show no sympathy for a hateful zealot's crusade to keep someone's name from being mentioned in what he perceives as a mindless sham ceremony. Think of it this way PP. As long as people are doing pointless ordinances in the Temple they're not out converting the world. Should be a win for you.


First off, where in the hell do you see a "crusade"? I see two questions in the OP, marked "serious". Your response to two serious questions is to post sick jokes.

Just who is the hateful zealot? PP or you and your damn sick jokes?

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:55 am
by _Boaz & Lidia
Thanks.

This is concerning my sister. She recently died after a life of depression brought on by years of sexual abuse.

The Mormon church allowed her to be abused by our father and now she will be abused again in the name of keeping tithes rolling in.

LDS Inc has no shame.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:00 am
by _The Nehor
Jersey Girl wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
The Nehor wrote:Yes, destroy all references to the person's life. Kill anyone who may know their name or has ever heard of them. Break into and destroy all government, financial, and personal records that mention them. Then, since you probably knew them, kill yourself.

Short of direct revelation this will keep them out of the Temple until the Millenium. Let us know how it goes.


You are disgusting, Nehor.


I'm sorry I show no sympathy for a hateful zealot's crusade to keep someone's name from being mentioned in what he perceives as a mindless sham ceremony. Think of it this way PP. As long as people are doing pointless ordinances in the Temple they're not out converting the world. Should be a win for you.


First off, where in the hell do you see a "crusade"? I see two questions in the OP, marked "serious". Your response to two serious questions is to post sick jokes.

Just who is the hateful zealot? PP or you and your damn sick jokes?


I gave him the only "serious" answer he's going to get other then the answer that there is no way. Admittedly it was kind of silly since he's unlikely to be willing and/or able to fulfill all the requirements. Still, sometimes reality is damn sick and can be a joke.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:00 am
by _Boaz & Lidia
Daniel Peterson wrote:I would guess that barring baptisms for the dead would have to be part of a broader strategy that would forbid masses for the dead, prayers for the dead, invoking the memory of the dead, and, perhaps, thinking of the dead altogether.
Up late there Bishop?

Shouldn't you be prepping a condescending sermon for your vile non BYU single adult ward?

Re: Serious question: How to prevent temple ordinances on de

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:04 am
by _RockHeaded
Boaz & Lidia wrote:Is it possible to prevent the zealous temple monkeys from using a specific name in their stupid temple ceremonies for the dead?

Is it possible to request a name removal of a deceased person who was only baptized?


What does it matter? It doesn't hurt you or anyone else, but it does make the Utah LDS people feel better about themselves for doing it and there really isn't anything wrong with that, is there?