Does anyone understand how things work with the banning?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm
Does anyone understand how things work with the banning?
Over on MADB I almost got a good debate going in a thread on atheism and cosmology (I know a bit about both; especially the latter).
Thread title was "Thoughts On Articles On Atheism From Fair Topical Guide"
Dan Peterson didn't want to get into it even though it was about an article he wrote with Hamblin. I tried to be as inviting as possible and made a few attempts to get it going. I reviewed his article step by step.
He didn't want to discuss it but politely indicated some things were worth discussing (at another time?).
Well, OK then. I gave up with a rather cordial agreement to let Dan take it up later in whatever way he wanted.
I ended with
"OK, I hope you get around to expressing your ideas about some of the things I have put on the table.
Cheers"
That seemed rather friendly but it seems I am banned from responding to that specific thread/
This is a new one for me. What does it mean?
Dan assures me he doesn't want to be protected by the Mods. Are they doing it anyway?
Ironically, I was going to make one more post that merely supported something Dan was saying to Paul Ray.
Thread title was "Thoughts On Articles On Atheism From Fair Topical Guide"
Dan Peterson didn't want to get into it even though it was about an article he wrote with Hamblin. I tried to be as inviting as possible and made a few attempts to get it going. I reviewed his article step by step.
He didn't want to discuss it but politely indicated some things were worth discussing (at another time?).
Well, OK then. I gave up with a rather cordial agreement to let Dan take it up later in whatever way he wanted.
I ended with
"OK, I hope you get around to expressing your ideas about some of the things I have put on the table.
Cheers"
That seemed rather friendly but it seems I am banned from responding to that specific thread/
This is a new one for me. What does it mean?
Dan assures me he doesn't want to be protected by the Mods. Are they doing it anyway?
Ironically, I was going to make one more post that merely supported something Dan was saying to Paul Ray.
Last edited by W3C [Validator] on Sat May 24, 2008 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 832
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:18 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2750
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm
dartagnan wrote:I'm your huckleberry.
What was it you were trying to debate about anyway?
The existence of God?
Not really. Just whether or not his and Hamblins article had made any sense or accomplished anything (made any good points) with regard to atheism and cosmology. Read my run down of the article.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14216
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am
DCP is still posting.
The least they could do is notify people on the thread you've been prohibited from posting.
But no, of course DCP doesn't require special protection.
The least they could do is notify people on the thread you've been prohibited from posting.
But no, of course DCP doesn't require special protection.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2750
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
Re: Does anyone understand how things work with the banning?
Tarski wrote:Over on MADB I almost got a good debate going in a thread on atheism and cosmology (I know a bit about both; especially the latter).
Thread title was "Thoughts On Articles On Atheism From Fair Topical Guide"
Dan Peterson didn't want to get into it even though it was about an article he wrote with Hamblin. I tried to be as inviting as possible and made a few attempts to get it going. I reviewed his article step by step.
He didn't want to discuss it but politely indicated some things were worth discussing (at another time?).
Well, OK then. I gave up with a rather cordial agreement to let Dan take it up later in whatever way he wanted.
I ended with
"OK, I hope you get around to expressing your ideas about some of the things I have put on the table.
Cheers"
That seemed rather friendly but it seems I am banned from responding to that specific thread/
This is a new one for me. What does it mean?
Dan assures me he doesn't want to be protected by the Mods. Are they doing it anyway?
Ironically, I was going to make one more post that merely supported something Dan was saying to Paul Ray.
What is this? Selective thread banning, now? Someone oughtta go tell 'em what for.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Chinese Proverb
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18534
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm
That seemed rather friendly but it seems I am banned from responding to that specific thread/
This is a new one for me. What does it mean?
For what it's worth, I don't see anything offensive posted by you on that thread. I don't see that you are banned either. Is there a message that comes up when you try to reply? Is the Add Reply button visible?
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm
bcspace wrote:That seemed rather friendly but it seems I am banned from responding to that specific thread/
This is a new one for me. What does it mean?
For what it's worth, I don't see anything offensive posted by you on that thread. I don't see that you are banned either. Is there a message that comes up when you try to reply? Is the Add Reply button visible?
Yes, a message comes up if I try to post that says "Sorry, you have been banned from viewing and/or replying to this topic" (or something like that).
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo