DiscussMormonism.com

Search for POLYGAMY on josephsmith.net

Result?

"Your search for polygamy has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net."

Who owns josephsmith.net?

Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
50 East North Temple Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3011
US
1-801-240-3959 fax: 1-801-240-1187

According to the Mormon Cult, Joseph Smith had nothing to do at all with Polygamy.

So stop confusing them with those darned fundamentalists!

Infymus wrote:Search for POLYGAMY on josephsmith.net

Result?

"Your search for polygamy has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net."

Who owns josephsmith.net?

Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
50 East North Temple Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3011
US
1-801-240-3959 fax: 1-801-240-1187

According to the Mormon Cult, Joseph Smith had nothing to do at all with Polygamy.

So stop confusing them with those darned fundamentalists!

Search for "plural marriage" results in the same. No results. 0.

Search for "marriage" or "wife" results only in hits with Emma Smith.

Search for "Eliza Snow" brings up page on her with no mention of her being wife to either Joseph Smith or Brigham Young.

Will there ever be a time the LDS Church actually is forthcoming in historical representations of these marriages on a site such as this?

And members wonder why the LDS church can't be trusted.

:-(

~dancer~

Is this site owned by the church?

Scottie wrote:Is this site owned by the church?

Let's see who owns "LDS.ORG":

Domain Name:LDS.ORG
Registrant Name:Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
Registrant Organization:Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
Registrant Street1:50 East North Temple Street
Registrant City:Salt Lake City
Registrant State/Province:UT
Registrant Postal Code:84150-3011

Who owns Josephsmith.net?

Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
50 East North Temple Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3011
US

Seem to be one and the same to me.

From LDS main website: Home -> Paces to Visit -> Salt Lake City -> Church Office Building

Address:
50 E. North Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150

What is at 50 East North Temple?



Why the Cult Corporate HQ of Mormonism.

it that an alias(CNAME for DNS nerds) of warm-sappy-milk-b4-meat.com?


The look on members faces is priceless when they realize it has not been pure milk that they have been drinking but the copious amounts of puss oozing from the rotting maggot infested meat.

According to the Mormon Cult, Joseph Smith had nothing to do at all with Polygamy.

I seem to recall a similar claim from another thread not too long ago. I also seem to recall that it took less than 5 minutes to find references on josephsmith.net about his plural marriages. I checked and they are still there. So as before, I will leave the proof to the student as finding these references was so easy that one can only conclude that Infymus has a very low IQ or an agenda to bash the Church by lying about it.

Infymus wrote:Search for POLYGAMY on josephsmith.net

Result?

"Your search for polygamy has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net."

Who owns josephsmith.net?

Intellectual Reserve, Inc.
50 East North Temple Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84150-3011
US
1-801-240-3959 fax: 1-801-240-1187

According to the Mormon Cult, Joseph Smith had nothing to do at all with Polygamy.

So stop confusing them with those darned fundamentalists!

Now infymus, pay close attention. I agree with you. This is troublesome and bothers me. A lot. See. I do agree with you sometimes.

bcspace wrote:

According to the Mormon Cult, Joseph Smith had nothing to do at all with Polygamy.

I seem to recall a similar claim from another thread not too long ago. I also seem to recall that it took less than 5 minutes to find references on josephsmith.net about his plural marriages. I checked and they are still there. So as before, I will leave the proof to the student as finding these references was so easy that one can only conclude that Infymus has a very low IQ or an agenda to bash the Church by lying about it.

If I recall you could not find it on the site and had to link elsewhere.

I did say "references" didn't I? Why would the Church provide such references if their attitude is as claimed?