Lunatic or moron?
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm
Lunatic or moron?
I post this in honor of Kevin Graham, who is known to call people idiots with some frequency, but every once in a while, If I recall correctly, moron.
This quote comes from Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum, and concerns the difference between a lunatic and a moron. When we consider our favorite apologist or critic to insult, we may as well do it as accurately as possible. What do you think of Eco's definitions? I for one have a difficult time deciding which category to put my favorite apologists into, since they sometimes fit one, and sometimes the other.
"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idée fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense, by his flashes of inspiration, and by the fact that sooner or later he brings up the Templars."
This quote comes from Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum, and concerns the difference between a lunatic and a moron. When we consider our favorite apologist or critic to insult, we may as well do it as accurately as possible. What do you think of Eco's definitions? I for one have a difficult time deciding which category to put my favorite apologists into, since they sometimes fit one, and sometimes the other.
"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idée fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense, by his flashes of inspiration, and by the fact that sooner or later he brings up the Templars."
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm
The Nehor wrote:Oh, this thread is not about me? Never mind then.
Yes, Nehor, sorry to disappoint you, but this one isn't about you. ;-)
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:56 am
Re: Lunatic or moron?
Trevor wrote:I post this in honor of Kevin Graham, who is known to call people idiots with some frequency, but every once in a while, If I recall correctly, moron.
This quote comes from Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum, and concerns the difference between a lunatic and a moron. When we consider our favorite apologist or critic to insult, we may as well do it as accurately as possible. What do you think of Eco's definitions? I for one have a difficult time deciding which category to put my favorite apologists into, since they sometimes fit one, and sometimes the other.
"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idée fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense, by his flashes of inspiration, and by the fact that sooner or later he brings up the Templars."
By this definition, there is a level of lunacy in all apologists. Some obvious names came to me for both categories, but I will restrain myself and not reveal them.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am
Re: Lunatic or moron?
"A lunatic is easily recognized. He is a moron who doesn't know the ropes. The moron proves his thesis; he has a logic, however twisted it may be. The lunatic, on the other hand, doesn't concern himself at all with logic; he works by short circuits. For him, everything proves everything else. The lunatic is all idée fixe, and whatever he comes across confirms his lunacy. You can tell him by the liberties he takes with common sense, by his flashes of inspiration, and by the fact that sooner or later he brings up the Templars."
Most Mormons are lunatics but the Maxwell Institute is charged with turning them into morons.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14216
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am
Most Mormons are lunatics but the Maxwell Institute is charged with turning them into morons.
There's more truth than poetry in there.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 7213
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm
Re: Lunatic or moron?
The Dude wrote:Most Mormons are lunatics but the Maxwell Institute is charged with turning them into morons.
And yet the parallelomania that some apologists indulge in seems more a trait of lunacy.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am
Re: Lunatic or moron?
Trevor wrote:The Dude wrote:Most Mormons are lunatics but the Maxwell Institute is charged with turning them into morons.
And yet the parallelomania that some apologists indulge in seems more a trait of lunacy.
Hmmm... Where do apologists draw a parallel between Templars and the Book of Mormon?
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 11832
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am
Re: Lunatic or moron?
The Dude wrote:Hmmm... Where do apologists draw a parallel between Templars and the Book of Mormon?
Because the Templars were a group of Nephites who crossed back over the ocean to hide certain documents that need to be found before the Second Coming. They carried on their traditions for years and found and passed on a copy of Nephite history to the Ten Tribes hiding in caves in Russia. They then buried the most precious documents in Mount Moriah while they masqueraded as an order of knights. I thought everyone knew this. The last surviving member leads the Danites today. Do you people read nothing?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm
Lunacy seems much more in evidence than moronism, at least by these definitions. However, whilst recently re-reading Tristram Shandy , the exposition on hobby horses brought several names from this board to mind...
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."