Page 1 of 8
Kamenraider's Posting Privileges Revoked At MADB!
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:25 am
by _kamenraider
The post that caused this to happen:
juliann wrote:
QUOTE(juliann @ Jul 10 2008, 08:59 PM)
We went through this in the last thread. You weren't looking at the most recent version. It no longer says a woman must choose one husband. Why do we have to keep going over the same things?
...
kamenraider replied:
How do we know that it's not either you or one of your UMW friends posting as a mod, that forbade quoting from the Church Handbook so you wouldn't have to prove this?
a mod soon replied:
We have never allowed quoting from the CHI and insulting mods is never a good idea. You are out. ~ Mods
I don't remember seeing anything at all about not quoting from the Church Handbook in the MADB Board Guidelines, in fact I've quoted from it a number of times at MADB without ever being told not to.
So anyway, I squeezed in one last post to the mod:
You consider it an insult to be identified as juliann?
Was I really
that insulting? Did I break some rule that I'm not aware of? Should juliann be allowed to use mods to bully people when she's losing arguments? What do you folks think?
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:38 am
by _CaliforniaKid
You're a walking bag of insults, you are. I'm sure you deserved everything you got. Juliann is just too good-natured to ban you without due cause.
(Congratulations on your rite-of-passage. You'll always be welcome over here in the cool club. :-P)
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:41 am
by _Trevor
I'm pretty sure the name juliann is an insult anywhere civil discourse and freedom of expression are in vogue.
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:49 am
by _truth dancer
We're just glad to have you! :-)
Welcome!
Here we all play with the same rules! ;-)
~dancer~
Also, if you have the CHI, you can quote the significant statement here which would help us know what the truth is. I for one am curious.
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:04 am
by _Ray A
truth dancer wrote:
Also, if you have the CHI, you can quote the significant statement here which would help us know what the truth is. I for one am curious.
The relevant portion from the CHI is here:
Deceased Women
A deceased woman may be sealed to all men to whom she was legally married during her life. However, if she was sealed to a husband during her life, all her husbands must be deceased before she can be sealed to a husband to whom she was not sealed during life.
Re: Kamenraider's Posting Privileges Revoked At MADB!
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:07 am
by _skippy the dead
kamenraider wrote:juliann wrote:
QUOTE(juliann @ Jul 10 2008, 08:59 PM)
We went through this in the last thread. You weren't looking at the most recent version. It no longer says a woman must choose one husband. Why do we have to keep going over the same things?
...
I actually thought that this was absurd - that the mods (or juliann) could make a rule that you can't quote the CHI, when that's exactly what's at issue. For juliann's purposes, it was better for her to make the bare assertion and be immune from rebuttal with pesky facts.
Are you banned from the board for good?
Re: Kamenraider's Posting Privileges Revoked At MADB!
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:26 am
by _Runtu
skippy the dead wrote:
Are you banned from the board for good?
It looks like he's just suspended.
Re: Kamenraider's Posting Privileges Revoked At MADB!
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:34 am
by _solomarineris
"kamenraider"]
Was I really that insulting? Did I break some rule that I'm not aware of? Should juliann be allowed to use mods to bully people when she's losing arguments? What do you folks think?
Consider yourself evicted from Celestial Kingdom.
Welcome to meager, terrestrial Kingdom of Dr Shades.
I knew you as pretty decent fellow there, you didn't stir up much controversy.
But I trust Juliann's instincts; She's learning well how to separate chaff from the wheat.
Her claws are getting sharper as the list of her victims grow exponentially.
She's becoming a self destructive bitch, I must say.
Pretty soon she won't have anybody but herself to play with.
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:42 am
by _cksalmon
KR:
Oh, boy. I predicted your downfall from MADB months ago. Well, it was a personal prediction. Definitely not documented.
But, I thought, on several occasions: "Man, that guy is treading on thin ice."
You might just be the worst sort of scum there: a questioning Latter-day Saint.
Are you banned?
Chris
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 2:43 am
by _Runtu
cksalmon wrote:KR:
Oh, boy. I predicted your downfall from MADB months ago. Well, it was a personal prediction. Definitely not documented.
But, I thought, on several occasions: "Man, that guy is treading on thin ice."
You might just be the worst sort of scum there: a questioning Latter-day Saint.
Are you banned?
Chris
I'm predicting MatthewG will be next.