How many books does it take to make a trend? (And does this mean the critics are winning?)
The critics have always been winning. With the crazy stories that Mormons base their faith on, we have the upper hand by default.
Check out the obligatory familial credentials on the above page:
He and his wife, Shauna Sizemore Millet, are the parents of six children.
Why do Mormon authors feel the need to include this? Do they think it will help sell more books by demonstrating their commitment to the LDS cult by the number of kids they pop out?
I also wonder if his wife was a BYU coed when they met.
The title's emphasis makes an interesting contrast with Mike Ash's book. Millet says "Holding Fast" -- that's the thing they want you to do. Ash says "Shaken Faith" -- highlighting the thing they don't want.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
Interesting. There must be a market for "defense against the dark arts" books. If the evil antis weren't having an effect, there would be no need for such a book.
Runtu wrote:Interesting. There must be a market for "defense against the dark arts" books. If the evil antis weren't having an effect, there would be no need for such a book.
Sure there is. Else why would FARMS sell so many of it's review books?
I think "Holding Fast" is better than the original title:
"Holding Back to the Tide with a Teaspoon: Dealing with Doubts in the Latter Days"
It must be really difficult to write one of these books. I mean, you can't be too specific or you'll end up cataloging all the reasons people should leave the Church, and someone who just doubted based on one single thing will suddenly find themselves with many more reasons.
"Chapter 1: What to do if you're doubting because of Polygamy
Chapter 2: What to do if you're doubting based on the Book of Abraham
Chapter 3: What to do if you're doubting based on Joseph Smith's treasure seeking and unusual translation method
How many books does it take to make a trend? (And does this mean the critics are winning?)
Millet needs to spend more time researching than he does writing. I haven't read this new book, but if it is anything like his recent "what happened to the cross?"... I think I'll pass.
cinepro wrote:It must be really difficult to write one of these books. I mean, you can't be too specific or you'll end up cataloging all the reasons people should leave the Church, and someone who just doubted based on one single thing will suddenly find themselves with many more reasons.
How so?
Perhaps the attempt of Millet and those of his apologetic authoring ilk is to merely retain members such as you have been retained?
You are a fine example of a member full of doubt, cynicism, and tithing. Just keep paying tithes and allowing your children to be brainwashed by the leaders which you trust.