Page 1 of 1

Simon, the "real" Messiah?

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:10 pm
by _Mad Viking
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/commen ... 295804.ece

For some the stone confirms Christianity’s roots in Jewish tradition while others feel that the tablet discredits the Resurrection as a mere reproduction of an ancient fable.


Several participants of the conference accused him of using the tablet to rehash a theory that he had presented in his 2002 book, The Messiah Before Jesus.


Hopefully, I am not bringing up old news.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:15 pm
by _Ray A
This is the Simon referred to in the debate:

http://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/me ... nts02.html

It doesn't appear that contemporary historians considered him the Messiah, or even a messiah.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:39 pm
by _Mad Viking
Ray A wrote:This is the Simon referred to in the debate:

http://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/me ... nts02.html

It doesn't appear that contemporary historians considered him the Messiah, or even a messiah.


The title of my post was tongue in cheek. The point, according to Professor Knohl, is that the notion of leaders rising from the dead among Jews did not originate with Christ. Furthermore, given this Simon's activities I would not go so far as to say that some did not consider him a messiah per the rabbinic definition.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:39 pm
by _The Nehor
He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:44 pm
by _Mad Viking
The Nehor wrote:He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy.


I disagree. He is the Messiah.

Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:51 pm
by _Ray A
Mad Viking wrote:The title of my post was tongue in cheek. The point, according to Professor Knohl, is that the notion of leaders rising from the dead among Jews did not originate with Christ. Furthermore, given this Simon's activities I would not go so far as to say that some did not consider him a messiah per the rabbinic definition.


I think it's quite likely old traditions and beliefs were incorporated into the Christian Story. Comparing Mark (the earliest gospel) with Matthew 1-3 there is clear evidence of embellishment and a desire for Jesus to "fit" the prophecies of the expected Messiah.

Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:01 am
by _moksha
Image

If he is the Messiah we better mend our ways, fast!

Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:31 am
by _Mad Viking
moksha wrote:Image

If he is the Messiah we better mend our ways, fast!


Don't get too worried. There is no such thing as a Messiah.

Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:33 am
by _JonasS
This all reminds me of something my mum once said. Hmmm... Oh well.