DiscussMormonism.com

Perhaps everyone already knows this; if so, my apologies for wasting your time.

Anyhow, our new weblog system isn't nearly as "comment friendly" as our last one was. You may have noticed that if you wish to respond to a blog entry, clicking the "0 Comments" link won't take you straight to a comment-input field like the last system.

To make a comment on a blog entry, simply click on the blog entry's title in the upper-left hand corner, right after the words "Post subject." That'll take you to the direct URL of the entry itself. Near the upper-left hand corner, again, will now appear a green button titled "Post Reply." Click on that button, and voila! You can now post your comment.

Again, maybe everyone already knows this, but there have been a dearth of blog replies lately, especially compared to our last system, so perhaps this can benefit some folks.

Happy commenting!

.

Always acknowledge TAK.

[This is completely off topic. And everything thus far spawned by this comment is off-topic--CKS]

Daniel Peterson wrote:Always acknowledge TAK.

Quit acting like a douchebag.

[This is a personal attack, I believe, per the modified board rules--CKS]

silentkid wrote:Quit acting like a douchebag.

Douchebags are inanimate objects. If you think they have personalities, you need serious help.

Do you think about them often? Does this upset you?

Do they come to you at night? Do they speak? Are their voices familiar to you? Do they ask you to do things that make you uncomfortable?

Daniel Peterson wrote:Do they come to you at night? Do they speak? Are their voices familiar to you? Do they ask you to do things that make you uncomfortable?

Yes to the first question. Yes to the second. Yes to the third. Yes to the fourth. I need serious help.

Daniel Peterson wrote:Always acknowledge TAK.

I don't understand the joke. A little help, please?

silentkid wrote:

Daniel Peterson wrote:Always acknowledge TAK.

Quit acting like a douchebag.

You mean a seething cauldron of douche.

Dr. Shades wrote:

Daniel Peterson wrote:Always acknowledge TAK.

I don't understand the joke. A little help, please?

Tak said something that Dr. Peterson didn't like in another thread and now he's trying to derail everything with this "acknowledge TAK" thing. It's really funny.

Dr. Shades wrote:

Daniel Peterson wrote:Always acknowledge TAK.

I don't understand the joke. A little help, please?

It appears to have started Here. Third post from the end.

Ray A wrote:It appears to have started Here. Third post from the end.

I guess DCP did not like my stating the obvious.